论我国的刑事禁止令制度
发布时间：2018-08-19 19:15
【摘要】：刑事禁止令制度是我国刑法领域的一项有益尝试和积极创新,也是一项系统工程。在实施近三年的时间里,各有关立法、司法部门在进行积极的探索与完善,同时学术界对该制度进行不断的研究与探讨。本文正文分为五章,试图通过研究我国刑事禁止令的基本内涵,从而明确其性质、价值、适用原则、具体内容等,结合我国禁止令的具体实践,分析该制度目前存在的若干问题,针对存在的问题提出优化的建议,并对该制度的发展进行展望。 第一章开篇阐释刑事禁止令的基本内涵。首先概述了禁止令制度近几年在我国的发展进程,接着对国内外与禁止令类似的制度进行比较和辨析,包括保安处分制度、缓刑指示制度、附加刑制度等,从而明确我国刑事禁止令制度虽有借鉴其他制度的有益成分,但该制度确是我国刑法制度的一个独特创新。 第二章论述刑事禁止令的性质与价值。禁止令制度对我国刑法的完善和发展具有重大价值,由于禁止令的适用存在一定的裁量空间,为了实现个案正义,能够使禁止令的适用更加合法合理,充分发挥其制度功能,对我国禁止令的性质进行了归纳,特别强调了禁止令制度的系统性。 第三章与第四章是本文的重点,以系统性的思维和角度对我国刑事禁止令的适用进行剖析,包括禁止令适用的原则、条件、内容及程序。其中,将禁止令的适用条件分为法律条件与现实条件,重点对现实条件中的“人身危险性”的考量进行分析,并探讨了将“人身风险性”作为禁止令适用条件的可能。对宣告程序与执行程序进行分别论述的同时,也指出对禁止令的监督亟待完善。 第五章对我国刑事禁止令制度的现状进行系统分析,结合国内外的先进理论和有益经验,针对目前存在的问题提出该制度的优化路径,即进一步完善禁止令的立法与司法解释,尝试引入禁止令社会调查制度,建立健全司法与社会的联动机制。最后,对禁止令未来扩大适用范围及其系统性、动态性发展进行展望,以期我国刑事禁止令制度的进一步完善与发展。
[Abstract]:The system of criminal restraining order is a beneficial attempt and positive innovation in the field of criminal law in our country, and it is also a systematic project. In the past three years, the relevant legislation and judicial departments have been actively exploring and perfecting the system, while the academic circles have continued to study and explore the system. The text of this paper is divided into five chapters, which attempts to clarify its nature, value, applicable principle, concrete content and so on by studying the basic connotation of our country's criminal prohibition order, combining with the concrete practice of our country's prohibition order. This paper analyzes on some problems existing in the system, puts forward some suggestions for optimizing the existing problems, and looks forward to the development of the system. The first chapter explains the basic connotation of criminal injunction. First of all, it summarizes the development process of prohibition order system in our country in recent years, and then compares and discriminates the similar system at home and abroad with prohibition order system, including security measure system, probation instruction system, supplementary punishment system, etc. Therefore, it is clear that the criminal prohibition order system of our country is a unique innovation of our criminal law system, although it has the beneficial elements of drawing lessons from other systems. The second chapter discusses the nature and value of criminal injunction. Prohibition order system has great value to the perfection and development of criminal law of our country. Because there is certain discretion space in the application of prohibition order, in order to realize case justice, it can make the application of prohibition order more legal and reasonable, and give full play to its system function. This paper sums up the nature of prohibition order in our country, especially emphasizes the systematization of prohibition order system. The third chapter and the fourth chapter are the emphases of this paper, and analyze the application of the criminal prohibition order in our country with systematic thinking and angle, including the principle, condition, content and procedure of the prohibition order application. Among them, the applicable conditions of restraining orders are divided into legal conditions and realistic conditions, and the consideration of "personal dangerousness" in the actual conditions is analyzed, and the possibility of taking "personal risk" as the applicable condition of prohibition order is discussed. This paper discusses the proclamation procedure and execution procedure separately, and points out that the supervision of prohibition order needs to be perfected. The fifth chapter systematically analyzes the present situation of the criminal prohibition order system in our country, combines the advanced theory and beneficial experience at home and abroad, and puts forward the optimized path of the system in view of the existing problems, that is, to further perfect the legislative and judicial interpretation of the prohibition order. This paper attempts to introduce the prohibition order social investigation system and establish and perfect the linkage mechanism between the judiciary and the society. Finally, the author looks forward to the further improvement and development of the criminal prohibition order system in our country in order to expand the scope of application and its systematicness and dynamic development in the future.
