新型知识产权侵权行为的刑法规制
发布时间：2018-09-08 07:50
【摘要】：知识产权的公力救济方式有民事救济、行政救济和刑事救济三种，这三种方式互相协调共同维护我国知识产权制度的良性运行，从而保障经济社会的有序健康发展。经过几十年的发展完善，在国内外因素的共同作用下，我国日益形成了一张较为严密的防范知识产权违法犯罪行为的法律网络。随着科学技术的进步和生活方式的变化，新型的知识产权侵权行为层出不穷，面对猖獗的侵犯知识产权的行为，显然止步于民事和行政保护是远远不够的，运用刑法保障手段对于规范社会成员的行为至关重要。本文主要围绕一些新型的侵权行为是否已经纳入刑法规制以及是否应当援用刑法予以规范这两个问题进行论述。 本文共由四个部分组成，在总体结构上为总分结构。第一章为总论部分，主要厘清了与知识产权和刑法保护相关的基本概念和理论；第二章至第四章为分论部分，分别论述了著作权、商标权和专利权领域的新现象。 具体而言，本文第一章主要总结论述了知识产权刑法保护的基本概念、基础理论以及我国知识产权刑法保护发展趋势。其中在基本概念部分对知识产权的定义和特征、知识产权犯罪的定义和特征、刑法保护的定义和特征做了详尽论述；在基础理论部分，主要论述了刑法保护的必要性和刑法保护知识产权应当恪守的基本原则；最后在探究我国知识产权刑法保护发展趋势一节，总结了发展历程并展望了未来发展方向。 第二章论述了著作权领域的新型侵权行为即网络传播行为的刑法规制。第一节客观梳理了刑法对著作权的保护范围；第二节花费较重笔墨探讨网络传播行为的刑法应罚性，并对当前刑法规制这一行为的得失做了评判，，最后对刑法应当如何规制网络环境下侵犯著作权的犯罪提出对策。 第三章分节论述了商标权领域服务商标侵权行为、驰名商标淡化行为和反向假冒行为的刑法可罚性。在论述中，主要遵循了以下思考逻辑：首先探讨该行为是否已经纳入刑法规制，是否应当纳入刑法体系；其次分析其应当或不应当纳入刑法体系的原因；最后对该行为的规制方式提出建议。 由于专利权的刑法规制方式较其他知识产权而言有一定特殊性，即刑法仅对假冒专利标识的行为进行评价，而未对其他任何专利侵权行为做出评价。因此，第四章主要论述了增设专利侵权罪的必要性。
[Abstract]:There are three ways of public remedy of intellectual property right: civil remedy, administrative remedy and criminal remedy. These three ways coordinate with each other to safeguard the healthy operation of intellectual property system in our country, so as to ensure the orderly and healthy development of economy and society. After decades of development and perfection, under the joint action of domestic and foreign factors, our country has increasingly formed a more strict legal network to guard against intellectual property illegal and criminal acts. With the progress of science and technology and the change of life style, the new type of intellectual property infringement appears in endlessly. In the face of rampant infringement of intellectual property, it is obviously not enough to stop at civil and administrative protection. It is very important to regulate the behavior of social members by means of criminal law guarantee. This paper mainly discusses whether some new types of torts have been brought into the criminal law and whether the criminal law should be invoked to regulate them. This paper is composed of four parts, the overall structure is the total structure. The first chapter is the general part, which mainly clarifies the basic concepts and theories related to intellectual property rights and criminal law protection, and the second to fourth chapters are divided into two parts, which respectively discuss the new phenomena in the field of copyright, trademark rights and patent rights. Specifically, the first chapter summarizes the basic concept of criminal protection of intellectual property rights, the basic theory and the development trend of criminal law protection of intellectual property rights in China. In the basic concept part, the definition and characteristics of intellectual property rights, the definition and characteristics of intellectual property crimes, the definition and characteristics of criminal law protection are discussed in detail. This paper mainly discusses the necessity of criminal law protection and the basic principles that criminal law should abide by in the protection of intellectual property rights, and finally, in the section of exploring the development trend of criminal law protection of intellectual property rights in China, summarizes the course of development and looks forward to the future development direction. The second chapter discusses the new tort in the field of copyright, that is, the criminal law regulation of network communication. The first section objectively combs the scope of the criminal law to the protection of copyright, the second section expends more effort to discuss the punishment of the network communication behavior, and evaluates the gains and losses of the current criminal law to regulate this act. Finally, the author puts forward some countermeasures on how to regulate the crime of infringing copyright under the network environment in criminal law. The third chapter discusses the criminal law penalty of service trademark infringement, well-known trademark dilution and reverse impersonation in the field of trademark rights. In the discussion, it mainly follows the following thinking logic: first, it discusses whether the act has been included in the criminal law regulation, whether it should be included in the criminal law system; secondly, it analyzes the reasons why it should or should not be included in the criminal law system; Finally, some suggestions on the regulation of this behavior are put forward. Compared with other intellectual property rights, the criminal law of patent right has some particularity, that is, criminal law only evaluates the act of impersonation of patent mark, but not any other patent infringement. Therefore, the fourth chapter mainly discusses the necessity of adding patent infringement crime.
