论基准刑及其裁量方法——以《最高人民法院关于常见犯罪的量刑指导意见》为参照

发布时间：2018-07-07 13:21

本文选题：基准刑 + 犯罪阶梯　；参考：《学术交流》2017年02期

【摘要】：我国《量刑指导意见》关于基准刑及其裁量方法的规定存在不足,有必要重新探讨基准刑的内涵并构建科学的裁量方法。基准刑是全部犯罪构成事实所决定的刑罚,图表法是确定基准刑的可行方法。图表法的基本思路是,以某罪的犯罪阶梯和刑罚阶梯为横轴和纵轴建立图表,在此图表中确定该罪的量刑线;法官在对具体案件进行量刑时,先以客观危害性为基础确定其在犯罪阶梯中的位置,再通过量刑线确定其在刑罚阶梯中的位置,然后将该点对应的系数转化为刑罚;最后,根据行为人的主观恶性和其他犯罪构成事实对该刑罚作适当调整,所得结果即为基准刑。
[Abstract]:There are some deficiencies in the provisions of our country's "sentencing guidance opinion" about the standard penalty and its discretion method. It is necessary to re-explore the connotation of the standard penalty and construct a scientific discretion method. Benchmark penalty is the penalty determined by the fact that all crimes constitute a crime, and chart method is a feasible method to determine the standard penalty. The basic idea of the chart method is to use the crime ladder and penalty ladder of a crime as the horizontal axis and the vertical axis, in which the penalty line of the crime is determined; when the judge carries out the sentencing of a specific case, Firstly, based on the objective harmfulness, the position in the crime ladder is determined, then the position in the penalty ladder is determined by the sentencing line, and then the corresponding coefficient of this point is transformed into the penalty; finally, According to the subjective malignancy of the perpetrator and the fact that other crimes constitute the appropriate adjustment of the penalty, the result is the benchmark penalty.
【作者单位】：江苏大学法学院;
【基金】：国家社科青年项目“转型时期量刑公正与社会认同的契合路径研究”(14CFX069) 司法部项目“网络时代贪污贿赂犯罪的量刑公信力问题实证研究”(14SFB30017) 江苏大学高级技术人才科研启动基金项目“我国量刑规范化改革视阈中的量刑方法研究”(14JDG115)
【分类号】：D924.13

【相似文献】