招收公务员、学生徇私舞弊罪若干问题研究

发布时间：2018-11-02 11:40

【摘要】：为整治我国在招收公务员、学生工作领域日益严重的徇私舞弊现象,1997年全国人大常委会正式将招收公务员、学生徇私舞弊罪列入我国刑法。随后全国人大常委会、"两高"相继推出涉及本罪名的立法、司法解释。2015年全国人大常委会在《刑法修正案九》第二十五条中增加了考试作弊类犯罪。这一系列立法、司法环节的举措逐渐丰富和完善了我国惩治招收考试徇私舞弊类犯罪的体系。然而当前司法实践中因涉嫌本罪被审判机关定罪的案例并不多,同样的在理论界关于本罪的研究甚少,无法有效打击相应的违法犯罪活动。本罪立法法条简单、理论研究欠缺造成司法实践操作困难,进而影响实际惩治效果。通过对本罪的构成要件展开分析,希望立法机关、司法机关顺应时代变化发展将"国家机关工作人员"、"公务员"、"学生"及"徇私舞弊"等核心要件进行适合本罪的立法、司法解释,使其符合现实生活情况。除此之外,本罪目前现行立案标准已不适用、犯罪完成形态标准模糊都需立法、司法解释用以明确,从而发挥惩治效果。最后《刑九》第二十五条考试作弊类犯罪因此与本罪有差异又有重合,需要出台配套解释,用以完善我国惩治考试作弊类犯罪体系。
[Abstract]:In order to rectify the increasingly serious phenomenon of favoritism and malpractice in the field of recruiting civil servants and students working in our country, the standing Committee of the National people's Congress formally enrolled civil servants in 1997, and the crime of student favoritism and malpractice was included in our criminal law. Subsequently, the NPC standing Committee and the "two High levels" successively introduced legislation and judicial interpretation concerning this crime. In 2015, the NPC standing Committee added the crime of cheating in examination in Article 25 of the Ninth Amendment to the Criminal Law. This series of legislation and judicial measures have gradually enriched and perfected the system of punishing and recruiting malpractices for personal gain in examinations. However, in the current judicial practice, there are not many cases of conviction by the judicial organs because of the suspicion of this crime. Similarly, there are few researches on this crime in the theoretical circle, and it is unable to effectively crack down on the corresponding illegal and criminal activities. This crime legislation law is simple, the lack of theoretical research causes the difficulty of judicial practice operation, and then affects the actual punishment effect. Through the analysis of the constitutive elements of this crime, I hope that the legislature and the judiciary will adapt to the development of the times to "state functionaries", "civil servants", "students" and "favoritism and malpractice" and other core elements of this crime legislation, judicial interpretation, to make it in line with the real life. In addition, the current standard of filing the crime is no longer applicable, the completion of the crime form of fuzzy standards need legislation, judicial interpretation to clarify, so as to give full play to the effect of punishment. Finally, Article 25 of "Criminal Law" has the difference and overlap with this crime, so it is necessary to come up with a necessary explanation to perfect the system of punishing the crime of cheating in examination in our country.
【学位授予单位】：内蒙古大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2017
【分类号】：D924.3

【相似文献】