论盗回本人财物且未索赔行为不构成盗窃罪
发布时间：2018-08-14 09:23
【摘要】："非法占有目的"是盗窃罪的不成文构成要件要素,判断行为人取回自己所有而被他人合法占有财物的行为是否具有非法占有目的,以行为人是否进行事后索赔作为判断标准具有可行性,且行为人事后索赔获得的数额即是非法占有数额。质权人占有质物所产生的利益数额具有不确定性,无法认定破坏占有所造成的具体损失数额是否达到盗窃罪的起刑点。民间借贷纠纷若能够运用前置法解决则不宜轻易将其纳入刑法评价体系。
[Abstract]:"the purpose of illegal possession" is an important element of the unwritten elements of the crime of larceny, which determines whether the act of the actor taking back his own property and being legally possessed by another person has the purpose of illegal possession. It is feasible to judge whether the actor made a claim after the event, and the amount obtained by the actor after the claim is the amount of illegal possession. The amount of interest generated by the possessor of the pledge is uncertain and it is impossible to determine whether the amount of specific loss caused by the destruction of possession reaches the starting point of the crime of larceny. If the folk loan dispute can be solved by the former method, it should not be easily included in the criminal law evaluation system.
【作者单位】： 华东政法大学研究生教育学院;华东师范大学高等教育研究所;
【分类号】：D924.3;D920.5
本文编号：2182413
[Abstract]:"the purpose of illegal possession" is an important element of the unwritten elements of the crime of larceny, which determines whether the act of the actor taking back his own property and being legally possessed by another person has the purpose of illegal possession. It is feasible to judge whether the actor made a claim after the event, and the amount obtained by the actor after the claim is the amount of illegal possession. The amount of interest generated by the possessor of the pledge is uncertain and it is impossible to determine whether the amount of specific loss caused by the destruction of possession reaches the starting point of the crime of larceny. If the folk loan dispute can be solved by the former method, it should not be easily included in the criminal law evaluation system.
【作者单位】： 华东政法大学研究生教育学院;华东师范大学高等教育研究所;
【分类号】：D924.3;D920.5
【相似文献】
相关期刊论文 前3条
1 荀毅;;诈骗与合同诈骗的区别及非法占有目的的认定——以王火红诈骗案为例[J];新西部(理论版);2013年20期
2 杨春萍;刘华洁;;论合同诈骗罪中非法占有目的的认定——以孙某合同诈骗案为例[J];法制与社会;2014年03期
3 ;[J];;年期
相关硕士学位论文 前3条
1 吴兴鼐;“吴英集资案”非法占有目的认定[D];南京师范大学;2014年
2 傅迪;“机场黄金案”评析[D];湖南大学;2014年
3 张鸽子;蔡某等抢劫案评析[D];湖南大学;2013年
，本文编号：2182413
本文链接：https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/xingfalunwen/2182413.html
