挪用公款罪中“归个人使用”的解释逻辑

发布时间：2018-08-08 13:31

【摘要】：对于挪用公款罪中的"归个人使用",我国的司法实践、刑法理论乃至立法机关传统上把其中的"个人"解释为公款利用人,把"使用"解释为三种类型的公款利用行为。同时,为了满足司法实践扩大该罪处罚范围的现实需要,先后出台的司法解释、立法解释不断扩张"归个人使用"的适用范围:将公款利用人扩张到企业、单位等非"个人"主体,将"挪而未用"、"挪而不用"等行为也作为犯罪来处理。但是,按照传统的解释逻辑,这样的做法始终有违反罪刑法定原则的嫌疑。如果把"归个人使用"中的"个人"解释为公款挪用人(即作为"个人"的国家工作人员),把"使用"解释为不按公款的规定用途而改变公款支配关系的行为(即公款"挪用"行为),就可以一方面满足扩大处罚范围的现实需要,另一方面排除相关司法解释、立法解释规定违反罪刑法定原则的嫌疑。
[Abstract]:In our country's judicial practice, the theory of criminal law and the legislature have traditionally interpreted the "individual" as the person who uses public funds, and the "use" as three types of public funds use behavior in the crime of misappropriating public funds. At the same time, in order to meet the practical needs of expanding the scope of punishment of the crime in judicial practice, the judicial interpretation has been issued successively, and the legislative interpretation has continuously expanded the scope of application of "belong to personal use": expanding public funds to enterprises. Units and other non-individual subjects, such as "move without use", "move but not" and other acts are also treated as a crime. However, according to traditional interpretation logic, such a practice is always suspected of violating the principle of legality. If the term "individual" in "for personal use" is interpreted as a misappropriation of public funds (i.e., a State official acting as a "person"), and "use" as an act of changing the relationship between public funds that does not serve the purposes specified in public funds ( That is, the act of "misappropriating" public funds), on the one hand, can meet the practical needs of expanding the scope of punishment. On the other hand, remove the relevant judicial interpretation, legislative interpretation of the violation of the principle of legality suspect.
【作者单位】：中国社会科学院法学研究所;
【分类号】：D924.392

【参考文献】