死缓终身监禁制度研究

发布时间：2018-08-28 08:31

【摘要】：在全球废除死刑的浪潮下,积极探索死刑替代措施成为刑法学界面临的艰巨挑战。我国在《刑法修正案(九)》中提出的死缓终身监禁制度是继《刑法修正案(八)》死缓限制减刑后又一重要的死刑替代措施。随着死缓终身监禁制度的设立,对该制度的研究成为学术焦点。如死缓终身监禁制度能否替代死刑,死缓终身监禁制度本身的价值取向和价值定位以及死缓终身监禁制度在司法实务中如何适用等问题。笔者立足于死缓终身监禁制度已经设立的立场,通过五个章节的布局,用4万余字对以上相关进行了论述。具体如下:文章第一部分为死缓终身监禁制度的概述。主要通过对死缓终身监禁制度的立法背景介绍、探讨死缓终身监禁制度的概念和本质,将死缓终身监禁制度与死缓限制减刑制度和无期徒刑进行比较,从理论上先对死缓终身监禁制度勾画出大体轮廓。文章第二部分为死缓终身监禁措施的价值审视,死缓终身监禁制度其本质依然是刑罚的执行措施,刑罚作为刑法的有机组成部分应当符合刑法的基本价值取向—正义。笔者将从死缓终身监禁制度是否能能够满足报应论的要求,以及从死缓终身监禁制度是否能够实现一般预防和个别预防功能出发进行探讨,研究死缓终身监禁制度的正义性。文章第三部分为死缓终身监禁制度的规范解读,死缓终身监禁措施作为对死刑的立即执行的替代性措施,笔者主要从死缓终身监禁制度适用需用条件和诉讼时效角度出发,旨在研究死缓终身监禁措施的法律定位和司法适用。文章第四部分为死缓终身监禁制度的执行,监狱作为监禁刑的主要执行场所,应当正确处理终身监禁制度对监狱行刑带来新的挑战;笔者从死缓终身监禁制度规范本身的不认道性、行刑理念冲突和在行刑中可能存在的问题三个角度出发,对死缓终身监禁制度在监狱行刑中存在问题进行了分析。文章第五部分笔者主要根据死缓终身监禁制度存在缺陷和问题,结合第四部分分析基础上提出死缓终身监禁制度在立法层面、司法层面和刑罚行刑层面予以完善的建议。
[Abstract]:Under the tide of abolishing the death penalty in the world, actively exploring the alternative measures of death penalty has become a formidable challenge in the field of criminal law. The death penalty reprieve system proposed by our country in the Criminal Law Amendment (9) is an important alternative to the death penalty after the death penalty Amendment (8) which limits the commutation of death sentence. With the establishment of death-suspended life-imprisonment system, the research of this system has become the academic focus. Such as whether the death penalty can replace the death penalty, the value orientation and value orientation of the death penalty life imprisonment system and how to apply the death penalty life imprisonment system in the judicial practice and so on. Based on the stand that the death penalty suspended life imprisonment system has been set up, through the layout of five chapters, the author discusses the above correlation with more than 40,000 words. Specific as follows: the first part of the article is the summary of life imprisonment system. By introducing the legislative background of death reprieve life imprisonment system, this paper probes into the concept and essence of death reprieve life imprisonment system, and compares the death penalty suspension life imprisonment system with the death penalty limitation commutation system and life imprisonment system. In theory, the system of suspended life imprisonment is outlined. The second part of the article is to examine the value of the measure of life imprisonment. The essence of the system is still the execution of penalty. As an organic part of criminal law, penalty should conform to the basic value orientation of criminal law-justice. The author will discuss whether the system of life imprisonment can satisfy the demand of retribution and whether the system of life imprisonment can realize the function of general prevention and individual prevention, and study the justice of the system of life imprisonment. The third part of the article is the normative interpretation of the death penalty suspended life imprisonment system, the death penalty suspended life imprisonment measures as an alternative to the immediate execution of the death penalty, the author mainly from the death penalty suspended life imprisonment system applicable to the need for conditions and the perspective of the statute of limitations. The purpose of this paper is to study the legal orientation and judicial application of the measure of suspended life imprisonment. The fourth part of the article is the execution of the death penalty suspended life imprisonment system. As the main place of execution, the prison should correctly deal with the new challenges to the prison execution brought by the life imprisonment system. The author analyzes the problems of the death penalty suspended life imprisonment system in prison execution from three angles: the denial of the norms of life imprisonment system itself, the conflict of execution concept and the possible problems in the execution of death penalty. The fifth part of the article mainly according to the death penalty life imprisonment system defects and problems, combined with the fourth part of the analysis on the basis of the death penalty life imprisonment system in the legislative level, judicial level and penalty level to improve the recommendations.
【学位授予单位】：西南科技大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2017
【分类号】：D924.1

【相似文献】