渎职罪主体规定的困境及出路探究
发布时间:2018-09-05 20:34
【摘要】:2012年12月7日,我国最高人民检查院与最高人民检查院颁布相关的法律、法规,站在司法层面的角度上,对渎职罪的主体范围进行一定的界定,在一定程度上,从而有效地解决在司法之中对渎职罪主体进行认定问题。然而,对于渎职罪主体认定的问题方面,人大立法在司法解释层面依然存在一定的冲突,因此,应对其进行深入的研究,及时地解决上述存在的问题。本文主要研究我国的渎职罪主体的定义及范围,对存在的不足之处进行积极地探讨,并提出相应的解决措施,旨在为司法的实践活动提供重要的借鉴。
[Abstract]:On December 7, 2012, the Supreme people's Procuratorate and the Supreme people's Procuratorate promulgated relevant laws and regulations to define the scope of the subject of the crime of dereliction of duty, to a certain extent, from the angle of the judicial level. In order to effectively solve the problem of the subject of malfeasance in the judiciary. However, there is still a certain conflict in the judicial interpretation of the main body of malfeasance. Therefore, it is necessary to conduct a thorough study to solve the above problems in a timely manner. This paper mainly studies the definition and scope of the subject of dereliction of duty in our country, probes into the existing deficiencies actively, and puts forward corresponding measures to solve the problems, in order to provide important reference for the judicial practice.
【作者单位】: 大连财经学院法学院;
【分类号】:D924.3
本文编号:2225391
[Abstract]:On December 7, 2012, the Supreme people's Procuratorate and the Supreme people's Procuratorate promulgated relevant laws and regulations to define the scope of the subject of the crime of dereliction of duty, to a certain extent, from the angle of the judicial level. In order to effectively solve the problem of the subject of malfeasance in the judiciary. However, there is still a certain conflict in the judicial interpretation of the main body of malfeasance. Therefore, it is necessary to conduct a thorough study to solve the above problems in a timely manner. This paper mainly studies the definition and scope of the subject of dereliction of duty in our country, probes into the existing deficiencies actively, and puts forward corresponding measures to solve the problems, in order to provide important reference for the judicial practice.
【作者单位】: 大连财经学院法学院;
【分类号】:D924.3
【相似文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 岳飚;关于贪污案件中赃款数额认定问题的浅见[J];检察实践;2003年05期
2 张洪成;;毒品数量认定问题研究[J];云南大学学报(法学版);2011年01期
3 李福仁 ,南重俊;浅谈贪污案件中“赃款去向”的认定问题[J];政府法制;2000年12期
4 朱益平;;渎职罪损害后果认定问题研究[J];法制博览(中旬刊);2013年12期
5 龙开祥;;不作为渎职犯罪的认定问题[J];牡丹江大学学报;2008年08期
6 陈俊洁;;带领侦查机关抓获同案犯的立功认定问题探讨[J];工会论坛(山东省工会管理干部学院学报);2011年05期
7 罗森;;试论盗窃案件中的数额认定问题[J];法制与社会;2007年01期
8 项谷;张菁;;共同犯罪中主从犯的认定问题[J];犯罪研究;2009年02期
9 布鹏;赵捷;;渎职犯罪共犯形态的认定问题[J];南华大学学报(社会科学版);2012年04期
10 ;国家林业局关于盗伐、滥伐林木案件中有关违法事实认定问题的复函[J];国家林业局公报;2007年01期
相关重要报纸文章 前2条
1 孙颖东;事先共谋的共同犯罪的认定问题[N];江苏法制报;2014年
2 庆华;“因自身或者与其受贿有关联的人、事被查处”的认定问题[N];中国纪检监察报;2010年
,本文编号:2225391
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/xingfalunwen/2225391.html