当前位置:主页 > 法律论文 > 刑法论文 >

招收学生、公务员徇私舞弊罪立法研究

发布时间:2018-11-08 09:05
【摘要】:随着高校毕业生“就业难”问题的日益突出,公务员考试的竞争也越来越激烈,供过于求的现状和公务员的高福利待遇使得在招收公务员过程中出现了大量的徇私舞弊的行为。招收公务员、学生徇私舞弊行为具有严重的社会危害性。因此,《中华人民共和国刑法》在刑法分则第九章渎职罪中设置第418条规制招收公务员、学生徇私舞弊行为,即国家机关工作人员在招收公务员、学生工作中徇私舞弊,情节严重的,处三年以下有期徒刑或者拘役。2005年12月29日通过的《最高人民检察院关于渎职侵权犯罪案件立案标准的规定》(以下简称《规定》)在第34条规定了本罪的立案标准。近年来,最高人民检察院发文要严查招收公务员徇私舞弊等八类渎职侵权犯罪。但是,在刑法学界和司法实务界,对本罪的研究较少,在司法实践中,一系列与招收公务员、学生徇私舞弊行为类似的新情况的出现,给司法实务人员在司法认定中带来了困惑,因此,为了更好的惩治本罪,本文将对此罪的立法状况展开研究。 本文分为三章,具体如下: 本文第一章是“国内外招收公务员、学生徇私舞弊罪的立法现状”,在本章中,笔者意图通过比较法的角度对本罪的国内外立法例展开研究。首先,笔者对我国招收公务员、学生徇私舞弊罪的立法现状展开评析,同时归纳出目前本罪的犯罪构成要件的内容,以及我国关于本罪的立法特点。其次,笔者对国外相关国家和地区关于本罪的立法现状展开评析,总结出国外立法例关于本罪的立法特点。 本文第二章是“我国招收公务员、学生徇私舞弊罪的立法评析”,在本章中,笔者通过对本罪的立法缺陷展开细致深入的探讨,主要是从以下几个方面:本罪的行为对象、本罪的时空范围、本罪的立案标准、本罪罪数、本罪的法定刑以及本罪与相关法律法规的衔接等方面展开。 本文第三章是“我国招收公务员、学生徇私舞弊罪的立法完善”,在本章中,笔者通过上文的论述,展开对我国招收公务员、学生徇私舞弊罪的立法完善的思考和建议。首先,笔者阐述对本罪进行立法完善应该遵循的原则,然后,笔者从多方面具体阐述完善本罪的立法思考和建议。
[Abstract]:With the increasingly prominent problem of "difficult employment" for college graduates, the competition for civil servants' examinations is becoming more and more fierce. The oversupply and the high welfare treatment of civil servants make a large number of malpractices for favoritism in the process of recruiting civil servants. Recruitment of civil servants, students favoritism fraud has serious social harm. Therefore, the Criminal Law of the people's Republic of China establishes Article 418 in Chapter 9 of the Criminal Law Sub-Clause of Criminal Law to regulate the admission of civil servants, students engaging in malpractices for personal gain, that is, the recruitment of civil servants by State officials, and malpractices by students in their work, If the circumstances are serious, "the provisions of the Supreme people's Procuratorate on filing Standards for cases of malfeasance and infringement" (hereinafter referred to as "provisions"), adopted on December 29, 2005, set forth the standard for filing this crime in Article 34. In recent years, the Supreme people's Procuratorate has issued papers to investigate eight types of crimes of malfeasance, such as malpractice for favoritism and malpractice. However, in the field of criminal law and judicial practice, there are few researches on this crime. In judicial practice, a series of new situations similar to the recruitment of civil servants and students' practice of favoritism and malpractice appear. So, in order to punish this crime better, this article will carry on the research to the legislation condition of this crime. This article is divided into three chapters: the first chapter of this article is "the domestic and foreign civil servants, students favoritism fraud crime legislation status quo", in this chapter, the author intends to study the domestic and foreign legislation of this crime through the perspective of comparative law. First of all, the author evaluates the current legislative situation of recruiting civil servants and students for favoritism and fraud, and sums up the content of the elements of the crime, as well as the legislative characteristics of this crime in our country. Secondly, the author analyzes the current legislative situation of foreign countries and regions on this crime, summarizes the legislative characteristics of foreign legislation cases on this crime. The second chapter of this article is "our country enroll the civil servant, the student favoritism fraud crime legislation appraisal", in this chapter, the author through to this crime legislation flaw launches the detailed thorough discussion, is mainly from the following several aspects: this crime behavior object, The scope of time and space of the crime, the standard of filing the crime, the number of the crime, the legal penalty of the crime and the connection between the crime and the relevant laws and regulations. The third chapter of this article is "our country enroll the civil servant, the student favoritism fraud crime legislation consummation", in this chapter, the author through the above discussion, launches to our country enrol the civil servant, the student favoritism fraud crime legislation consummation ponder and the suggestion. First of all, the author expounds the principles that should be followed in the legislative perfection of this crime, and then, the author expounds the legislative thinking and suggestions from various aspects to perfect the crime.
【学位授予单位】:甘肃政法学院
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2014
【分类号】:D924.393

【参考文献】

相关期刊论文 前10条

1 张曦;李益明;;司法规律与检查权配置的协调性[J];重庆行政;2008年04期

2 陈玉范;试论招收公务员、学生徇私舞弊罪[J];当代法学;2002年12期

3 张明楷;论刑法的谦抑性[J];法商研究(中南政法学院学报);1995年04期

4 苏彩霞;;刑法价值判断的实体性论证规则[J];华东政法大学学报;2008年01期

5 邱赛兰;徇私舞弊型渎职犯罪的罪数认定[J];湖南公安高等专科学校学报;2003年03期

6 孙仁丕;;招收学生徇私舞弊罪的几个问题探讨[J];荆楚理工学院学报;2009年12期

7 冯亚东;受贿罪与渎职罪竞合问题[J];法学研究;2000年01期

8 黎宏;;论渎职罪中的两个问题[J];中国检察官;2011年11期

9 张明楷;;渎职罪中“徇私”、“舞弊”的性质与认定[J];人民检察;2005年23期

10 肖中华;渎职罪认定中的几个共性问题探析[J];法学论坛;2001年05期

相关博士学位论文 前1条

1 孟凡君;中国犯罪定量规定模式的反思与重构[D];吉林大学;2010年



本文编号:2318013

资料下载
论文发表

本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/xingfalunwen/2318013.html


Copyright(c)文论论文网All Rights Reserved | 网站地图 |

版权申明:资料由用户d03ff***提供,本站仅收录摘要或目录,作者需要删除请E-mail邮箱bigeng88@qq.com