行贿罪定罪量刑问题研究
[Abstract]:In our country, bribery crime has always been more tolerant than bribery crime, and the management effect of bribery crime is not satisfactory. Since the 18th National Congress of the Party, the determination of the Party Central Committee to crack down on corruption has been evident. It is as firm as a rock, and its anti-corruption efforts are unprecedented. It is necessary to severely punish the crime of bribery, especially by punishing the crime of bribery at its source. After the founding of New China, the evolution of legislation reflects that the present criminal policy of bribery crime in our country is too broad and slow to be changed into lenient and strict punishment. The Criminal Law Amendment (9) of the people's Republic of China was conceived under the background of anti-corruption. In this amendment, the anti-corruption system has been further improved to increase the punishment of bribery and a series of prominent corruption crimes. Although the Amendment of Criminal Law (9) has modified the crime of bribery to a certain extent, in judicial practice, there are still some problems in the conviction and sentencing of bribery. Based on this, the author puts forward his own views, in order to do a little bit of judicial practice in our country. With regard to the conviction of bribery, the author points out that seeking improper interests is the purpose of bribery crime, and it is also an indispensable subjective constituent element. In addition, we should correctly understand improper interests from relevant theories and legislative intent; the identification of objective behavior of bribery crime is mainly introduced from the identification of property and behavior mode; the crime of bribery and non-crime, The boundary between bribery and human relations, the division between bribery crime and unit bribery crime, and the reasonable definition between bribery crime and non-state staff bribery crime. For the sentencing of bribery crime, the determination standard of the statutory punishment range of bribery crime, including the general bribery crime, serious circumstances or cause the national interests to suffer heavy losses, especially serious circumstances of the three legal sentencing circumstances understanding and determination; The understanding of the restrictive provisions on the application of probation and exemption from criminal punishment in bribery crime and the other provisions which do not apply suspended sentence and exemption from criminal punishment, and the understanding and application of special voluntary surrender and meritorious service in strict lenient punishment of bribery crime.
【学位授予单位】:河北大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2017
【分类号】:D924.392
【相似文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 张荣川;几类行贿罪特殊主体的认定[J];人民检察;2001年02期
2 ;什么是行贿罪[J];农村实用技术与信息;2001年01期
3 林既立 ,林应懋;是代购物品还是行贿罪[J];法学;1985年07期
4 戴长林,,宁诗敏;关于行贿罪若干问题探讨[J];现代法学;1994年06期
5 施德文;王某的行为是否构成行贿罪[J];律师世界;1997年06期
6 张容;王某的行为不构成行贿罪[J];律师世界;1997年09期
7 郭光华;何为对公司、企业人员行贿罪[J];人民公安;1998年01期
8 吴绳昌;新刑法对行贿罪的规定有哪些修改?[J];警察天地;1997年09期
9 冯菁;行贿罪若干问题的探讨[J];社会科学;2000年11期
10 白云;论行贿罪与受贿罪的非对向关系[J];广东商学院学报;2000年04期
相关会议论文 前1条
1 周荣义;洪发胜;;中国跨国公司海外行贿罪的现实思考——以《刑法修正案(八)》第29条的实施为背景[A];赣台法学论坛文集——江西省犯罪学研究会年会(2011年)[C];2011年
相关重要报纸文章 前10条
1 裘立华;行贿多、行贿罪少的现象得改改了[N];济南日报;2014年
2 陆郴;对行贿罪追究不力的原因及对策[N];人民法院报;2000年
3 王俊杰;建议立法机关修改行贿罪标准[N];民主与法制时报;2006年
4 范媛丽;关于“李某某的行为是否构成行贿罪”案件解析[N];中国黄金报;2009年
5 河南省人民检察院 李涛;行贿罪立法应适度从严突出重点[N];检察日报;2011年
6 常州市武进区检察院 施卓超;谋取正当利益是否构成行贿罪[N];江苏法制报;2011年
7 记者 郑赫南;增设“对有影响力者行贿罪”[N];检察日报;2013年
8 黄强;行贿罪中行贿人“被追诉前”时间的界定[N];江苏法制报;2013年
9 韦遥远 灵川县人民法院;浅析行贿罪责任追究瑕疵[N];广西法治日报;2014年
10 刘生荣 胡云腾;行贿罪的法律分析[N];检察日报;2001年
相关硕士学位论文 前10条
1 吴鹏峰;行贿罪刑法规制问题及完善[D];内蒙古大学;2010年
2 刘小维;行贿罪若干问题研究[D];西安理工大学;2009年
3 于化萍;行贿罪若干问题探析[D];吉林大学;2010年
4 丁瑞;行贿罪若干问题研究[D];郑州大学;2007年
5 江剑飞;行贿罪若干问题研究[D];河北大学;2015年
6 李红超;行贿罪若干司法疑难问题研究[D];郑州大学;2015年
7 徐丹萍;论行贿行为的刑法规制[D];苏州大学;2015年
8 胡强;论我国行贿罪的立法完善[D];南昌大学;2015年
9 胡忠清;行贿罪中“不正当利益”的探究[D];华东政法大学;2015年
10 陈晶;利用影响力受贿罪对向行为刑法规制研究[D];江西财经大学;2015年
本文编号:2219282
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/xingfalunwen/2219282.html