王某阳、贾某洋玩忽职守案的刑法分析

发布时间：2018-07-16 14:17

【摘要】：刑法条文关于玩忽职守罪的规定极为简单,并且将玩忽职守罪和滥用职权罪归纳在同一条文之中,这就造成理论界和司法实践中,对该罪的认定都存在较大分歧,尤其以玩忽职守行为的认定与重大损失认定以及二者之间是否存在因果关系争议较大。同时,玩忽职守案的司法认定问题一直很值得关注和探讨。理论界和实务界的争论就很容易引起法院作出不合理的判决。因而笔者选取一个有关玩忽职守的案例,通过对该案的剖析来探析玩忽职守罪的相关问题。笔者以王某阳、贾某洋玩忽职守一案为切入点,对玩忽职守罪进行分析。以该案为例,通过介绍案情及争议焦点,对“玩忽职守”行为、“重大损失”的含义进行剖析,且就本案的因果关系进行探讨,同时对犯罪构成进行分析以及玩忽职守罪的司法认定问题的分析,得出本案王某阳、贾某洋的行为不属于“玩忽职守”行为,被告人王某阳、贾某洋在对罪犯田某雄作出暂予监外执行的决定中认真履行了职责,不存在严重不负责任,不履行或不认真履行职责的行为。虽然本案中也存在重大损失的发生,但王、贾二人的行为与“重大损失”之间没有因果关系,本案案件事实不符合犯罪构成,因而不构成玩忽职守罪。案件的剖析虽然暂告一段落,但有关玩忽职守的案件有许多引人思考的地方,如刑法条文对玩忽职守罪的规定过于简单,并且玩忽职守罪与滥用职权罪并存于同一刑法条文,针对这些立法上的不足,笔者也给出了自己的一些建议,如可以充实罪状表述,将主观罪过形式表现在刑法条文中,适当提高玩忽职守罪的法定刑等。
[Abstract]:The provisions of the criminal law on the crime of dereliction of duty are very simple, and the crime of dereliction of duty and the crime of abuse of power are classified in the same article. In particular, there is a great dispute on whether there is a causal relationship between the cognizance of dereliction of duty and the determination of significant loss. At the same time, the judicial cognizance of dereliction of duty is always worthy of attention and discussion. The controversy between the theorists and the practitioners can easily lead the court to make unreasonable judgments. Therefore, the author chooses a case of dereliction of duty and analyzes the related problems of the crime of dereliction of duty through the analysis of the case. The author analyzes the crime of dereliction of duty in the case of Wang So-yang and Jia Mou Yang. Taking this case as an example, by introducing the facts of the case and the focus of the dispute, this paper analyzes the meaning of "neglect of duty" and "significant loss", and probes into the causality of this case. At the same time, by analyzing the constitution of the crime and the problem of judicial cognizance of the crime of dereliction of duty, it is concluded that the behavior of Jia Me-yang is not "dereliction of duty". Jia Mou Yang conscientiously performed his duties in the decision to temporarily execute the criminal outside prison, and there was no act of serious irresponsibility, failure to perform or serious performance of his duties. Although there is also a great loss in this case, there is no causal relationship between Wang and Jia's behavior and "great loss". The facts of this case do not conform to the constitution of the crime and therefore do not constitute the crime of dereliction of duty. Although the analysis of the case has come to an end, there are many thought-provoking points in the case of dereliction of duty. For example, the provisions of the criminal law on the crime of dereliction of duty are too simple, and the crime of dereliction of duty and the crime of abuse of power coexist in the same article of the criminal law. In view of these legislative deficiencies, the author also gives his own suggestions, such as can enrich the description of the crime, the form of subjective guilt in the criminal law provisions, appropriately improve the legal penalty for the crime of neglect of duty, and so on.
【学位授予单位】：河北大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2016
【分类号】：D924.3

【相似文献】