论入户盗窃中“户”的认定

发布时间：2018-08-06 15:47

【摘要】：根据《刑法修正案(八)》的规定,入户盗窃构成盗窃罪,既不受数额的限制,也不受次数的限制,至此入户盗窃被明文规定在刑法中。入户盗窃是一种严重危害社会的行为,不但侵犯了公民的财产权,还侵犯了公民的人身权和住宅安宁权。“户”是公民安身立命之所,是繁衍生息之地,是存放财物之处,也是公民防御和抵御危险的最后一道屏障。如果此场所遭到侵犯,公民的物质生活不但遭到破坏,精神生活也会蒙受巨大的损失,因此法律必须给予充分的保护。入户盗窃入罪是我国法治社会不断进步维护国家社会稳定的表现,也是积极响应人民群众呼声的表现。《刑法修正案(八)》把入户盗窃纳入盗窃罪的基本行为模式之一是基于更有力地打击和遏制这种犯罪的考量,为了更好的保护公民的财产权、人身权和住宅安宁权。本文从入户盗窃的立法目的着手对入户盗窃中“户”的范围进行研究,认为入户盗窃中的“户”指的是具有供他人家庭生活、提供权利保障、带来生活安定,并且与外界相对隔离、能够排除他人进入的场所。入户盗窃中的“户”具有四个特征：封闭性、私密性、排他性、家居性。家居性是“户”的核心特征、灵魂特征；封闭性是“户”的场所特征；而私密性和排他性则为“户”的权利特征。对于司法实践中出现的一些特殊场所是否可以认定为入户盗窃中“户”的范围,也是本文重点讨论的地方。由于特殊场所并非像居民住宅那样承载的完全是饮食起居的功能,因此必须要具体问题具体分析。笔者认为还应从“户”的本质特征上去考虑,第一,是否是居民日常生活的场所,第二,是否是一个能够提供个体私生活的安宁的场所。随着社会的发展,“户”的新的形式也可能不断的出现,争议也可能会出现,笔者认为只要结合“户”的四个特征,再辅以案件本身的特性,判断是否属于入户盗窃中的“户”的问题就会迎刃而解。
[Abstract]:According to the provisions of the Criminal Law Amendment (8), burglary constitutes the crime of larceny, which is neither limited by the amount nor limited by the number of times. So far, burglary has been expressly stipulated in the Criminal Law. Burglary is a serious act that harms the society. It not only infringes on the property rights of citizens, but also infringes on their personal rights and the right to peaceful residence. "Household" is a place where citizens live, where they multiply, where property is stored, and as the last barrier for citizens to defend themselves against danger. If the site is violated, the material life of citizens will not only be destroyed, but also the spiritual life will suffer great losses, so the law must give adequate protection. The crime of burglary is the manifestation of our country's society under the rule of law, which is constantly advancing and maintaining the social stability of the country. It is also a manifestation of responding positively to the voice of the masses. One of the basic behavior patterns of incorporating burglary into the crime of burglary is to better protect the property rights of citizens on the basis of more effective consideration of cracking down and containing such crimes. Personal and residential rights. Based on the legislative purpose of burglary, this paper studies the scope of "household" in burglary, and holds that the "household" in burglary refers to the provision of family life for others, to provide protection of rights, and to bring stability to life. And relative isolation with the outside world, can exclude others into the place. The "household" in the burglary has four characteristics: closed, private, exclusive and household. Household is the core characteristic of "household", soul characteristic; closeness is the place characteristic of "household"; privacy and exclusiveness are the right characteristic of "household". Whether some special places in judicial practice can be regarded as the scope of "households" in burglary is also discussed in this paper. Because the special place does not carry the function of eating and drinking and living like the resident residence, it must be analyzed concretely. The author thinks that the essential characteristics of "households" should be considered as follows: first, whether it is a place of daily life for residents, and second, whether it is a place of tranquillity that can provide private life for individuals. With the development of the society, new forms of "households" may also appear and disputes may arise. The author thinks that as long as the four characteristics of "households" are combined with the characteristics of the case itself, Judging whether it belongs to the "door" problem of burglary will be solved easily.
【学位授予单位】：内蒙古大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2014
【分类号】：D924.3

【参考文献】