犯罪论体系中位阶性问题的反思——对阶层体系客观判断优先的质疑

发布时间：2018-07-03 09:39

本文选题：四要件 + 三阶层　；参考：《政治与法律》2015年03期

【摘要】：在犯罪论体系上,我国目前正在经历着三阶层与四要件体系的争论,位阶性问题在其中更是具有"举足轻重"的地位。四要件缺乏从违法到责任的位阶关系,它自身有着一次性、整体性判断的弊端,形成了分离性与整体性之间的矛盾。三阶层体系虽然可以区分违法与责任,但是就其中的构成要件阶层而言,其实与四要件体系一样,同样无法保证客观判断优先。在存在论上,由于行为是主客观的统一体,因此两者无法截然分割。在价值论上,认为三阶层体系有着客观判断优先于主观判断的位阶性,四要件导致主观主义的观点,混淆了体系与立场,是学者的不法观强加于体系之上所形成的错觉。只有对此进行深刻反思,保持理性的态度,才能厘清位阶性的真正含义,也才能期许犯罪论体系的合理转型。
[Abstract]:In the system of crime theory, our country is going through the argument between three strata and four elements system at present, the rank problem is more important among them. The four elements lack the rank relation from violation of law to responsibility, and it has its own drawbacks of one-off and integrality judgment, which forms the contradiction between separability and integrity. Although the three-class system can distinguish the violation of the law from the responsibility, but as for the hierarchy of the constitutive elements, it can not guarantee the objective judgment first, just like the four-element system. In ontology, because behavior is a subjective and objective unity, the two cannot be separated completely. In the theory of value, it is believed that the three-class system has the rank of objective judgment taking precedence over subjective judgment, and the four elements lead to subjectivism, which confuses the system and position, and is an illusion formed by the scholars' illegal view imposed on the system. Only by deeply reflecting and maintaining a rational attitude can the real meaning of rank be clarified and the reasonable transformation of the crime theory system be expected.
【作者单位】：东南大学法学院;
【分类号】：D914

【参考文献】