拒不履行食品召回义务行为的刑法规制研究
发布时间：2018-10-14 12:45
【摘要】：近年来,食品安全事故频发,我国面临的食品安全问题形势严峻。就食品安全保护而言,刑法是最终的屏障,因此对于这部分问题的规制力度必须要加大,进而起到保护食品安全的作用。我国目前已经颁布了《食品安全法》等相应的法律,而且《刑法修正案(八)》也针对食品安全犯罪做出的较大程度的调整和修改,为刑法调控拒不履行食品召回义务行为奠定了法制基础。该种行为纳入刑法规范具有必要性与可行性,必要性在于维护社会的和谐稳定与市场经济秩序以及完善刑事法制,可行性源于我国已经出台的相关法律法规与域外立法借鉴。刑法调控拒不履行食品召回义务行为的方式是增设“拒不召回不安全食品罪”,其直接目的是从根源上防范此类行为,理论依据是风险刑法理论、不作为犯罪理论和四要件的犯罪构成模式。本文共分四部分内容:第一部分,拒不履行食品召回义务行为刑法规制的现实依据。具体是对食品召回这一制度的起源及其发展状况进行介绍,并且简单介绍了国内这一制度的发展以及当前的现状,并从经济、政治和法律层面分析对不履行食品召回义务行为进行刑法规制的必要性,从现有法律法规分析对不履行这一义务进行刑法规制的可行性。第二部分,拒不履行食品召回义务行为刑法规制的理论基础。将风险刑法理论引入其中,探究在风险社会下,面对不履行食品召回义务行为时,刑法面临的问题和应对办法。通过分析不作为犯罪理论,阐明不履行食品召回义务行为需要入罪的依据。通过比较各国的犯罪构成模式,选择不履行食品召回义务行为入刑所采用的犯罪构成模式。第三部分,拒不履行食品召回义务行为刑法规制的域外考察。选取了加拿大、美国等国有关这一方面的制度作为参考,对其进行简单介绍和深入分析,对当前国际上这一制度的发展趋势有所了解,再结合我国的基本国情,对国外先进经验予以借鉴,同时说明在食品召回制度发展较快的国家,针对不履行食品召回义务行为进行刑法规制也是必要的。第四部分,拒不履行食品召回义务行为刑法规制的具体设计。通过罪名的设计使得对不履行食品召回义务行为刑法规制有一个初步的印象,通过对犯罪构成四要件的简单介绍,分析得出拒不召回不安全食品罪的犯罪构成四要件的具体内容,得出拒不召回不安全食品罪的具体刑罚设计。
[Abstract]:In recent years, food safety accidents occur frequently. As far as food safety protection is concerned, criminal law is the ultimate barrier, so the regulation of this part of the problem must be strengthened, and then play a role in the protection of food safety. At present, China has promulgated the "Food Safety Law" and other corresponding laws, and the "Criminal Law Amendment (8)" has also made relatively large adjustments and amendments to food safety crimes. It lays a legal foundation for the criminal law to control the refusal to fulfill the duty of food recall. It is necessary and feasible for this kind of behavior to be brought into the criminal law norm. The necessity lies in maintaining social harmony and stability, market economy order and perfecting criminal legal system. The feasibility comes from the relevant laws and regulations and foreign legislation that our country has issued. The way that the criminal law regulates the behavior of refusing to fulfill the recall obligation of food is to add the crime of refusing to recall unsafe food. Its direct purpose is to prevent this kind of behavior from the root, and the theoretical basis is the theory of risk criminal law. The theory of omission crime and the four elements of the crime constitute mode. This paper is divided into four parts: the first part, the practical basis of the criminal law regulation of refusing to fulfill the duty of food recall. Specifically, it introduces the origin and development of the food recall system, and briefly introduces the development and current situation of this system in China, and from the perspective of the economy, At the political and legal level, the necessity of the criminal law regulation on the failure to fulfill the obligation of food recall is analyzed, and the feasibility of the criminal law regulation on the failure to fulfill this obligation is analyzed from the existing laws and regulations. The second part, the theory foundation of the criminal law regulation of refusing to fulfill the duty of food recall. This paper introduces the theory of risk criminal law into it, and explores the problems and countermeasures of the criminal law when it does not fulfill the duty of food recall in the risk society. By analyzing the theory of omission, this paper expounds the basis of incrimination for failing to fulfill the duty of food recall. By comparing the crime constitution model of various countries, the author chooses the crime constitution mode of not fulfilling the duty of food recall. The third part, the extraterritorial investigation of the criminal law regulation of refusing to fulfill the duty of food recall. Taking Canada, the United States and other countries' systems in this area as reference, briefly introducing and analyzing them, understanding the current international development trend of this system, and combining with the basic conditions of our country, At the same time, it is necessary to regulate the behavior of food recall by criminal law in countries where the food recall system is developing rapidly. The fourth part, the specific design of the criminal law regulation of refusing to fulfill the duty of food recall. Through the design of the charge makes a preliminary impression on the criminal law regulation of the failure to fulfill the duty of food recall, and through the brief introduction of the four elements of the constitution of the crime, The four elements of the crime of refusing to recall unsafe food are analyzed, and the specific penalty design of the crime of refusing to recall unsafe food is obtained.