【学位授予单位】：华东政法大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2014
【分类号】：D924.3
本文编号：2229864
[Abstract]:There are three ways of public remedy of intellectual property right: civil remedy, administrative remedy and criminal remedy. These three ways coordinate with each other to safeguard the healthy operation of intellectual property system in our country, so as to ensure the orderly and healthy development of economy and society. After decades of development and perfection, under the joint action of domestic and foreign factors, our country has increasingly formed a more strict legal network to guard against intellectual property illegal and criminal acts. With the progress of science and technology and the change of life style, the new type of intellectual property infringement appears in endlessly. In the face of rampant infringement of intellectual property, it is obviously not enough to stop at civil and administrative protection. It is very important to regulate the behavior of social members by means of criminal law guarantee. This paper mainly discusses whether some new types of torts have been brought into the criminal law and whether the criminal law should be invoked to regulate them. This paper is composed of four parts, the overall structure is the total structure. The first chapter is the general part, which mainly clarifies the basic concepts and theories related to intellectual property rights and criminal law protection, and the second to fourth chapters are divided into two parts, which respectively discuss the new phenomena in the field of copyright, trademark rights and patent rights. Specifically, the first chapter summarizes the basic concept of criminal protection of intellectual property rights, the basic theory and the development trend of criminal law protection of intellectual property rights in China. In the basic concept part, the definition and characteristics of intellectual property rights, the definition and characteristics of intellectual property crimes, the definition and characteristics of criminal law protection are discussed in detail. This paper mainly discusses the necessity of criminal law protection and the basic principles that criminal law should abide by in the protection of intellectual property rights, and finally, in the section of exploring the development trend of criminal law protection of intellectual property rights in China, summarizes the course of development and looks forward to the future development direction. The second chapter discusses the new tort in the field of copyright, that is, the criminal law regulation of network communication. The first section objectively combs the scope of the criminal law to the protection of copyright, the second section expends more effort to discuss the punishment of the network communication behavior, and evaluates the gains and losses of the current criminal law to regulate this act. Finally, the author puts forward some countermeasures on how to regulate the crime of infringing copyright under the network environment in criminal law. The third chapter discusses the criminal law penalty of service trademark infringement, well-known trademark dilution and reverse impersonation in the field of trademark rights. In the discussion, it mainly follows the following thinking logic: first, it discusses whether the act has been included in the criminal law regulation, whether it should be included in the criminal law system; secondly, it analyzes the reasons why it should or should not be included in the criminal law system; Finally, some suggestions on the regulation of this behavior are put forward. Compared with other intellectual property rights, the criminal law of patent right has some particularity, that is, criminal law only evaluates the act of impersonation of patent mark, but not any other patent infringement. Therefore, the fourth chapter mainly discusses the necessity of adding patent infringement crime.
【学位授予单位】：华东政法大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2014
【分类号】：D924.3
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前8条
1 解琳;;反向假冒的刑法归罪及立法建议[J];中华商标;2009年04期
2 吴汉东;关于知识产权基本制度的经济学思考[J];法学;2000年04期
3 王迁;;论“网络传播行为”的界定及其侵权认定[J];法学;2006年05期
4 潘舫;;浅析我国侵犯商标权刑法保护范围之不足及完善[J];法制与经济(中旬刊);2009年07期
5 高铭暄;张杰;;国际法视角下商标犯罪刑法适用若干疑难问题探析[J];江苏警官学院学报;2008年03期
6 朱军平;;论我国驰名商标的反淡化保护与完善[J];消费导刊;2008年02期
7 陈婵婷;;服务商标应成为商标犯罪的对象[J];人民检察;2007年11期
8 王文波;经济全球化与知识产权犯罪[J];山东公安专科学校学报;2002年05期
本文编号：2229864
本文链接：https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/xingfalunwen/2229864.html
