虚假诉讼罪司法适用研究
[Abstract]:The crime of false litigation protects the judicial order and the legitimate rights and interests of others, and the judicial order is the main legal interest. The degree of "serious" in "seriously infringing upon the legitimate rights and interests of others" should be determined according to the circumstances, and the cases of invading property can be quantified. "Civil procedure" should be understood broadly, including the procedure of first instance, the procedure of second instance and the procedure of summary, special procedure and execution. The types of the crime of false litigation include collusion and unilateral fraud; concealment of the truth in the manner of conduct, falsification of evidence to determine whether or not it can be an objective element of the crime; the defendant and the third person, Under certain circumstances, the criminal subject of the crime can be made up, and the practice of the crime of false litigation is "fabricated" and "initiated", in which "filing" is not limited to taking the initiative to initiate a lawsuit; The standard of identification in the form of cessation of crime should be classified into general and special circumstances, generally, the standard of determination should be "accepting by the court of civil action", "submitting evidence" in special circumstances; The judgment standard of accomplishment should not be based on the judgment of the court, but on the fact that the actor submitted evidence or claim to the court, that is to say, to cause the infringement of legal interests. False litigation crime and fraud crime and other charges of imaginative coincidence, choose a felony penalty.
【学位授予单位】:南京师范大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2017
【分类号】:D924.3
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 何秉群;;论虚假诉讼检察监督的现状、难点与对策--以河北省检察机关虚假诉讼监督开展情况为例[J];河北法学;2017年04期
2 肖怡;;《刑法修正案(九)》虚假诉讼罪探析[J];法学杂志;2016年10期
3 张艳;;虚假诉讼类型化研究与现行法规定之检讨——以法院裁判的案件为中心[J];政治与法律;2016年07期
4 孙荣杰;储昱;;虚假诉讼罪的罪状、形态与罪数问题[J];人民检察;2016年11期
5 王志祥;刘婷;;虚假诉讼罪:概念界定与学理分析[J];南阳师范学院学报;2016年01期
6 郭莉;;虚假诉讼犯罪的理解与适用[J];中国检察官;2016年01期
7 吴芳;;虚假诉讼罪的司法认定[J];人民检察;2015年24期
8 胡安琪;;虚假诉讼刑法规制及其完善——以《刑法修正案(九)草案》为视角[J];山西农业大学学报(社会科学版);2015年07期
9 王德政;;论法益判断法——一罪是行为犯或结果犯的判断标准[J];重庆文理学院学报(社会科学版);2015年04期
10 许尚豪;欧元捷;;有诉必案——立案模式及立案登记制构建研究[J];山东社会科学;2015年07期
相关重要报纸文章 前5条
1 时婷婷;卢志坚;;江苏检察机关2016年办理322件虚假诉讼监督案件[N];民主与法制时报;2017年
2 梁根林;;虚假诉讼入罪要斟酌三个问题[N];检察日报;2015年
3 徐春建;古锡麟;林广海 ;王建平;杜以星;王晶 ;李民韬;;依法打击虚假民事诉讼 切实维护司法权威[N];人民法院报;2010年
4 ;恶意诉讼侵财更符合敲诈勒索罪特征[N];检察日报;2003年
5 潘晓甫;王克先;;伪造民事证据是否构成犯罪[N];检察日报;2002年
,本文编号:2244611
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/xingfalunwen/2244611.html