【学位授予单位】：东北师范大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2015
【分类号】：D924.3
本文编号：2270492
[Abstract]:In recent years, food safety accidents occur frequently. As far as food safety protection is concerned, criminal law is the ultimate barrier, so the regulation of this part of the problem must be strengthened, and then play a role in the protection of food safety. At present, China has promulgated the "Food Safety Law" and other corresponding laws, and the "Criminal Law Amendment (8)" has also made relatively large adjustments and amendments to food safety crimes. It lays a legal foundation for the criminal law to control the refusal to fulfill the duty of food recall. It is necessary and feasible for this kind of behavior to be brought into the criminal law norm. The necessity lies in maintaining social harmony and stability, market economy order and perfecting criminal legal system. The feasibility comes from the relevant laws and regulations and foreign legislation that our country has issued. The way that the criminal law regulates the behavior of refusing to fulfill the recall obligation of food is to add the crime of refusing to recall unsafe food. Its direct purpose is to prevent this kind of behavior from the root, and the theoretical basis is the theory of risk criminal law. The theory of omission crime and the four elements of the crime constitute mode. This paper is divided into four parts: the first part, the practical basis of the criminal law regulation of refusing to fulfill the duty of food recall. Specifically, it introduces the origin and development of the food recall system, and briefly introduces the development and current situation of this system in China, and from the perspective of the economy, At the political and legal level, the necessity of the criminal law regulation on the failure to fulfill the obligation of food recall is analyzed, and the feasibility of the criminal law regulation on the failure to fulfill this obligation is analyzed from the existing laws and regulations. The second part, the theory foundation of the criminal law regulation of refusing to fulfill the duty of food recall. This paper introduces the theory of risk criminal law into it, and explores the problems and countermeasures of the criminal law when it does not fulfill the duty of food recall in the risk society. By analyzing the theory of omission, this paper expounds the basis of incrimination for failing to fulfill the duty of food recall. By comparing the crime constitution model of various countries, the author chooses the crime constitution mode of not fulfilling the duty of food recall. The third part, the extraterritorial investigation of the criminal law regulation of refusing to fulfill the duty of food recall. Taking Canada, the United States and other countries' systems in this area as reference, briefly introducing and analyzing them, understanding the current international development trend of this system, and combining with the basic conditions of our country, At the same time, it is necessary to regulate the behavior of food recall by criminal law in countries where the food recall system is developing rapidly. The fourth part, the specific design of the criminal law regulation of refusing to fulfill the duty of food recall. Through the design of the charge makes a preliminary impression on the criminal law regulation of the failure to fulfill the duty of food recall, and through the brief introduction of the four elements of the constitution of the crime, The four elements of the crime of refusing to recall unsafe food are analyzed, and the specific penalty design of the crime of refusing to recall unsafe food is obtained.
【学位授予单位】：东北师范大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2015
【分类号】：D924.3
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 李学同;论不作为犯罪的特定义务[J];法学评论;1991年04期
2 毛乃纯;;论食品安全犯罪中的过失问题——以公害犯罪理论为根基[J];中国人民公安大学学报(社会科学版);2010年04期
3 潘庸鲁;;理性看待刑法——以刑法与犯罪的关系为视角[J];理论界;2008年10期
4 李梁;;风险社会视域下食品安全刑法保护的缺陷与完善——以《刑法修正案(八)》保“民生”为主线[J];河南警察学院学报;2013年04期
5 高铭暄;;对主张以三阶层犯罪成立体系取代我国通行犯罪构成理论者的回应[J];刑法论丛;2009年03期
6 马克昌;;危险社会与刑法谦抑原则[J];人民检察;2010年03期
7 王菁;刘文;;国外食品召回制度的现状与特点以及对我国的启示[J];食品科技;2007年12期
8 房清侠;;食品安全刑法保护的缺陷与完善[J];河南财经政法大学学报;2012年02期
9 刘伟;;风险社会语境下我国危害食品安全犯罪刑事立法的转型[J];中国刑事法杂志;2011年11期
10 刘晓莉;;降低入罪门槛的当代价值探究——以《刑法修正案(八)草案》对生产销售假药罪的修正为视角[J];政治与法律;2011年01期
，本文编号：2270492
本文链接：https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/xingfalunwen/2270492.html
