信息网络安全管理义务的刑法教义学展开
发布时间：2018-08-25 08:01
【摘要】：《刑法》第286条之一拒不履行网络安全管理义务罪体现了我国完善信息权刑法保护机制的努力。它所创设的,是网络服务提供者应承担、作为刑事作为义务的"网络信息安全保护义务",而非作为行政管理义务的"信息网络安全管理义务"。依照刑法规范明确性的要求,此义务核心内涵应为网络信息安全保护。为了避免义务边界不明的法治风险,应当以刑法教义学的规范判断为准绳,对其进行限缩解释。以具体义务类型为依据,以义务主体为前提,以法益保护目的为指引,以履行义务的可能性为保障,可以明晰此"网络信息安全保护义务"的边界,有效限制本罪处罚范围。
[Abstract]:The crime of refusing to fulfill the obligation of network security management in Article 286 of the Criminal Law embodies our country's efforts to perfect the criminal law protection mechanism of the right to information. What it creates is that network service providers should undertake "network information security protection obligations" as criminal obligations, not "information network security management obligations" as administrative obligations. According to the requirement of clarity of criminal law, the core content of this obligation should be network information security protection. In order to avoid the legal risk of unclear boundary of obligation, the criterion of dogmatics of criminal law should be taken as the criterion, and the limitation and contraction should be interpreted. Based on the specific obligation types, the subject of the obligation as the premise, the purpose of legal interest protection as the guide and the possibility of fulfilling the obligation as the guarantee, the boundary of this "obligation to protect network information security" can be clearly defined, and the scope of punishment for this crime can be effectively restricted.
【作者单位】： 武汉大学法学院;德国弗莱堡大学法学院;
【基金】：2016年国家建设高水平大学生派研究生项目(项目批准号:CSCNO.201606270181)
【分类号】：D924.3
本文编号：2202269
[Abstract]:The crime of refusing to fulfill the obligation of network security management in Article 286 of the Criminal Law embodies our country's efforts to perfect the criminal law protection mechanism of the right to information. What it creates is that network service providers should undertake "network information security protection obligations" as criminal obligations, not "information network security management obligations" as administrative obligations. According to the requirement of clarity of criminal law, the core content of this obligation should be network information security protection. In order to avoid the legal risk of unclear boundary of obligation, the criterion of dogmatics of criminal law should be taken as the criterion, and the limitation and contraction should be interpreted. Based on the specific obligation types, the subject of the obligation as the premise, the purpose of legal interest protection as the guide and the possibility of fulfilling the obligation as the guarantee, the boundary of this "obligation to protect network information security" can be clearly defined, and the scope of punishment for this crime can be effectively restricted.
【作者单位】： 武汉大学法学院;德国弗莱堡大学法学院;
【基金】：2016年国家建设高水平大学生派研究生项目(项目批准号:CSCNO.201606270181)
【分类号】：D924.3
【相似文献】
相关硕士学位论文 前1条
1 侯腾飞;拒不履行信息网络安全管理义务罪研究[D];河北师范大学;2017年
，本文编号：2202269
本文链接：https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/xingfalunwen/2202269.html
