原因自由行为理论困境与出路

发布时间：2018-10-20 08:09

【摘要】：原因自由行为理论是大陆法系中的一个重要理论。虽然现代各国刑事法治均认为原因自由行为具有可罚性，，但在刑法理论体系中，原因自由行为却与“责任与行为同时存在”原则产生了看似不可调和的冲突。本文着重讨论故意自陷的原因自由行为的故意犯的可罚性根据问题。全文分析了中外学者尝试解决原因自由行为可罚性根据的四种学说的缺陷，并以新的行为概念做支撑，以“过程”为切入点，分析了故意自陷的原因自由行为的故意犯的行为性，同时利用新行为概念下着手的三个标准，界定出了故意自陷的原因自由行为的故意犯的着手时点，最终对故意自陷的原因自由行为的故意犯的可罚性根据做出自己的解释。全文除引言和结语外，共分三个部分，各部分主要内容如下：第一部分，原因自由行为理论的概述。这一部分介绍了原因自由行为概念的争议，并对原因自由行为的范围从责任能力状态和主观罪过进行界定，明确了文章研究的重点，即故意自陷的原因自由行为的故意犯的可罚性根据问题。第二部分，原因自由行为理论的困境。这一部分分别介绍了原因自由行为理论中四种代表性的学说，即意思决定说、原因行为支配可能性说、责任例外说、间接正犯说的观点和缺陷。第三部分，原因自由行为理论的出路。这一部分首先提出了新的行为概念和犯罪行为的概念，并在新的犯罪行为的概念下阐述了犯罪主体要件和主观要件，确定了新行为概念下着手的三个标准，这为解决故意自陷的原因自由行为的故意犯可罚性根据问题提供了理论支撑。其次，论述了新行为概念下原因自由行为的概念、行为性质、着手的时点，最终解决了其可罚性根据问题。最后，在我国犯罪论体系下论述了故意自陷的原因自由行为的故意犯的构成要件，明确了其可罚性。
[Abstract]:The theory of cause-free behavior is an important theory in the civil law system. Although the criminal law of modern countries all think that the free act of reason has the character of punishment, but in the theory system of criminal law, the principle of the free act of reason and the principle of "simultaneous existence of responsibility and behavior" produce seemingly irreconcilable conflict. In this paper, we mainly discuss the penalty basis of intentional crime of free act due to the reason of intentional self-trapping. This paper analyzes the defects of the four theories that Chinese and foreign scholars try to solve the penalty basis of the cause free behavior, and takes the new concept of behavior as the support and the "process" as the breakthrough point. In this paper, the author analyzes the behavior of intentional crime of the cause of intentional self-trapping, and at the same time defines the starting point of intentional crime of freedom of reason of intentional self-trapping by using the three standards under the new concept of behavior. Finally, the author makes his own explanation on the penalty of intentional crime of the free act of intentional self-trapping. In addition to the introduction and conclusion, the full text is divided into three parts. The main contents of each part are as follows: the first part is an overview of the theory of free cause behavior. This part introduces the controversy of the concept of cause-free behavior, defines the scope of cause-free behavior from the state of responsibility ability and subjective guilt, and clarifies the focus of this article. That is to say, the reason of intentional self-trapping is the penalty basis of intentional crime of free act. The second part is the dilemma of the theory of free action. This part introduces four representative theories in the theory of cause-free behavior, that is, the theory of decision of intention, the theory of possibility of reason behavior, the theory of liability exception, and the view and defect of indirect principal offender theory. The third part, the reason free behavior theory outlet. This part first puts forward the new concept of behavior and the concept of criminal behavior, and under the new concept of criminal behavior, expounds the elements of the subject and subjective elements of the crime, and determines the three standards under the new concept of behavior. This provides theoretical support for solving the problem of the penalty of intentional crime. Secondly, this paper discusses the concept, nature and time of action of the cause free act under the new concept of behavior, and finally solves the problem of the basis of its penalability. Finally, under the crime theory system of our country, it discusses the constitutive elements of intentional crime of the free act of intentional self-trapping, and clarifies its penalability.
【学位授予单位】：重庆大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2014
【分类号】：D914

【参考文献】