运输毒品罪的司法认定问题研究

发布时间：2018-09-15 18:59

【摘要】：运输毒品罪作为我国毒品犯罪中的罪名之一，通常与走私、贩卖、制造毒品等行为伴随发生，我国刑法并未对运输毒品罪的犯罪形态、犯罪特征做具体规定，这给司法实践工作带来不少困难，然而作为高发性的毒品犯罪行为，笔者认为应对运输毒品罪的司法认定问题作出具体研究以提高司法机关的办案效率且减少此类案件判决罪刑不相应情况的发生。本文采用实证分析法、文献研究法、比较分析法、功能分析法，从三个案例出发引出争议问题，并结合国内外关于研究运输毒品罪相关文献，分析比较其中的不同观点，在此基础上，提出自己的看法。本文分三个部分进行阐述，包括运输毒品罪的客观方面的认定、运输毒品罪的主观方面的认定以及运输毒品罪的既遂与未遂的认定。首先在客观方面，提出两个司法实践中常见的难题，即毒品运输距离与认定运输毒品罪的关系以及运输掺杂掺假毒品的数量认定。通过论述得出毒品运输距离较短不影响运输毒品罪的成立，运输毒品行为的关键在于使毒品发生流通，危害了国家对毒品的管制秩序，开始产生一定的社会危害性。认定毒品数量不进行纯度折算但应当进行纯度鉴定，要将毒品纯度作为重要的量刑情节。其次，在运输毒品罪的主观方面的认定问题上，笔者的观点是间接故意能够构成运输毒品罪，且提出认定行为人对其运输毒品具有间接故意的具体方法，这也为司法实践中判断行为人对运输毒品是否具有明知的故意提供了一种认定思路。最后，，笔者论述了运输毒品罪的既遂和未遂的认定，提出应当以“起运既遂说”作为运输毒品罪的既未遂状态的认定标准，即行为人只要将毒品起运，这种行为状态就已经属于运输毒品罪的既遂状态，并分析了不同运输毒品行为的既未遂状态的认定。
[Abstract]:The crime of transporting drugs, as one of the crimes in drug crimes in China, is usually accompanied by such acts as smuggling, trafficking and manufacture of drugs. The criminal law of our country does not specify the form and characteristics of the crime of transporting drugs. This brings a lot of difficulties to the judicial practice. However, as a high-incidence drug crime, The author thinks that the problem of judicial cognizance of the crime of transporting drugs should be studied in order to improve the efficiency of handling cases of the judicial organs and to reduce the occurrence of mismatch in the judgment of this kind of cases. This paper uses empirical analysis method, literature research method, comparative analysis method, functional analysis method, starting from three cases to lead to the controversial issues, and combined with the domestic and foreign research on the crime of drug transport literature, analysis and comparison of the different views. On this basis, put forward their own views. This article is divided into three parts, including the identification of the objective aspects of the crime of transporting drugs, the subjective aspect of the crime of transporting drugs and the confirmation of the accomplishment and attempt of the crime of transporting drugs. Firstly, two common problems in judicial practice are put forward, that is, the relationship between the distance of drug transportation and the crime of drug transportation and the quantity determination of adulterated drugs. The conclusion is that the short distance of drug transportation does not affect the establishment of the crime of transporting drugs. The key of drug transport behavior lies in the circulation of drugs, which endangers the order of national drug control and begins to produce certain social harmfulness. The quantity of drugs should not be converted, but the purity should be identified, and the purity of drugs should be taken as an important sentencing circumstance. Secondly, in the subjective aspect of the crime of transporting drugs, the author holds that the indirect intention can constitute the crime of transporting drugs, and puts forward the specific method of determining the perpetrator's indirect intention to transport drugs. This also provides a way to judge whether the doer knowingly and intentionally carries drugs in judicial practice. Finally, the author discusses the determination of the accomplished and attempted crime of transporting drugs, and puts forward that the crime of transporting drugs should be regarded as the standard of identification of the attempted state of the crime of transporting drugs, that is, the perpetrator should only start the transportation of drugs. This kind of behavior state already belongs to the accomplished state of the crime of transporting drugs, and analyzes the identification of the attempted state of different drug transport behaviors.
【学位授予单位】：沈阳师范大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2014
【分类号】：D924.36

【参考文献】