我国刑法中聚众犯罪处罚差异性研究
发布时间：2018-08-11 19:56
【摘要】：聚众犯罪是我国刑法中一种常见的犯罪类型。由于与其他一些犯罪相比，其发生的频率相对较低，加之各个聚众犯罪散落于刑法分则中，理论和实务界对聚众犯罪的司法适用并未形成统一的认识，因此，学界关于聚众犯罪研究的热衷度并不高，有关聚众犯罪处罚差异性的研究更是稀少，甚至找不到直接的研究资料。本文试以此为切入点，论述存在此种差异性的合理依据和意义，为司法实践的合理运用找到理论根据。 具体而言，本文共分为三个部分： 第一部分：聚众犯罪处罚差异性之概述。本章结合现有刑法分则的规定，从聚众犯罪处罚范围的差异和聚众犯罪主体法定刑的差异两个角度对聚众犯罪进行分类。当然，进行分类的前提是正确梳理聚众犯罪的特征，明晰聚众犯罪的范围，认识聚众犯罪的主体。 第二部分：聚众犯罪处罚差异性之合理性论证。本章探讨了存在差异性的原因，共从法益侵害差异、被害人过错、处罚和预防犯罪必要性和刑罚轻缓化四个方面阐述此种差异性的依据，并在此基础上分析处罚差异性的立法意义和司法意义。 第三部分：聚众犯罪处罚差异性之实践运用。本章主要解读在司法实践中对聚众犯罪的认定。该部分以存在不同责任主体为标准将聚众犯罪分为三类，并结合典型罪名的具体案例，还原司法实践中对聚众犯罪的认定过程。
[Abstract]:Mass crime is a common type of crime in Chinese criminal law. As compared with some other crimes, the frequency of their occurrence is relatively low, and each crime of mass crime is scattered in the special provisions of criminal law, the theory and practice circles have not formed a unified understanding of the judicial application of mass crime, therefore, There is not a high degree of enthusiasm for the study of mass crime in academic circles, and the research on the difference of punishment of crime gathering is even less, or even the direct research materials can not be found. This paper tries to use this as a starting point to discuss the reasonable basis and significance of the existence of such differences, to find a theoretical basis for the rational use of judicial practice. Specifically, this paper is divided into three parts: the first part: summary of the difference of crime punishment. Combined with the provisions of the existing criminal law, this chapter classifies mass crime from two aspects: the difference of punishment scope and the legal punishment of the subject of mass crime. Of course, the premise of classification is to correctly sort out the characteristics of mass crime, clear the scope of mass crime, and understand the subject of mass crime. The second part: the rationality demonstration of the difference of crime punishment. This chapter discusses the reasons for the difference, and expounds the basis of the difference from four aspects: the difference of legal interests, the fault of the victim, the necessity of punishment and the prevention of crime, and the mitigation of punishment. On this basis, the legislative and judicial significance of the difference of punishment is analyzed. The third part: the practice and application of the difference of crime punishment. This chapter mainly interprets the cognizance of mass crime in judicial practice. In this part, the crime of mass gathering is divided into three categories according to the standards of the existence of different subjects of responsibility, and combined with the specific cases of typical charges, the identification process of mass crime in judicial practice is reduced.
【学位授予单位】：华侨大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2014
【分类号】：D924.3
本文编号：2178081
[Abstract]:Mass crime is a common type of crime in Chinese criminal law. As compared with some other crimes, the frequency of their occurrence is relatively low, and each crime of mass crime is scattered in the special provisions of criminal law, the theory and practice circles have not formed a unified understanding of the judicial application of mass crime, therefore, There is not a high degree of enthusiasm for the study of mass crime in academic circles, and the research on the difference of punishment of crime gathering is even less, or even the direct research materials can not be found. This paper tries to use this as a starting point to discuss the reasonable basis and significance of the existence of such differences, to find a theoretical basis for the rational use of judicial practice. Specifically, this paper is divided into three parts: the first part: summary of the difference of crime punishment. Combined with the provisions of the existing criminal law, this chapter classifies mass crime from two aspects: the difference of punishment scope and the legal punishment of the subject of mass crime. Of course, the premise of classification is to correctly sort out the characteristics of mass crime, clear the scope of mass crime, and understand the subject of mass crime. The second part: the rationality demonstration of the difference of crime punishment. This chapter discusses the reasons for the difference, and expounds the basis of the difference from four aspects: the difference of legal interests, the fault of the victim, the necessity of punishment and the prevention of crime, and the mitigation of punishment. On this basis, the legislative and judicial significance of the difference of punishment is analyzed. The third part: the practice and application of the difference of crime punishment. This chapter mainly interprets the cognizance of mass crime in judicial practice. In this part, the crime of mass gathering is divided into three categories according to the standards of the existence of different subjects of responsibility, and combined with the specific cases of typical charges, the identification process of mass crime in judicial practice is reduced.
【学位授予单位】：华侨大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2014
【分类号】：D924.3
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前9条
1 樊建民;;聚众犯罪若干问题探析[J];公民与法(法学版);2009年06期
2 初红漫;;论被害人过错影响刑事责任之正当依据[J];河北法学;2012年01期
3 邹江江;;聚众犯罪与聚众性之解构[J];湖北大学学报(哲学社会科学版);2012年03期
4 刘德法;孔德琴;;关于聚众犯罪客观行为的司法认定[J];中国检察官;2009年01期
5 史卫忠;;简论聚众型犯罪[J];人民检察;2011年09期
6 刘德法;孔德琴;;论聚众犯罪的概念和法律特征[J];河南省政法管理干部学院学报;2009年03期
7 王志亮;张俊霞;;呼市越狱案的定性探讨[J];犯罪研究;2010年06期
8 王新清;袁小刚;;论刑事案件中的被害人过错[J];中国刑事法杂志;2008年02期
9 李祖华;;聚众犯罪若干问题辨析[J];中国刑事法杂志;2009年03期
，本文编号：2178081
本文链接：https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/xingfalunwen/2178081.html
