扒窃型盗窃司法认定的实证研究

发布时间：2018-10-24 22:55

【摘要】：扒窃型盗窃作为盗窃罪一种特殊的罪状被规定在《刑法修正案(八)》之中,盗窃罪的定罪模式随之发生了变化。这种新型盗窃的出现对理论界和司法实务都提出了新的课题,对盗窃罪的刑事司法产生了深远的影响,同时也为打击扒窃犯罪提供了刑法依据,彰显了对打击扒窃犯罪的决心。但是,对于扒窃入刑之后,扒窃的概念以及扒窃构成要件并没有一个明确的界定。司法实践中,由于对扒窃的不同理解,所占的立场、角度不同等原因,从而造成了不同的审判结果。可以发现,对于扒窃还没有达到一个统一的标准,从而造成了司法上和理论上的困境。本文主要是扒窃型盗窃司法认定的实证研究。首先,笔者整理出近五年扒窃案件的数量以及所占的比重,通过数据的整理,发映出扒窃案件的现状,并就理论界与司法实务中出现的关于扒窃型盗窃行为类型的认定、既遂未遂的问题、数额的认定等争议提出问题。其次,是本文采用的分析方法,即实证研究,并就研究目的、实证研究的可行性与必要性进行阐述,确立样本标准,即北京市175例司法案件,并对论文的分析框架进行一个简要的概括。再次,扒窃型盗窃定罪情节的司法认定。将“随身携带”的认定、“公共场所”的认定规律予以阐述,以此发现在司法实践中大致采取的观点,并就扒窃型盗窃与其他类型盗窃之间的关系进行梳理,并对定罪情节的认定规律在罪刑法定原则下予以评析,并提出自己的看法与建议。最后,扒窃型盗窃量刑情节的司法认定。将扒窃案件中涉及到的相关量刑情节予以统计并汇总,再就量刑情节与量刑间的关系进行比对,发现扒窃型盗窃在司法适用中量刑情节对量刑的影响,并对量刑情节认定规律在罪责相适应原则下予以评析,并提出自己的看法与建议。本文主要以司法认定为主线,通过对相关问题的梳理,以期能够解决司法认定上争议的问题。对于扒窃入刑后产生的诸多问题,再去争论其入罪是否合理已无意义,对扒窃行为如何限定,对扒窃行为如何理解,给予扒窃行为一个明晰的概念,才是应当关注的首要问题,这样也能为司法实务提供准确的、可行性的标准。当扒窃概念明晰,扒窃的构成要件确定,对于扒窃的犯罪形态等问题自然也就水到渠成。通过上述的简要概括,志在为扒窃在司法适用中提供参考,使扒窃的认定更为准确。
[Abstract]:As a special crime of larceny, pickpocketing theft is stipulated in the Criminal Law Amendment (8), and the conviction mode of theft has changed. The emergence of this new type of theft has put forward a new subject to the theoretical circle and judicial practice, which has a profound influence on the criminal justice of theft, and also provides the criminal law basis for cracking down on the crime of pickpocketing and demonstrates the determination to crack down on the crime of pickpocketing. However, there is no clear definition of the concept of pickpocketing and its constituent elements. In judicial practice, due to the different understanding of pickpocketing, the position of different reasons, resulting in different trial results. It can be found that pickpocketing has not yet reached a unified standard, resulting in judicial and theoretical difficulties. This paper is mainly an empirical study on judicial cognizance of pickpocketing theft. First of all, the author sorted out the number and proportion of pickpocketing cases in the past five years. Through the data collation, the author mapped out the current situation of pickpocketing cases, and identified the types of pickpocket theft behavior that appeared in the theoretical circle and judicial practice. The issue of attempted accomplishment and the determination of the amount raised questions. Secondly, it is the analysis method used in this paper, that is, the empirical study. The purpose, feasibility and necessity of the empirical research are expounded, and the sample standard is established, that is, 175 cases of judicial cases in Beijing. And a brief summary of the analysis framework of the paper. Again, pickpocket theft conviction circumstances of the judicial determination. The identification of "carry-on" and the identification law of "public place" are expounded, and the views adopted in judicial practice are found, and the relationship between pickpocketing theft and other types of theft is combed out. The law of conviction is evaluated under the principle of legally prescribed punishment for a crime, and its own views and suggestions are put forward. Finally, the judicial determination of the circumstances of pickpocketing theft sentencing. The relevant sentencing circumstances involved in pickpocketing cases are counted and summarized, and then the relationship between sentencing circumstances and sentencing is compared, and the influence of sentencing circumstances on sentencing is found in the judicial application of pickpocketing theft. And the law of determining the circumstances of sentencing is evaluated under the principle of the adaptation of crime and responsibility, and its own views and suggestions are put forward. In this paper, judicial confirmation as the main line, through the comb of related issues, in order to resolve the dispute on judicial identification. As to the many problems that arise after pickpocketing has been punished, it is no longer meaningful to argue whether it is reasonable to incriminate, how to limit pickpocketing, how to understand pickpocketing, and how to give a clear concept to pickpocketing, which is the most important issue that should be paid attention to. This can also provide an accurate and feasible standard for judicial practice. When the concept of pickpocketing is clear and the constituent elements of pickpocketing are determined, the criminal form of pickpocketing will come naturally. Through the above brief summary, it aims to provide reference for pickpocketing in the judicial application, so as to make the identification of pickpocketing more accurate.
【学位授予单位】：吉林大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2017
【分类号】：D924.35

【相似文献】