轮奸情节研究

发布时间：2018-07-14 13:58

【摘要】：我国《刑法》第236条第3款第4项规定，二人以上轮奸的，处10年以上有期徒刑、无期徒刑或者死刑。该规定明确地将“轮奸”列举为强奸罪的一种法定加重情节。但是，何为轮奸？在何种情形下才能认定为轮奸？轮奸有无犯罪停止形态？对这些刑法与司法解释并未明确规定问题的解答，成为正确理解和适用轮奸情节的前提，具有重大的理论与实践价值。基于此，本文将轮奸情节作为研究的中心，通过研究轮奸情节的各种相关问题，以期能够对“二人以上轮奸的”这一加重情节进行较为深入的分析，从而使其在我国的司法实践中被更为准确地运用。除引言和结语外，本文共分为轮奸的概述、轮奸的法律性质、轮奸的司法认定以及轮奸犯罪停止形态的司法适用四个部分，约45000字，主要内容如下：第一部分，轮奸的概述。该部分主要介绍了轮奸的相关理论问题，包括轮奸的概念、轮奸的成立条件、轮奸加重刑罚处罚的依据和轮奸与亲手犯之辨析。首先，通过对轮奸字面概念和学界概念的分析，将轮奸界定为二男以上（包括本数）出于轮奸的故意，，在同一时间段内对同一妇女（或幼女）轮流实行强奸（或奸淫）的行为。其次，根据轮奸的含义提出了轮奸成立的四个基本条件。再次，从行为人主观方面和行为造成的危害后果等方面分析了轮奸的刑罚加重依据。最后，辨析了轮奸与亲手犯之间的关系，排除了亲手犯理论对轮奸案件的适用可能。第二部分，轮奸的法律性质。在本部分，笔者从两个角度讨论轮奸的法律性质。一方面，结合对加重情节基本性质的分析，轮奸情节从性质上更应当被视为一种定罪情节；另一方面，综合考虑案例判决和理论探讨，轮奸的性质不限于强奸的共同犯罪形式，现实中存在不构成强奸罪共同犯罪却成立轮奸情节的情形。第三部分，轮奸的司法认定。轮奸的司法认定需要就轮奸的成立提出一种合理的标准。笔者通过分析轮奸在预备阶段能否成立、轮奸的成立是否要求行为人达到既遂和等待实施强奸的人是否成立轮奸这三个问题，认为轮奸的成立在客观上应表现为二人以上轮流实施强奸犯罪的实行行为。针对轮奸故意和“轮奸后又通奸”的司法认定问题，笔者认为前者应当结合具体情形具体分析，而后者仍应当以强奸罪定罪并适用轮奸情节。而在轮奸条款与其它条款交叉的情形下，应对轮奸被拐卖妇女、轮奸后迫使卖淫的行为适用轮奸情节进行处理，以实现罪刑相适应。第四部分，轮奸犯罪停止形态的司法适用。在该部分，笔者首先对司法判决进行对比分析，引出轮奸犯罪停止形态在司法实践中适用不一致的现实。随后，通过理论分析和佐证，得出加重犯具有相对独立性、轮奸作为情节加重犯存在犯罪停止形态的结论。在此基础上，分类详述轮奸犯罪停止形态的司法适用，包括轮奸犯罪既遂形态、轮奸犯罪未遂形态和轮奸犯罪中止形态的具体适用。最后，结合司法实践中的做法，笔者认为应该在坚持区分轮奸犯罪停止形态和“部分实行、全部责任”原则的基础上，具体裁量各行为人的刑罚。
[Abstract]:China's "Criminal Law > 236th articles and third paragraphs" fourth provisions, more than two people gang rape, sentenced to imprisonment for more than 10 years, life imprisonment or death penalty. This provision explicitly enumerates "gang rape" as a statutory aggravated plot of rape. But, where is gang rape? In what circumstances can it be recognized as gang rape, gang rape has a crime stop form? To these The interpretation of criminal law and judicial interpretation does not specify the solution of the problem clearly. It has become a prerequisite for the correct understanding and application of the plot of gang rape. It is of great theoretical and practical value. Based on this, this paper takes the plot of gang rape as the center of the study and studies the various related problems of the plot of gang rape, in order to be able to make the aggravation of "two or more Gang rapes". The section carries on the thorough analysis, thus causes it to be used more accurately in our country's judicial practice.
In addition to the introduction and conclusion, this article is divided into four parts: the summary of the gang rape, the legal nature of the gang rape, the judicial confirmation of the gang rape and the judicial application of the form of the cessation of gang rape, about 45000 words, the main contents are as follows:
The first part is an overview of the gang rape. This part mainly introduces the related theoretical problems of the gang rape, including the concept of gang rape, the condition of the gang rape, the basis of the gang rape to aggravate the punishment and the discrimination between the gang rape and the hand offense. First, through the analysis of the literal concept of the gang rape and the concept of the academic circle, the gang rape is defined as two men or more (including the number) out of the law. The act of rape (or adultery) is carried out in rotation of the same woman (or young woman) in the same period of time. Secondly, according to the meaning of gang rape, the four basic conditions for the establishment of gang rape are put forward. Again, the aggravation of the gang of gang rape is analyzed from the side of the subjective aspect and the harm caused by the behavior. Finally, it distinguishes the wheel. The relationship between crafty and hands-on offenders excludes the possibility of the application of the theory of personal offense to gang rape cases.
The second part, the legal nature of the gang rape. In this part, the author discusses the legal nature of the gang rape from two angles. On the one hand, in combination with the analysis of the basic nature of the aggravated plot, the plot of the gang rape should be considered as a conviction plot in nature; on the other hand, the nature of the gang rape is not limited to rape. In the form of joint crime, there is a situation where there is no crime of rape but a gang rape.
The third part, the judicial confirmation of the gang rape. The judicial confirmation of the gang rape needs to put forward a reasonable standard for the establishment of the gang rape. Through the analysis of whether the gang rape can be established in the preparatory stage, whether the establishment of the gang rape requires the perpetrator to achieve the accomplished and wait for the rape of the people to establish a round of rape, the author thinks that the establishment of the gang rape is objective. The author believes that the former should be analyzed in accordance with specific circumstances, and that the latter should be convicted of rape and apply the plot of gang rape, and in the case of the cross between the gang rape clause and the other clauses. Gang rape and abduction and trafficking of women should be handled by gang rape after rape.
The fourth part is the judicial application of the stop form of the gang rape. In this part, the author first contrasts the judicial judgment, leads to the reality of the disagreement in the practice of the cessation of the gang rape in the judicial practice. Then, through the theoretical analysis and evidence, it is concluded that the aggravated crime has the opposite independence, and the gang rape is a crime stop as a plot aggravating crime. On this basis, the paper expounds the judicial application of the stop form of the gang rape, including the completed form of the crime of gang rape, the attempted form of the crime of gang rape and the specific application of the suspended form of the crime of gang rape. Finally, in the light of the practice in judicial practice, the author thinks that the form of the stop of the gang rape and the "partial implementation" should be persisted. On the basis of the principle of full responsibility, we should make specific judgments on the penalties of various actors.
【学位授予单位】：西南政法大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2014
【分类号】：D924.34

【参考文献】