概然性教唆行为的定性

发布时间：2018-08-02 15:23

【摘要】：近年来学术界对教唆理论问题的研究成果颇多，但其中绝大多数是从整体上对教唆犯问题进行研究，对概然性教唆这一特殊教唆类型的深入研究还是比较少,在司法实践中应当如何对其予以定性始终是观点各异，没有确切的答案，无法给予实务界打击类似犯罪以及保障犯罪分子人权提供足够的理论支撑。教唆故意范畴、教唆的具体内容方式、方法，与教唆犯罪指向的对象不确定时，被教唆人又没有实施被教唆的犯罪，那么怎么样对教唆人的教唆行为定性一直以来都是个没有定论的问题。因此，对概然性的教唆行为进行细致的研究和分析,有助于对其基本特征、表现形式、认定与处罚等问题的思考和深入研究，也有助于在司法实践中对共同犯罪中的教唆行为的准确的定性,以此来减少出现因定性不准确而导致不符合罪刑相适应原则的情况。本文主要从概然性教唆行为的概念、特征、表现形式的角度入手，进而探讨各方关于概然性教唆定性的不同观点，以寻求更完善地对概然性的教唆行为进行定性的方案。文章第一部分主要对概然性教唆行为进行大致的介绍，包括其概念、界定时需要着重把握的方面以及其与明确性教唆的本质区别。然后介绍了概然性教唆行为的表现形式，包括教唆故意范畴不确定、教唆犯罪行为内容不确定以及教唆犯罪指向的对象不确定这三类。在文章的第二部分，主要探讨了如何对概然性教唆行为定性的几种观点及其评析，其中分别评析了依被教唆人实行行为定性说、依教唆人主观定性说和主客观相结合说，，并在支持主客观相结合观点的基础上对概然性教唆的情形下可能出现的几种定性结果进行了分析，包括无罪、教唆未遂、实行过限这三种情形。第三部分主要阐述的是作者本人对于概然性教唆行为定性的看法。首先，从概然性教唆行为定性的理论依据出发，包括了考虑教唆人犯罪目的所产生的背景，理清教唆人的犯罪目的与被教唆人的犯罪手段之间的因果关系以及准确地对教唆行为与实行行为之间的事实要素中的差异作出判断。再在此基础上分别针对概然性教唆行为的三种表现形式作定性的具体分析。
[Abstract]:In recent years, there have been a lot of researches on the theory of abettor in academic circles, but most of them have studied the problem of abettor as a whole, and the deep research on this special type of abettor is still relatively few. In judicial practice, how to characterize it is always different, there is no definite answer, can not give practical circles to crack down on similar crimes and protect the human rights of criminals to provide sufficient theoretical support. The category of aiding intent, the specific contents and methods of abetment, and when the object of the instigated crime is not certain, the abettor does not commit the instigated crime, So how to instigator's abetting behavior has always been a question of uncertainty. Therefore, the detailed study and analysis of the instigating behavior of likelihood is helpful to the thinking and in-depth study of its basic characteristics, forms of expression, identification and punishment, etc. It is also helpful to the accurate characterization of the instigating behavior in the joint crime in judicial practice, so as to reduce the situation that the inaccuracy of the characterization leads to the inconformity with the principle of crime and punishment. This paper mainly starts with the concept, characteristics and forms of probable abetting, and then discusses the different views of all parties on the characterization of likelihood abetment, in order to seek a more perfect scheme for the characterization of probable abetting. In the first part of this paper, the author gives a general introduction to the generalized abetting behavior, including its concept, the aspects that need to be grasped and the essential difference between it and the explicit abettor. Then it introduces the forms of general abetting behavior, including the uncertainty of the category of aiding intention, the uncertainty of the content of the criminal act of abetting and the uncertainty of the object to which the abetting crime is directed. In the second part of the article, the author mainly discusses several views and comments on the qualitative nature of the generalized abetting act, in which, respectively, the qualitative theory of the act carried out by the instigated person, the subjective qualitative theory of the abetting person and the combination of subjective and objective theory are analyzed. On the basis of supporting the combination of subjective and objective views, this paper analyzes several possible qualitative results in the case of likelihood abetting, including innocence, attempted instigation and excessive restriction. The third part mainly describes the author's views on the qualitative nature of probable abettor. First of all, starting from the theoretical basis of the qualitative nature of the instigator, including the background of considering the criminal purpose of the abettor, The causality between the criminal purpose of the abettor and the criminal means of the instigated person and the difference in the factual elements between the abetting act and the abetting act are clarified and the difference between the instigator's criminal means and the instigator's criminal means is accurately judged. On the basis of this, the qualitative and concrete analysis of three forms of probable abetting behavior is made.
【学位授予单位】：湘潭大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2014
【分类号】：D914

【参考文献】