非法经营罪问题研究
[Abstract]:The core problem of economic system reform is to deal well with the relationship between government and market, to solve the problems of imperfect market system and excessive government intervention. The trend of unlimited expansion and application of the crime of illegal operation is one of the manifestations of the state's excessive intervention in the market economy, which violates the principle of legally prescribed punishment for a crime against a crime and the principle of modesty of the criminal law. In 1997, the Criminal Law of the people's Republic of China (hereinafter referred to as "Criminal Law") set up the crime of illegal operation, and adopted the legislative technique of combining blank crime with the underlying clause. However, with the development of market economy and the surge of market anomie, the legislative provisions of illegal operation crime can not be dealt with in a leisurely manner. Special Criminal Law, the introduction of a number of judicial interpretations, the expansion of the crime punishment of the type of behavior. However, the connotation and judicial determination of the crime did not become clear but increased the difficulty. We have to rethink the boundaries of illegal business crime and make it a top priority to prevent its unlimited expansion. The vague expression of the content of the illegal business crime, the extension of the underlying clause, the misunderstanding and abuse of the criminal provision in judicial practice are all the existing problems of the crime. Therefore, we should clarify the connotation and extension of the crime of illegal operation in legislation, scientifically and reasonably define the "state regulation", strictly limit the extension of the clause of shrinking bottom, and make clear the criterion of "serious circumstances"; From the judicial point of view, we should further clarify the applicable conditions of the crime of illegal operation, limit the expansion of the judicial interpretation of the crime of illegal operation, and strictly exercise the judicial discretion.
【学位授予单位】:江西财经大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2017
【分类号】:D924.3
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 郑伟;葛立刚;;刑行交叉视野下非法经营法律责任厘定[J];法律适用;2017年03期
2 马宁;王t@;;非法经营罪的认定和适用研究[J];甘肃政法学院学报;2014年06期
3 刘宪权;;操纵证券、期货市场罪“兜底条款”解释规则的建构与应用 抢帽子交易刑法属性辨正[J];中外法学;2013年06期
4 马春晓;;非法经营罪的“口袋化”困境和规范解释路径——基于司法实务的分析立场[J];中国刑事法杂志;2013年06期
5 欧阳本祺;;对非法经营罪兜底性规定的实证分析[J];法学;2012年07期
6 张建军;;论空白罪状的明确性[J];法学;2012年05期
7 高翼飞;;从扩张走向变异:非法经营罪如何摆脱“口袋罪”的宿命[J];政治与法律;2012年03期
8 陈兴良;;刑法的明确性问题:以《刑法》第225条第4项为例的分析[J];中国法学;2011年04期
9 朱昌波;史丹如;;论非法经营罪的现实冲突与完善[J];中国人民公安大学学报(社会科学版);2011年02期
10 丁华宇;;刑法中的兜底性条款探析[J];黑龙江省政法管理干部学院学报;2009年04期
相关博士学位论文 前3条
1 陈超然;非法经营罪适用范围的扩张及其限制研究[D];上海交通大学;2013年
2 杨庆堂;非法经营罪立法及司法适用研究[D];华东政法大学;2009年
3 范德安;非法经营罪研究[D];吉林大学;2009年
相关硕士学位论文 前1条
1 何溢;非法经营罪适用扩大化倾向及对策研究[D];重庆大学;2016年
,本文编号:2292732
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/xingfalunwen/2292732.html