刘代伟集资诈骗主观目的的认定

发布时间：2018-10-31 17:48

【摘要】：近年来我国民间资本市场的发展促进了资本流通,活跃了市场经济。但是民间资本市场发展缺少规范和监管,以民间融资为名的集资诈骗犯罪日益猖獗。集资诈骗犯罪严重侵害了公私财产所有权,扰乱国家金融管理秩序。作为金融诈骗犯罪中危害最为严重的集资诈骗罪,涉案金额往往巨大,受害人数众多、分布范围广,被害人经济损失惨重,甚至会失去赖以生存的基本物质条件。为此,司法实践中应当对集资诈骗行为准确定性,依法打击。但是无论在刑法理论界还是司法实践中,对集资诈骗犯罪认定还有需要探讨的地方。本文分为四个部分,以刘代伟集资诈骗案为例,提出认定集资诈骗罪争议焦点问题,详细分析刑法理论界对争议焦点的不同观点以及司法实践中存在的问题,进而提出认定集资诈骗罪非法占有目的理论分析和司法推定的方法。第一部分介绍刘代伟集资诈骗案的情况。通过对刘代伟案基本案情的分析,介绍了对该案的有争议的处理意见,进而提炼出本文拟研究的焦点问题是非法占有目的认定。第二部分是对集资诈骗主观目的认定的基本法理分析,着重从抽象的角度分析非法占有目的内涵、构成要素、认定主观非法占有目的需要考虑的因素。最后提出认定主观非法占有目的方法。第三部分是将理论与案情具体结合,分析刘代伟主观上产生非法占有目的时间、认定要素和司法推定。此部分通过对刘代伟案例的分析,结合了理论分析和司法推定进行具体案件应用。第四部分是在以上三个部分论述的基础上,分析处理集资诈骗案件时如何从理论和实践两个方面,结合法理分析和司法推定综合审查认定集资诈骗罪非法占有目的。
[Abstract]:In recent years, the development of private capital market in China has promoted the circulation of capital and activated the market economy. However, the development of private capital market is lack of regulation and supervision, and the crime of raising funds in the name of private financing is rampant day by day. The crime of raising funds and defrauding seriously infringes the ownership of public and private property and disturbs the order of national financial management. As the most serious crime of financing fraud in financial fraud, the amount of money involved is often huge, the number of victims is large, the scope of distribution is wide, the victims suffer heavy economic losses, and even the basic material conditions for survival will be lost. Therefore, in judicial practice, the financing fraud should be accurately defined and dealt with in accordance with the law. However, in the criminal law theory and judicial practice, there is still need to explore the crime of fund-raising fraud. This paper is divided into four parts. Taking Liu Daiwei's case of financing fraud as an example, this paper puts forward the issue of identifying the dispute focus of the crime of fraud by raising funds, and analyzes in detail the different viewpoints of the theoretical circle of criminal law on the dispute focus and the problems existing in judicial practice. Then it puts forward the method of theoretical analysis and judicial presumption for the purpose of illegal possession of the crime of financing fraud. The first part introduces Liu Daiwei's case of raising funds and defrauding. Through the analysis of the basic facts of the case of Liu Daiwei, this paper introduces the controversial opinions of handling the case, and then abstracts that the focus of this paper is the identification of the purpose of illegal possession. The second part is the basic legal analysis of the subjective purpose of fund-raising fraud, focusing on the analysis of the purpose of illegal possession from an abstract point of view, the constituent elements, the subjective purpose of illegal possession to consider the factors to be considered. Finally, the paper puts forward a method to identify the objective of subjective illegal possession. The third part is the concrete combination of theory and case to analyze Liu Daiwei's subjective time of illegal possession, identifying elements and judicial presumption. This part through the case of Liu Dawei analysis, combined with theoretical analysis and judicial presumption of the specific case application. The fourth part is on the basis of the above three parts, analysis how to deal with the case of fund-raising fraud from the theoretical and practical two aspects, combined with legal analysis and judicial presumption comprehensive review to determine the purpose of illegal possession of the crime of fund-raising fraud.
【学位授予单位】：西南政法大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2014
【分类号】：D924.3

【参考文献】