当前位置:主页 > 法律论文 > 刑法论文 >

我国隐私权刑法保护问题研究

发布时间:2018-08-06 15:13
【摘要】:我们所说的隐私,就是指不愿意告诉别人或不方便告诉别人的事情。作为人的一项基本权利,隐私权不受侵犯是人类的基本要求。随着现代科学技术的迅猛发展和民主意识的不断进步,人们为了维护个人尊严以保护个人隐私的要求愈加强烈,而在现实社会中大量严重侵害公民个人隐私的行为正在严重影响我们的安全,采用的方式与手段越来越呈现多样化,它不仅侵犯了公民个人隐私权,而且也威胁到公民个人财产安全、社会管理秩序,,甚至公共安全。因此,运用民事、行政制裁手段已经无法对公民个人隐私进行有效的保护。而刑法作为社会防卫体系的最后一道屏障,也就应该对公民个人隐私权给予必要的关注。但是,从我国刑事立法来看,我国对公民隐私权刑法保护的力度远远不足以满足社会现实和司法实践的需要,保护状况也不容乐观。因此,本文首先从隐私权刑法保护的基本理论问题进行论述,其次,对隐私权刑法保护的现状进行分析,指出我国刑法在此方面的种种不足,然后,结合境外的立法先进模式,针对前面论述问题提出完善建议。 人是社会的“细胞”,社会的和谐发展是以人权能够得到充分保护为基础的,刑法保护隐私权也就是对基本人权的保护,但我国刑法对隐私权保护还差强人意,因此,本文认为,必须加大刑法对隐私权保护力度。对公民隐私权的刑法保护研究方向也具有很强的立法意义和实践意义。
[Abstract]:By privacy, we mean things that are unwilling or inconvenient to tell others. As a basic right of human beings, the right of privacy is not infringed is the basic requirements of human beings. With the rapid development of modern science and technology and the continuous progress of democratic consciousness, people's demands for personal dignity to protect their privacy have become increasingly strong. In the real society, a large number of serious violations of the privacy of citizens are seriously affecting our security, the ways and means are becoming more and more diversified, it not only infringes the individual privacy of citizens, And it also threatens the personal property of citizens, social order, and even public safety. Therefore, the use of civil, administrative sanctions has been unable to effectively protect the privacy of citizens. As the last barrier of social defense system, criminal law should pay attention to individual privacy. However, from the point of view of our criminal legislation, the criminal law protection of citizens' right to privacy is far from enough to meet the needs of social reality and judicial practice, and the situation of protection is not optimistic. Therefore, this paper first discusses the basic theoretical issues of the criminal law protection of the right to privacy, secondly, analyzes the present situation of the criminal law protection of the right to privacy, points out the shortcomings of our criminal law in this respect, and then combines with the advanced mode of overseas legislation. In view of the previous discussion of the problems proposed to improve the proposal. Human being is the "cell" of the society, the harmonious development of the society is based on the full protection of human rights, and the protection of the right to privacy by criminal law is the protection of basic human rights, but the protection of the right to privacy is not satisfactory in our criminal law, therefore, This article thinks, must increase the criminal law to the privacy protection dynamics. The research direction of criminal law protection of citizens' right to privacy also has strong legislative and practical significance.
【学位授予单位】:贵州民族大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2014
【分类号】:D924.3

【参考文献】

相关期刊论文 前10条

1 赵秉志;;略论刑法的机能[J];北京联合大学学报(人文社会科学版);2006年02期

2 梁旭红;民事司法程序中当事人的隐私权保护[J];当代法学;1999年03期

3 黄进发;;隐私权从私法保护到公法保护的发展[J];东南学术;2012年03期

4 王娟;;论隐私权的独立性[J];法律适用;2012年02期

5 马特;;无隐私即无自由——现代情景下的个人隐私保护[J];法学杂志;2007年05期

6 王利明;;隐私权概念的再界定[J];法学家;2012年01期

7 梁晓明;建议设立侵犯公民隐私权罪[J];法学;1995年05期

8 李晓瑜;;中国隐私权之刑法保护[J];法制与社会;2012年19期

9 黄瑶;陈亮;;浅谈我国隐私权保护的不足与完善[J];贵阳市委党校学报;2007年01期

10 刘兰兰;;“人肉搜索”中的权利冲突探析[J];广西政法管理干部学院学报;2012年01期

相关博士学位论文 前3条

1 聂生奎;个人信息保护法律问题研究[D];中国政法大学;2009年

2 王芳;美国刑事诉讼法对隐私权的保护[D];山东大学;2012年

3 梁光勇;隐私的限制与保护[D];山东大学;2013年



本文编号:2168119

资料下载
论文发表

本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/xingfalunwen/2168119.html


Copyright(c)文论论文网All Rights Reserved | 网站地图 |

版权申明:资料由用户b775f***提供,本站仅收录摘要或目录,作者需要删除请E-mail邮箱bigeng88@qq.com