【学位授予单位】：山东大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2014
【分类号】：D924.1
本文编号：2192568
[Abstract]:The system of criminal restraining order is a beneficial attempt and positive innovation in the field of criminal law in our country, and it is also a systematic project. In the past three years, the relevant legislation and judicial departments have been actively exploring and perfecting the system, while the academic circles have continued to study and explore the system. The text of this paper is divided into five chapters, which attempts to clarify its nature, value, applicable principle, concrete content and so on by studying the basic connotation of our country's criminal prohibition order, combining with the concrete practice of our country's prohibition order. This paper analyzes on some problems existing in the system, puts forward some suggestions for optimizing the existing problems, and looks forward to the development of the system. The first chapter explains the basic connotation of criminal injunction. First of all, it summarizes the development process of prohibition order system in our country in recent years, and then compares and discriminates the similar system at home and abroad with prohibition order system, including security measure system, probation instruction system, supplementary punishment system, etc. Therefore, it is clear that the criminal prohibition order system of our country is a unique innovation of our criminal law system, although it has the beneficial elements of drawing lessons from other systems. The second chapter discusses the nature and value of criminal injunction. Prohibition order system has great value to the perfection and development of criminal law of our country. Because there is certain discretion space in the application of prohibition order, in order to realize case justice, it can make the application of prohibition order more legal and reasonable, and give full play to its system function. This paper sums up the nature of prohibition order in our country, especially emphasizes the systematization of prohibition order system. The third chapter and the fourth chapter are the emphases of this paper, and analyze the application of the criminal prohibition order in our country with systematic thinking and angle, including the principle, condition, content and procedure of the prohibition order application. Among them, the applicable conditions of restraining orders are divided into legal conditions and realistic conditions, and the consideration of "personal dangerousness" in the actual conditions is analyzed, and the possibility of taking "personal risk" as the applicable condition of prohibition order is discussed. This paper discusses the proclamation procedure and execution procedure separately, and points out that the supervision of prohibition order needs to be perfected. The fifth chapter systematically analyzes the present situation of the criminal prohibition order system in our country, combines the advanced theory and beneficial experience at home and abroad, and puts forward the optimized path of the system in view of the existing problems, that is, to further perfect the legislative and judicial interpretation of the prohibition order. This paper attempts to introduce the prohibition order social investigation system and establish and perfect the linkage mechanism between the judiciary and the society. Finally, the author looks forward to the further improvement and development of the criminal prohibition order system in our country in order to expand the scope of application and its systematicness and dynamic development in the future.
【学位授予单位】：山东大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2014
【分类号】：D924.1
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 王强;戴立新;贾楠;;刑法禁止令的价值分析[J];法学;2011年11期
2 徐松青;张华;;刑法修正案八涉少条款解读与思考[J];青少年犯罪问题;2011年04期
3 田明;;论禁止令的司法适用[J];公民与法(法学版);2012年09期
4 徐琳琳;朱丽萍;;法院在发出刑事禁止令时应注意的问题研究[J];法制博览(中旬刊);2012年12期
5 卢建军;;人身危险性评估的基本方法[J];人民检察;2011年14期
6 陈敏;;关于人身安全保护裁定的思考[J];人民司法;2011年05期
7 孙振庆;汪忠玲;胡琳琳;;“禁止令”制度的价值与有效运行途径之探究[J];山东审判;2011年05期
8 胡云腾;周加海;喻海松;;《关于对判处管制、宣告缓刑的犯罪分子适用禁止令有关问题的规定(试行)》的理解与适用[J];人民司法;2011年13期
9 ;依法正确适用禁止令 确保非监禁刑执行效果——最高人民法院、最高人民检察院、公安部、司法部有关负责人就《关于对判处管制、宣告缓刑的犯罪分子适用禁止令有关问题的规定(试行)》答记者问[J];人民调解;2011年06期
10 廖福海;;我国刑事法治的又一重大进步——解析《刑法修正案(八)》[J];四川警察学院学报;2011年06期
，本文编号：2192568
本文链接：https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/xingfalunwen/2192568.html
