贪污罪的立法史考察及其完善
发布时间：2018-08-11 16:22
【摘要】：十八大以来,我国反腐工作不断推向深处。国家工作人员作为我国社会主义建设的一个重要主体,国家工作人员利用职务便利将公共财物占为己有的犯罪行为不仅侵害了财产权,也侵害了职务的廉洁性。在对贪污贿赂犯罪加强执法和司法查处力度的同时,由于贪污贿赂犯罪的立法问题导致的在司法过程中的认定上存在着诸如犯罪主体的不当扩大、刑罚量刑幅度较大、刑罚处罚较轻等问题。如果不能有效地解决贪污罪的立法问题,不仅不利于我国当前反腐工作的进一步深化,更不利于我国法制建设的推进。 本文第一部分通过对我国贪污罪的立法史进行论述,较为详细的介绍了我国古代、近代以及当代贪污罪的立法规定的发展,并着重对1997年刑法关于贪污罪的修改进行了讨论；第二部分主要是通过对于当前我国贪污罪犯罪构成方面存在的两个问题进行了论证,并提出了将“伪造国家公文、证件担任了国家工作人员”从贪污罪犯罪主体中排除,以及将“公务行为高消费”纳入贪污罪行为类型两个观点,并对提出的观点进行了必要的讨论；第三部分主要通过将贪污罪与盗窃罪这一“官盗”与“民盗”在法定刑上的区别,对贪污罪法定刑的配置进行了讨论,并在此基础之上提出了笔者的四点具体构想。
[Abstract]:Since the 18th National Congress, China's anti-corruption work has been pushed to the depths. As an important subject in the socialist construction of our country, the state functionaries' crime of taking public property as their own by taking advantage of their duties not only infringes on property rights, but also infringes on the integrity of their posts. While strengthening the law enforcement and judicial investigation and punishment of corruption and bribery crimes, due to the legislative problems of corruption and bribery crimes, such as the improper expansion of the subject of the crime, the penalty and sentencing range is relatively large. The penalty is lighter and so on. If the legislation of corruption crime can not be solved effectively, it will not only be unfavorable to the further deepening of anti-corruption work in our country, but also unfavorable to the advancement of our country's legal system construction. The first part of this paper discusses the legislative history of the corruption crime in China, introduces in detail the development of the legislative provisions of the corruption crime in ancient, modern and contemporary China, and emphatically discusses the revision of the embezzlement crime in the Criminal Law of 1997. The second part mainly discusses the two problems existing in the constitution of corruption crime in our country, and puts forward that "forgery of state document and certificate as state functionary" should be excluded from the subject of corruption crime. As well as the "high consumption of official conduct" into the corruption crime type of two views, and put forward the point of view to carry on the necessary discussion; The third part mainly through the embezzlement crime and the theft this "official theft" and "the people theft" in the legal punishment difference, has carried on the discussion to the embezzlement crime legal punishment disposition, and has put forward the author's four concrete ideas on this foundation.
【学位授予单位】：扬州大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2014
【分类号】：D924.392
本文编号：2177549
[Abstract]:Since the 18th National Congress, China's anti-corruption work has been pushed to the depths. As an important subject in the socialist construction of our country, the state functionaries' crime of taking public property as their own by taking advantage of their duties not only infringes on property rights, but also infringes on the integrity of their posts. While strengthening the law enforcement and judicial investigation and punishment of corruption and bribery crimes, due to the legislative problems of corruption and bribery crimes, such as the improper expansion of the subject of the crime, the penalty and sentencing range is relatively large. The penalty is lighter and so on. If the legislation of corruption crime can not be solved effectively, it will not only be unfavorable to the further deepening of anti-corruption work in our country, but also unfavorable to the advancement of our country's legal system construction. The first part of this paper discusses the legislative history of the corruption crime in China, introduces in detail the development of the legislative provisions of the corruption crime in ancient, modern and contemporary China, and emphatically discusses the revision of the embezzlement crime in the Criminal Law of 1997. The second part mainly discusses the two problems existing in the constitution of corruption crime in our country, and puts forward that "forgery of state document and certificate as state functionary" should be excluded from the subject of corruption crime. As well as the "high consumption of official conduct" into the corruption crime type of two views, and put forward the point of view to carry on the necessary discussion; The third part mainly through the embezzlement crime and the theft this "official theft" and "the people theft" in the legal punishment difference, has carried on the discussion to the embezzlement crime legal punishment disposition, and has put forward the author's four concrete ideas on this foundation.
【学位授予单位】：扬州大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2014
【分类号】：D924.392
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 陈正云;罪犯的犯罪决策的经济分析[J];法律科学(西北政法学院学报);1996年06期
2 郑晓峰;;论我国贪污罪法定刑的完善[J];党史博采(理论);2006年03期
3 王海侠;;我国贪污罪与盗窃罪法定刑配置之比较[J];法制与经济(中旬刊);2010年02期
4 翟长玺;贪污罪的法定刑研究[J];河北法学;2002年01期
5 董邦俊,唐子艳,杨剑;我国古代贪污罪立法的考察及反思[J];湖北警官学院学报;2005年02期
6 白建军;;裸刑均值的意义[J];法学研究;2010年06期
7 赵秉志;彭新林;;关于许霆案件的法理问题思考[J];刑法论丛;2008年02期
8 王瑞君;;量刑规范化面临的问题与对策构建[J];法学论坛;2010年01期
9 周飞;;关于贪污罪处罚方面的几点问题[J];泰山乡镇企业职工大学学报;2011年04期
10 陈星;职务犯罪的经济学分析[J];中国刑事法杂志;2000年01期
，本文编号：2177549
本文链接：https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/xingfalunwen/2177549.html
