论刑法中的“煽动”
发布时间：2018-08-14 13:19
【摘要】：煽动指通过一定的方式,比如鼓励、命令、敦促、请求、建议、引诱等,去怂恿、鼓动他人,希望他人信任其所表达的内容并实施该内容所指向的目标行为。煽动型犯罪与其他犯罪相比,有其特殊性,煽动行为一般是发表言论等表意性行为,当人们谈及言论往往会谈及言论自由以及包含言论自由在内的表达自由,故煽动行为往往关系着公民的表达自由。因此,应该明确“煽动”入罪的界限,在惩罚犯罪与保障公民表达自由之间达到平衡。既不能为了惩罚犯罪而在煽动立法时任意扩大煽动的外延,也不能为了表达的绝对自由而放弃对煽动行为的处罚。当表达自由明显越界时,国家有权予以规范和惩罚,煽动入罪便是最重要的惩罚手段。同时,因为刑法中的罪刑法定原则,通过惩罚滥用表达自由行为划定表达自由的行为边界,亦是对表达自由的一种保障。本文分为四个部分:第一部分是煽动概述。首先对煽动进行界定;其次对煽动与教唆进行比较;然后阐述煽动入罪的必要性,它既是惩治犯罪的需要,也是对宪法权利的保障;最后论述了煽动入罪的理论基础:未完成罪理论与危险犯理论。第二部分通过研究域外国家几种主要的煽动型犯罪类型,分析国外对煽动行为的刑法规制,并得出启示:煽动立法(入罪)的基本趋势是国家越来越注重对表达自由的保护,严格界定煽动的内涵,设立抗辩理由与例外条款为一些不应受刑法规制但可能会造成不良后果的行为出罪。第三部分分析我国对煽动的刑法规制。我国刑法没有设立煽动他人犯罪罪,而是代之以教唆犯;我国刑法分则设立了七宗煽动型犯罪,这是典型煽动;此外,一些聚众犯罪与言论犯罪中也可能包含煽动行为,这是非典型煽动。第四部分提出完善我国煽动刑法规制的建议:设立公共场合煽动他人犯罪罪,明确煽动入罪的界限以及增设例外条款。
[Abstract]:Incitement means encouraging, urging, requesting, advising, luring, etc., by means of encouragement, command, urge, suggestion, inducement, etc., in order to encourage others to believe in what they are expressing and to carry out the targeted act of that content. Compared with other crimes, seditious crime has its own particularity. Incitement generally refers to expressive acts such as speech. When people talk about speech, they often talk about freedom of speech and freedom of expression, which includes freedom of speech. Therefore, incitement is often related to the freedom of expression of citizens. Therefore, we should make clear the boundary of "inciting" incrimination and strike a balance between punishing crime and guaranteeing citizens' freedom of expression. Neither the extension of incitement in the legislation of incitement should be arbitrarily expanded in order to punish the offence, nor the punishment of incitement should be waived for the sake of absolute freedom of expression. When freedom of expression clearly crosses the border, the state has the right to regulate and punish it, and incitement is the most important punishment. At the same time, because of the principle of legality in criminal law, it is also a guarantee for freedom of expression to delimit the boundary of freedom of expression by punishing the abuse of freedom of expression. This article is divided into four parts: the first part is an overview of incitement. Firstly, it defines incitement; secondly, it compares incitement with abetting; then it expounds the necessity of inciting incrimination, which is not only the need of punishing crime, but also the guarantee of constitutional right. Finally, it discusses the theoretical basis of sedition: the theory of unfinished crime and the theory of dangerous crime. In the second part, by studying several main types of seditious crimes in foreign countries, the author analyzes the criminal law regulation of sedition in foreign countries, and concludes that the basic trend of sedition legislation is that the state pays more and more attention to the protection of freedom of expression. Strictly defining the connotation of incitement, establishing defense and exception clauses are crimes that should not be regulated by criminal law but may result in adverse consequences. The third part analyzes the criminal regulation of sedition in our country. The criminal law of our country does not establish the crime of inciting others to commit crimes, but it is replaced by an abettor; the sub-rule of our criminal law sets up seven seditious crimes, which are typical incitement; in addition, some mass crimes and speech crimes may also contain seditious acts. This is atypical incitement. The fourth part puts forward the suggestions of perfecting the regulation of the criminal law of sedition in our country: setting up the crime of inciting others in public, clarifying the limits of the crime of inciting and adding the exception clause.
