结果无价值论与二元论之争的共识、误区与发展方向

发布时间：2018-10-14 13:15

【摘要】：结果无价值论与二元论之争对于推动中国刑法学走向深入化、系统化和个性化起到了巨大推动作用。经过相互论争和彼此影响,两派的对立色彩较之于论战之初已大为减弱。双方在诸如坚持法益保护的刑法目的观、贯彻罪刑法定原则等基本立场方面,已经形成了广泛共识。论争过程中出现的一些理论误区,例如不同功利主义流派、行为规范和裁判规范与不法论的对应关系、构成要件与犯罪类型的关系,以及主观违法要素与正当防卫等,亟待澄清。未来,结果无价值论与二元论之争,似乎应从宏观的理念和立场层面,回归到更为技术性、操作性的实际问题之上,特别是应当聚焦于古典犯罪论体系与综合型犯罪论体系的比较分析。
[Abstract]:Results the dispute between non-value theory and dualism has played a great role in promoting the deepening, systematization and individualization of Chinese criminal law. As a result of mutual controversy and influence, the antagonism between the two schools has been greatly weakened compared with the beginning of the controversy. The two sides have reached a broad consensus on such basic positions as adhering to the criminal law purpose view of legal interest protection and carrying out the principle of legally prescribed punishment. Some theoretical misunderstandings appear in the process of controversy, such as different schools of utilitarianism, the corresponding relationship between norms of conduct and adjudication and illegality, the relationship between constitutive elements and types of crimes, and the subjective elements of illegal law and legitimate defense, etc. There is an urgent need for clarification. In the future, it seems that the controversy between the theory of value and dualism of the result should return to the more technical and operational practical problems from the macroscopic view and stand level. Especially, we should focus on the comparative analysis of classical crime theory system and comprehensive crime theory system.
【作者单位】：中国人民大学刑事法律科学研究中心;
【基金】：国家社科基金青年项目“刑法中紧急权的体系与解释研究”(批准号:15CFX036)的阶段性成果
【分类号】：D914

【相似文献】