境外追逃中的量刑承诺制度研究
发布时间：2018-10-05 14:44
【摘要】：引渡请求国针对被请求国的要求作出量刑承诺,并保证承诺的顺利实现,是保障境外追逃顺利进行的关键性措施。反思我国量刑承诺制度,还存在以下问题:在上下级法院是监督与被监督关系的前提下,当前保障案件审理法院遵守最高人民法院作出的量刑承诺的机制并非无懈可击;在案件判决书没有明确提及最高人民法院已经作出的量刑承诺的前提下,难以保障判决书既实现量刑的充分说理,又实现量刑承诺的具体内容,并体现量刑承诺对于最终判决的直接约束力。对此可以考虑通过以下方式完善:建立法定的量刑承诺程序,将最高人民法院量刑承诺的决定权赋予一审法院,并逐级上报至最高人民法院核准,为量刑承诺的兑现奠定制度基础;在判决书中明确引用之前作出的量刑承诺,从而既实现量刑的充分说理,又体现量刑承诺对于判决的直接约束力,提升国际社会对于我国量刑承诺制度的认可与信心,从而推动境外追逃的良性循环。
[Abstract]:It is the key measure to guarantee the successful implementation of the request of the requested country to make the sentence commitment to the request of the requested country and to guarantee the smooth implementation of the promise. Reflecting on the system of sentencing commitment in our country, there are still some problems: under the premise of the relationship between the superior and lower courts being supervised and supervised, the current mechanism to ensure the courts to abide by the sentencing commitments made by the Supreme people's Court is not impeccable; Without explicitly mentioning the sentencing commitments already made by the Supreme people's Court, it is difficult to ensure that the judgment not only fully justifies sentencing, but also realizes the specific content of sentencing commitments. And reflects the sentencing commitment to the final decision of the direct binding force. In view of this, we may consider perfecting it by establishing a statutory sentencing commitment procedure, entrusting the decision of the Supreme people's Court to the court of first instance, and reporting it to the Supreme people's Court for approval. It lays a system foundation for the fulfillment of sentencing commitment, and explicitly quotes the previous sentencing commitment in the judgment, thus realizing the full justification of sentencing and reflecting the direct binding force of sentencing commitment on the judgment. To promote international recognition and confidence in China's sentencing commitment system, thus promoting the virtuous circle of overseas pursuit.
【作者单位】： 北京师范大学刑事法律科学研究院;北京师范大学G20反腐败追逃追赃研究中心;
【基金】：2014年国家社科基金项目“法治反腐背景下境外追逃问题研究”(项目批准号:14BFX001)的阶段性成果
【分类号】：D924.1
本文编号：2253786
[Abstract]:It is the key measure to guarantee the successful implementation of the request of the requested country to make the sentence commitment to the request of the requested country and to guarantee the smooth implementation of the promise. Reflecting on the system of sentencing commitment in our country, there are still some problems: under the premise of the relationship between the superior and lower courts being supervised and supervised, the current mechanism to ensure the courts to abide by the sentencing commitments made by the Supreme people's Court is not impeccable; Without explicitly mentioning the sentencing commitments already made by the Supreme people's Court, it is difficult to ensure that the judgment not only fully justifies sentencing, but also realizes the specific content of sentencing commitments. And reflects the sentencing commitment to the final decision of the direct binding force. In view of this, we may consider perfecting it by establishing a statutory sentencing commitment procedure, entrusting the decision of the Supreme people's Court to the court of first instance, and reporting it to the Supreme people's Court for approval. It lays a system foundation for the fulfillment of sentencing commitment, and explicitly quotes the previous sentencing commitment in the judgment, thus realizing the full justification of sentencing and reflecting the direct binding force of sentencing commitment on the judgment. To promote international recognition and confidence in China's sentencing commitment system, thus promoting the virtuous circle of overseas pursuit.
【作者单位】： 北京师范大学刑事法律科学研究院;北京师范大学G20反腐败追逃追赃研究中心;
【基金】：2014年国家社科基金项目“法治反腐背景下境外追逃问题研究”(项目批准号:14BFX001)的阶段性成果
【分类号】：D924.1
【相似文献】
相关期刊论文 前1条
1 王强军;;利用遣返实现境外追逃问题研究[J];法学评论;2013年06期
，本文编号：2253786
本文链接：https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/xingfalunwen/2253786.html