【学位授予单位】：江西理工大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2017
【分类号】：D924.3
本文编号：2182978
[Abstract]:Incitement means encouraging, urging, requesting, advising, luring, etc., by means of encouragement, command, urge, suggestion, inducement, etc., in order to encourage others to believe in what they are expressing and to carry out the targeted act of that content. Compared with other crimes, seditious crime has its own particularity. Incitement generally refers to expressive acts such as speech. When people talk about speech, they often talk about freedom of speech and freedom of expression, which includes freedom of speech. Therefore, incitement is often related to the freedom of expression of citizens. Therefore, we should make clear the boundary of "inciting" incrimination and strike a balance between punishing crime and guaranteeing citizens' freedom of expression. Neither the extension of incitement in the legislation of incitement should be arbitrarily expanded in order to punish the offence, nor the punishment of incitement should be waived for the sake of absolute freedom of expression. When freedom of expression clearly crosses the border, the state has the right to regulate and punish it, and incitement is the most important punishment. At the same time, because of the principle of legality in criminal law, it is also a guarantee for freedom of expression to delimit the boundary of freedom of expression by punishing the abuse of freedom of expression. This article is divided into four parts: the first part is an overview of incitement. Firstly, it defines incitement; secondly, it compares incitement with abetting; then it expounds the necessity of inciting incrimination, which is not only the need of punishing crime, but also the guarantee of constitutional right. Finally, it discusses the theoretical basis of sedition: the theory of unfinished crime and the theory of dangerous crime. In the second part, by studying several main types of seditious crimes in foreign countries, the author analyzes the criminal law regulation of sedition in foreign countries, and concludes that the basic trend of sedition legislation is that the state pays more and more attention to the protection of freedom of expression. Strictly defining the connotation of incitement, establishing defense and exception clauses are crimes that should not be regulated by criminal law but may result in adverse consequences. The third part analyzes the criminal regulation of sedition in our country. The criminal law of our country does not establish the crime of inciting others to commit crimes, but it is replaced by an abettor; the sub-rule of our criminal law sets up seven seditious crimes, which are typical incitement; in addition, some mass crimes and speech crimes may also contain seditious acts. This is atypical incitement. The fourth part puts forward the suggestions of perfecting the regulation of the criminal law of sedition in our country: setting up the crime of inciting others in public, clarifying the limits of the crime of inciting and adding the exception clause.
【学位授予单位】：江西理工大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2017
【分类号】：D924.3
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 李哲;张一;;中英煽动恐怖主义犯罪比较[J];国家检察官学院学报;2016年05期
2 孙浩文;;煽动实施恐怖活动罪相关问题研究[J];太原学院学报(社会科学版);2016年01期
3 卢有学;吴永辉;;极端主义犯罪辨析——基础理论与立法剖析[J];西南政法大学学报;2015年02期
4 胡杰;;公共事项言论入罪界限初探[J];理论界;2013年06期
5 班克庆;;浅议煽动恐怖活动罪[J];云南行政学院学报;2012年03期
6 陈兴良;;“风险刑法”与刑法风险:双重视角的考察[J];法商研究;2011年04期
7 孟庆华;;煽动暴力抗拒法律实施罪的几个构成要件问题探讨[J];江西科技师范学院学报;2008年02期
8 叶小琴;;略论煽动分裂国家罪[J];华中农业大学学报(社会科学版);2006年03期
9 李炳烁;言论自由的限度理论[J];江苏大学学报(社会科学版);2005年05期
10 彭剑鸣,邓万飞;论煽动民族仇恨、民族歧视罪[J];贵州民族研究;2002年02期
相关博士学位论文 前2条
1 陈小彪;言论自由的刑法边界[D];西南政法大学;2012年
2 班克庆;煽动型犯罪研究[D];苏州大学;2012年
相关硕士学位论文 前2条
1 沈yN雪;论宣扬恐怖主义、极端主义、煽动实施恐怖活动罪[D];华东政法大学;2016年
2 李政;煽动性言论的刑法边界[D];山东大学;2016年
，本文编号：2182978
本文链接：https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/xingfalunwen/2182978.html
