曲某敲诈勒索案评析

发布时间：2018-08-08 13:49

【摘要】：近年来,"访民敲诈勒索政府"系列案件受到社会公众的极大关注,判决结论成为社会公众和刑法学界关注的焦点。访民利用上访要挟政府索取财物的行为是否构成犯罪,是否构成敲诈勒索罪,对类似行为如何予以法律规制,是类似案件带来的疑问。本文以曲某敲诈勒索案为例,以利用上访要挟政府索取财物能否构成敲诈勒索罪问题为导向,以案件焦点分析为支点,以该案件带来的启示为归宿,希望能够为全面推进依法治国贡献一份绵薄之力。全文共分为四个部分。第一部分,绪论。该部分介绍了关于访民利用上访要挟政府行为与敲诈勒索罪关系问题的研究现状、研究意义和研究方法。第二部分,曲某敲诈勒索案简述。该部分对该案件基本情况、判决结果和争议焦点进行了介绍,对案件相关法律规范进行了分析。第三部分,曲某敲诈勒索案焦点分析。首先,在行为手段上,对曲某利用上访要挟政府的行为能否认定为敲诈勒索罪"威胁或者要挟"行为进行了分析;其次,在犯罪对象上,对政府能否作为对本案的犯罪对象进行了分析;最后,在主观目的上,对曲某主观目的是为了维权还是非法占有进行了分析。第四部分,曲某敲诈勒索案带来的启示。通过对本案的分析研究,本文认为应当区分不当上访行为与敲诈勒索罪的界限,出台司法解释解决本案类似行为的入罪问题和建立分类处理机制统一裁判标准来规制本案类似行为。
[Abstract]:In recent years, a series of cases of racketeering and extortion by visiting people have attracted great public attention, and the conclusion of judgment has become the focus of public and criminal law circles. Whether the behavior of extorting property from the government is a crime, whether it constitutes the crime of extortion, and how to regulate the similar behavior by law is a question brought by similar cases. In this paper, Qumou case of extortion is taken as an example, the problem of whether extortion is constituted by extortion from the government under the threat of petition, the focus of the case is taken as the fulcrum, and the enlightenment brought by the case is taken as the end-result. I hope to contribute a small part to promoting the rule of law in an all-round way. The full text is divided into four parts. The first part, introduction. This part introduces the research status, significance and research methods of the relationship between extortion and extortion. The second part, Qumou racketeering case brief. This part introduces the basic situation of the case, the result of judgment and the focus of dispute, and analyzes the relevant legal norms of the case. The third part, Qumou racketeering case focus analysis. First of all, in terms of behavior means, the author analyzes whether Qu-mou 's use of petition to blackmail the government can be regarded as "threat or blackmail" of the crime of extortion; secondly, on the object of the crime, Whether the government can be the object of the crime in this case; finally, in the subjective purpose, the subjective purpose of Qu-mou is to protect the rights or illegal possession of the analysis. The fourth part, Qumou racketeering case brings enlightenment. Through the analysis and study of this case, this paper thinks that we should distinguish the boundary between the improper petition behavior and the crime of extortion. The judicial interpretation is introduced to solve the incrimination of similar acts in this case and to establish the classification mechanism to unify the adjudication standard to regulate the similar acts in this case.
【学位授予单位】：延边大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2017
【分类号】：D920.5;D924.3

【相似文献】