论因果流程偏离的主观归责
发布时间：2018-09-08 10:53
【摘要】：因果流程偏离包括狭义的因果流程偏离、结果的延后发生、结果的提前发生以及打击错误。错误论认为因果流程偏离的难点在于故意的认定,因果关系论认为因果流程偏离的关键在于客观归责的判断。但是,这两种立场都有"倒果为因"的嫌疑——根据结论的需要来进行故意或客观归责的判断,因此难以避免判断的恣意性。因果流程偏离的适用应采取主观归责论,即在肯定了故意与客观归责的基础上再从规范上判断结果能否归责于故意。主观归责的标准不是计划理论,也不是故意危险理论,而是构成要件理论。
[Abstract]:Causality process deviation includes narrow causality process deviation, delay of result, early occurrence of result and strike error. The error theory holds that the difficulty of causality flow deviation lies in the intentional identification, and the causality theory believes that the key of causality flow deviation lies in the judgment of objective imputation. However, these two positions have the suspicion of "turning the fruit down as the cause"-the judgment of intentional or objective imputation is carried out according to the need of conclusion, so it is difficult to avoid the arbitrariness of judgment. The application of causality flow deviation should adopt subjective imputation theory, that is, on the basis of affirming intentional and objective imputation, we can judge whether the result can be attributed to intention from the standard. The criterion of subjective imputation is not the theory of plan, nor the theory of intentional danger, but the theory of constitutive elements.
【作者单位】： 东南大学法学院;
【基金】：教育部“新世纪优秀人才支持计划”(NCET-13-0125)资助
【分类号】：D914
，
本文编号：2230308
[Abstract]:Causality process deviation includes narrow causality process deviation, delay of result, early occurrence of result and strike error. The error theory holds that the difficulty of causality flow deviation lies in the intentional identification, and the causality theory believes that the key of causality flow deviation lies in the judgment of objective imputation. However, these two positions have the suspicion of "turning the fruit down as the cause"-the judgment of intentional or objective imputation is carried out according to the need of conclusion, so it is difficult to avoid the arbitrariness of judgment. The application of causality flow deviation should adopt subjective imputation theory, that is, on the basis of affirming intentional and objective imputation, we can judge whether the result can be attributed to intention from the standard. The criterion of subjective imputation is not the theory of plan, nor the theory of intentional danger, but the theory of constitutive elements.
【作者单位】： 东南大学法学院;
【基金】：教育部“新世纪优秀人才支持计划”(NCET-13-0125)资助
【分类号】：D914
，
本文编号：2230308
本文链接：https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/xingfalunwen/2230308.html
