当前位置:主页 > 法律论文 > 刑法论文 >

我国受贿罪主体问题研究

发布时间:2018-10-26 07:56
【摘要】:腐败现象一直成为世界各国普遍关注的重点问题,它不仅严重影响社会经济的发展而且对社会稳定造成极大破坏。目前,我国还处于社会主义发展阶段,法律尚未健全,各种制度还不够完善等种种原因导致腐败问题已经成为当今中国民众最痛恨的社会现象之一。受贿犯罪属于各种腐败犯罪中危害性最大的犯罪,对国家工作人员廉洁性造成极大的侵犯,也降低了政府在民众心中的权威及公信力,给社会公共利益带来巨大的损失。虽然,我国正在通过各种手段加大惩治腐败现象的力度,但是,由于受贿罪主体在我国现行立法上界定范围不够明确,存在很多争议,直接影响司法实践中对受贿罪的打击范围和力度。2009年通过的《刑法修正案(七)》中增加了利用影响力受贿罪的内容,进一步扩大受贿罪的主体范围,对惩治我国腐败现象有一定积极的作用。本文将对受贿罪的主体界定中存在的争议问题进行分析并提出自己的观点。 第一部分通过梳理我国关于受贿罪主体的相关规定,纵向对比分析,研究“受贿罪主体”的法律概念,主要从“国家工作人员”、“准国家工作人员”、“从事公务”以及“依据法律”的概念分别进行分析,从而得出从事公务是国家工作人员的本质特征,依照法律中“法律”的基本范围。 第二部分通过对我国关于受贿罪主体认定存在的问题,针对学术界存在较大争议的几类受贿罪主体一一进行分析,例如,假国家工作人员、医务人员、新闻工作者、人大代表。随着2009年《刑法修正案(七)》的出台,对受贿罪主体方面做了一定程度的完善,但仍存在不足之处,需要进一步的完善和修改。 第三部分通过对国外代表性国家关于受贿罪主体的立法进行梳理和分析,系统研究国外对于受贿罪的立法文本,结合我国特殊国情,为我国受贿罪主体界定提供参考与借鉴。 第四部分通过对受贿罪主体界定中存在的问题进行分析,借鉴国外相关立法和司法实践,总结归纳有益经验。因此,本文试图从完善受贿罪主体界定的若干建议入手,完善我国受贿罪主体认定的相关问题。
[Abstract]:Corruption has always been the focus of attention all over the world. It not only seriously affects the development of social economy but also destroys social stability. At present, our country is still in the stage of socialist development, the law is not perfect, various systems are not perfect and so on, so corruption has become one of the most hated social phenomena in China. The crime of bribery belongs to the most harmful crime among all kinds of corruption crimes, which causes great infringement on the integrity of state functionaries, reduces the authority and credibility of the government in the hearts of the public, and brings huge losses to the public interest. Although our country is increasing the punishment of corruption through various means, however, due to the lack of clear definition of the subject of bribery crime in our current legislation, there are many disputes. It has a direct impact on the scope and intensity of cracking down on bribery in judicial practice. In the Criminal Law Amendment (7) adopted in 2009, the content of the crime of taking bribes with influence has been added, and the scope of the subject of the crime of accepting bribes has been further expanded. It has a positive effect on punishing corruption in our country. This paper analyzes the controversial issues in the definition of the subject of bribery and puts forward its own views. The first part studies the legal concept of "the subject of bribery crime" by combing the relevant provisions about the subject of bribery crime in our country, and through longitudinal comparative analysis, mainly from "state functionary", "quasi-state functionary", The concepts of "engaging in public service" and "according to the law" are analyzed separately, and it is concluded that public service is the essential characteristic of state functionaries, according to the basic scope of "law" in the law. The second part analyzes the problems existing in the identification of the subject of bribery crime in our country, aiming at several types of subject of bribery crime, such as false state staff, medical personnel, journalists, deputies to the National people's Congress, which are controversial in academic circles one by one. With the introduction of the Criminal Law Amendment (7) in 2009, the subject of the crime of accepting bribes has been improved to a certain extent, but there are still some deficiencies, which need to be further improved and modified. The third part through combing and analyzing the legislation of foreign representative countries on the subject of bribery crime systematically studies the legislative text of foreign countries on bribery crime and combines the special situation of our country to provide reference and reference for the definition of subject of bribery crime in our country. The fourth part analyzes the problems existing in the definition of the subject of bribery crime, draws lessons from relevant foreign legislation and judicial practice, and sums up useful experience. Therefore, this paper tries to perfect some suggestions on the definition of the subject of bribery crime, and perfect the related problems of the subject identification of bribery crime in our country.
【学位授予单位】:西南大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2014
【分类号】:D924.392

【相似文献】

相关期刊论文 前7条

1 张乐;;浅析受贿罪中受贿主体[J];科技信息;2010年31期

2 胡雪萍;;受贿罪主体疑难问题探讨[J];社会科学论坛(学术研究卷);2007年02期

3 马艳华;;浅析我国受贿罪主体的扩大[J];法制与社会;2009年31期

4 胡雪萍;;受贿罪主体的立法缺陷及完善对策[J];当代经理人(中旬刊);2006年17期

5 陈艳;;离退休人员可为受贿罪主体探究[J];吉林省教育学院学报(学科版);2010年05期

6 李北京;;受贿罪主体问题初探——兼评《刑法修正案(七)》第十三条[J];法制与社会;2010年03期

7 赵英杰;孙玉来;;受贿罪主体及相关问题的认定[J];黑龙江生态工程职业学院学报;2008年03期

相关硕士学位论文 前5条

1 寇韦弦;我国受贿罪主体问题研究[D];西南大学;2014年

2 余中;我国受贿罪主体若干疑难问题分析[D];西南政法大学;2009年

3 吴培渊;受贿罪主体问题研究[D];中国政法大学;2009年

4 戴嵩杰;受贿罪主体研究[D];中国政法大学;2009年

5 白宇;受贿罪主体研究[D];兰州大学;2006年



本文编号:2295062

资料下载
论文发表

本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/xingfalunwen/2295062.html


Copyright(c)文论论文网All Rights Reserved | 网站地图 |

版权申明:资料由用户c3755***提供,本站仅收录摘要或目录,作者需要删除请E-mail邮箱bigeng88@qq.com