强制猥亵、侮辱罪疑难问题研究
发布时间:2018-08-14 18:51
【摘要】:我国《刑法修正案(九)》将刑法典第二百三十七条规定的强制猥亵、侮辱妇女罪修改为强制猥亵、侮辱罪。至此,强制猥亵的对象扩大至他人,而强制侮辱的对象仍局限于妇女。这一修改的显著意义在于成年男性的性自主权将前所未有地得到刑法保护。但无论是在理论界还是司法实践中,强制猥亵、侮辱罪都暴露出诸多问题亟需解决。本文将采用比较分析法、案例分析法与文献分析法,对国内外的研究成果进行对比分析,了解不同时期不同学者对于本罪的认识,分别研究本罪呈现的疑难问题。笔者认为,研究一个罪名具体的犯罪构成要件,首先要准确把握刑法设置此罪名的目的,明确刑法所要保护的法益。因此文章首先通过案例引出问题,对比域内域外对此持有的不同看法,来研究强制猥亵、侮辱罪所保护的法益。强制猥亵、侮辱行为是对狭义性交以外的性自主权的侵犯,这种性自主权是边缘性行为的自主决定权,因此本罪所保护的法益正是他人边缘性行为的自主决定权。在探究本罪在客观方面的表现形式时,笔者认为,这种猥亵侮辱行为是对一切边缘性行为自主权侵犯。因而需要分析本罪中“猥亵”行为与“侮辱”行为的关系。在对本罪主观方面进行研究时,通过实践中发生的案件为例,探讨司法实践中将本罪作为倾向犯所带来的问题,在阐明本罪并非倾向犯的同时,对行为是否构成犯罪、构成何种犯罪作出正确界定。本文还将通过案例引出本罪与强奸罪的罪间界限问题,通过研究刑法所保护的法益、行为人的行为方式以及主观目的等多个方面对二罪进行比较,合理的界分二罪之间的关系,以期给司法实践带来一些启发。
[Abstract]:The Criminal Law Amendment (9) modifies the crime of forcible indecency and insulting women as the crime of compulsory indecency and insulting as stipulated in Article 237 of the Criminal Code. At this point, the object of forced indecency extends to others, while the object of forced insult is still confined to women. The significance of this amendment is that the sexual autonomy of adult men will be protected by criminal law as never before. However, in theory and judicial practice, the crime of compulsory indecency and insult exposes many problems that need to be solved. This paper will use comparative analysis, case analysis and literature analysis, comparative analysis of domestic and foreign research results, to understand the different periods of understanding of the crime of different scholars, respectively, to study the problems presented by this crime. The author believes that to study the specific elements of a crime, first of all, it is necessary to accurately grasp the purpose of setting up the crime in criminal law, and make clear the legal interests to be protected by the criminal law. Therefore, the article first through the case leads to the question, contrasts the domain outside holds the different view to this, studies the compulsory indecent assault, insults the legal interest which protects. Compulsory indecency and insult is the infringement of sexual autonomy other than narrow sexual intercourse, which is the independent decision of marginal sexual behavior, so the legal interest protected by this crime is the independent decision of others' marginal sexual behavior. In exploring the objective manifestations of this crime, the author believes that this kind of indecent and insulting behavior is an infringement on the autonomy of all marginal acts. Therefore, it is necessary to analyze the relationship between obscenity and insults in this crime. In the study of the subjective aspect of the crime, through the practice of cases as an example, to explore the judicial practice of this crime as a tendency to commit the problem, in order to clarify that the crime is not inclined to commit at the same time, whether the act constitutes a crime, What kind of crime constitutes a correct definition. This paper also leads to the boundary between this crime and the crime of rape through the case, through the study of the legal interests protected by the criminal law, the behavior mode of the perpetrator and the subjective purpose and so on, carries on the comparison to the two crimes, reasonable boundary divides the two crimes between the relations. In order to bring some inspiration to the judicial practice.
【学位授予单位】:辽宁大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2017
【分类号】:D924.3
[Abstract]:The Criminal Law Amendment (9) modifies the crime of forcible indecency and insulting women as the crime of compulsory indecency and insulting as stipulated in Article 237 of the Criminal Code. At this point, the object of forced indecency extends to others, while the object of forced insult is still confined to women. The significance of this amendment is that the sexual autonomy of adult men will be protected by criminal law as never before. However, in theory and judicial practice, the crime of compulsory indecency and insult exposes many problems that need to be solved. This paper will use comparative analysis, case analysis and literature analysis, comparative analysis of domestic and foreign research results, to understand the different periods of understanding of the crime of different scholars, respectively, to study the problems presented by this crime. The author believes that to study the specific elements of a crime, first of all, it is necessary to accurately grasp the purpose of setting up the crime in criminal law, and make clear the legal interests to be protected by the criminal law. Therefore, the article first through the case leads to the question, contrasts the domain outside holds the different view to this, studies the compulsory indecent assault, insults the legal interest which protects. Compulsory indecency and insult is the infringement of sexual autonomy other than narrow sexual intercourse, which is the independent decision of marginal sexual behavior, so the legal interest protected by this crime is the independent decision of others' marginal sexual behavior. In exploring the objective manifestations of this crime, the author believes that this kind of indecent and insulting behavior is an infringement on the autonomy of all marginal acts. Therefore, it is necessary to analyze the relationship between obscenity and insults in this crime. In the study of the subjective aspect of the crime, through the practice of cases as an example, to explore the judicial practice of this crime as a tendency to commit the problem, in order to clarify that the crime is not inclined to commit at the same time, whether the act constitutes a crime, What kind of crime constitutes a correct definition. This paper also leads to the boundary between this crime and the crime of rape through the case, through the study of the legal interests protected by the criminal law, the behavior mode of the perpetrator and the subjective purpose and so on, carries on the comparison to the two crimes, reasonable boundary divides the two crimes between the relations. In order to bring some inspiration to the judicial practice.
【学位授予单位】:辽宁大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2017
【分类号】:D924.3
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 党日红;;关于强制猥亵、侮辱罪的认定[J];中华女子学院学报;2016年04期
2 赵俊甫;;猥亵犯罪审判实践中若干争议问题探究——兼论《刑法修正案(九)》对猥亵犯罪的修改[J];法律适用;2016年07期
3 汪雪城;;新强制猥亵罪的法理解读和规范评价——兼评《刑法修正案(九)》第十三条第一款之规定[J];福建法学;2016年02期
4 陈家林;;《刑法修正案(九)》修正后的强制猥亵、侮辱罪解析[J];苏州大学学报(哲学社会科学版);2016年03期
5 张明楷;;也谈客观归责理论 兼与周光权、刘艳红教授商榷[J];中外法学;2013年02期
6 张明楷;;结果无价值论的法益观 与周光权教授商榷[J];中外法学;2012年01期
7 周光权;;行为无价值论的法益观[J];中外法学;2011年05期
8 陈兴良;;客观未遂论的滥觞——一个学术史的考察[J];法学家;2011年04期
9 张明楷;;实质解释论的再提倡[J];中国法学;2010年04期
10 张明楷;;规范的构成要件要素[J];法学研究;2007年06期
相关硕士学位论文 前3条
1 张s,
本文编号:2183793
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/xingfalunwen/2183793.html