危险驾驶罪的立法完善研究
发布时间：2018-08-25 08:09
【摘要】：2011年5月1日，《刑法修正案（八）》正式施行，社会各界关于危险驾驶罪新设的争议已暂告段落。但随着危险驾驶行为犯罪化在司法实践中慢慢暴露出来的一系列问题，使我国危险驾驶罪进入了一个新的反思阶段。与发达国家如美国、德国等国的立法相比，我国危险驾驶罪立法应该说存在方方面面的不足。本文试图通过考察危险驾驶罪的司法实践范本，从分析危险驾驶罪立法技术层面存在的问题入手，在充分借鉴和比较国外及我国港、澳、台地区先进立法经验的基础上，分析危险驾驶罪立法的缺陷与不足，并提出完善立法的若干建议，希望能够对我国危险驾驶罪的立法完善起到推动作用。本论文分为三个章节，第一章节是简要介绍了国内外有关危险驾驶类犯罪的立法概况和典型司法判例，并就危险驾驶罪在我国正式实施后的社会效果和司法效果进行了评价，通过对比研究两大法系典型国家的立法例来揭示我国危险驾驶罪设立后暴露出来的问题，引出对危险驾驶罪等涉及交通安全类刑事立法的质疑；第二部分是以湖南省长沙市某区法院2011年5月至2013年11月期间审结的所有危险驾驶罪案件为例，具体分析本罪在施行过程中存在的问题，以期通过实证的方式来揭示立法缺陷，并透过问题剖析危险驾驶罪在立法技术层面的先天性不足，提出一些有针对性的建议；第三部分在借鉴域外先进立法经验的基础上，提出了完善我国危险驾驶罪立法的若干建议，强调了危险驾驶罪设立的必要性和发展方向。本文还着重强调了笔者对于危险驾驶罪等交通肇事类犯罪主观方面属于故意或过失的理解，或许与主流观点不一致，仅供参考。
[Abstract]:On May 1, 2011, the Criminal Law Amendment (8) came into effect formally, and the controversy about the new establishment of dangerous driving crime has been temporarily put into effect. However, with the criminalization of dangerous driving behavior gradually exposed in judicial practice, a series of problems have brought the crime of dangerous driving into a new stage of reflection. Compared with the legislation of our country, the legislation of the crime of dangerous driving in our country should be said to have deficiencies in all aspects.This article attempts to examine the judicial practice model of the crime of dangerous driving, and to analyze the problems existing in the legislation of the crime of dangerous driving from the technical level. This paper is divided into three chapters, the first chapter is a brief introduction of the domestic and foreign legislation on dangerous driving crimes and typical judicial precedents, and on dangerous driving. This paper evaluates the social and judicial effects of the crime after its formal implementation in China, reveals the problems exposed after the establishment of the crime of dangerous driving by comparing the legislative examples of the typical countries of the two legal systems, and raises doubts about the criminal legislation concerning traffic safety such as the crime of dangerous driving; the second part is a case in Changsha, Hunan Province. Taking all dangerous driving crime cases concluded by district court from May 2011 to November 2013 as an example, this paper analyzes the existing problems in the implementation of this crime in order to reveal the legislative defects through empirical methods, and analyzes the congenital deficiency of dangerous driving crime in the legislative technical level through the problems, and puts forward some targeted suggestions. The third part puts forward some suggestions on perfecting the legislation of dangerous driving crime in our country on the basis of drawing lessons from foreign advanced legislative experience, and emphasizes the necessity and development direction of the establishment of dangerous driving crime. Inconsistent with the mainstream view, for reference only.
【学位授予单位】：贵州民族大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2014
【分类号】：D924.3
本文编号：2202287
[Abstract]:On May 1, 2011, the Criminal Law Amendment (8) came into effect formally, and the controversy about the new establishment of dangerous driving crime has been temporarily put into effect. However, with the criminalization of dangerous driving behavior gradually exposed in judicial practice, a series of problems have brought the crime of dangerous driving into a new stage of reflection. Compared with the legislation of our country, the legislation of the crime of dangerous driving in our country should be said to have deficiencies in all aspects.This article attempts to examine the judicial practice model of the crime of dangerous driving, and to analyze the problems existing in the legislation of the crime of dangerous driving from the technical level. This paper is divided into three chapters, the first chapter is a brief introduction of the domestic and foreign legislation on dangerous driving crimes and typical judicial precedents, and on dangerous driving. This paper evaluates the social and judicial effects of the crime after its formal implementation in China, reveals the problems exposed after the establishment of the crime of dangerous driving by comparing the legislative examples of the typical countries of the two legal systems, and raises doubts about the criminal legislation concerning traffic safety such as the crime of dangerous driving; the second part is a case in Changsha, Hunan Province. Taking all dangerous driving crime cases concluded by district court from May 2011 to November 2013 as an example, this paper analyzes the existing problems in the implementation of this crime in order to reveal the legislative defects through empirical methods, and analyzes the congenital deficiency of dangerous driving crime in the legislative technical level through the problems, and puts forward some targeted suggestions. The third part puts forward some suggestions on perfecting the legislation of dangerous driving crime in our country on the basis of drawing lessons from foreign advanced legislative experience, and emphasizes the necessity and development direction of the establishment of dangerous driving crime. Inconsistent with the mainstream view, for reference only.
【学位授予单位】：贵州民族大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2014
【分类号】：D924.3
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 周晶;;“危险驾驶”行为犯罪化分析[J];研究生法学;2011年06期
2 赵秉志;张磊;;“酒驾”危害行为的刑法立法对策[J];法学杂志;2009年12期
3 王志祥;敦宁;;危险驾驶行为入罪的合理性及其立法改进[J];河南大学学报(社会科学版);2012年02期
4 罗长斌;;我国危险驾驶罪醉驾标准之反思[J];湖北警官学院学报;2012年07期
5 王鹏祥;;危险驾驶罪的构成及其完善[J];河南师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版);2012年05期
6 陈春娥;;论危险驾驶罪的界定及其立法完善[J];湖北行政学院学报;2012年05期
7 柳忠卫;;论危险驾驶行为入罪的正当性与必要性[J];山东警察学院学报;2012年03期
8 夏明圣;魏在军;;醉酒驾驶犯罪的刑法完善[J];苏州大学学报(哲学社会科学版);2010年05期
9 张丽;;论危险驾驶罪的入刑风险[J];天府新论;2012年04期
10 李波;;当前我国危险驾驶罪考察与批判[J];犯罪研究;2012年01期
，本文编号：2202287
本文链接：https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/xingfalunwen/2202287.html
