国家垄断刑罚权利弊得失论
发布时间：2018-11-13 08:32
【摘要】：从历史上看,国家必然垄断刑罚权；从当代社会发展的角度来看,国家必须放弃垄断权。纵观历史,国家垄断刑罚权有利有弊,随着社会不断的进步和发展,刑法如何更科学积极的起到其应尽的义务是本文重点探讨的内容,笔者认为恢复型刑罚与传统型刑罚相结合更适合缓解目前多元化的社会矛盾发展趋势,同时,刑罚的商业化更能起到推波助澜的作用。本文从多方面分析了国家垄断刑罚权的利弊得失,并提出引入恢复型刑罚与传统型刑罚相结合来更好的处理犯罪问题的建议。第一部分分别以英美法系的美国、大陆法系的德国及新中国为样本详细分析了国家垄断刑罚权状态下的刑事司法制度。第二部分详细分析了历史上三次犯罪高峰的成因及当代全球犯罪形势从而提出国家垄断刑罚权是否能够解决所有犯罪的问题。第三部分具体分析了国家垄断刑罚权的利弊。从理论上分析了国家垄断刑罚权是个必然趋势,但是随着社会进步到现阶段,国家面对的刑事犯罪已不再是原来垄断初期的那种单纯的私人仇视,而是完全演化为大规模的技术犯、政策范、法定犯、行政犯等等。国家垄断刑罚权的治理路径是单一的,也是唯一的,它无法完全顺应历史的潮流。第四部分提出对国家垄断刑罚权的改良和我国的刑罚制度创新,针对这个问题,提出恢复型司法的辅助传统型司法的解决思路,并建议部分刑罚资源采取市场化操作。
[Abstract]:From the historical point of view, the state must monopolize the power of penalty, and from the angle of the development of contemporary society, the state must give up the monopoly power. Throughout history, the state monopoly penal power has advantages and disadvantages, with the continuous progress and development of society, criminal law how to play a more scientific and positive role in its obligations is the focus of this paper. The author thinks that the combination of recovery penalty and traditional penalty is more suitable to alleviate the development trend of social contradiction, and at the same time, the commercialization of penalty can play a more important role. This paper analyzes the advantages and disadvantages of the state monopoly penalty right from many aspects, and puts forward some suggestions to better deal with the crime problem by introducing the recovery penalty and the traditional penalty. The first part takes the United States of America, Germany and New China as samples to analyze the criminal justice system under the state of state monopoly penalty power in detail. The second part analyzes in detail the causes of the three crime peaks in history and the contemporary global crime situation, and puts forward whether the state monopoly criminal power can solve the problem of all crimes. The third part analyzes the advantages and disadvantages of the state monopoly penalty power. This paper theoretically analyzes the inevitable trend of the state monopoly on penalty power, but with the progress of society, the criminal crimes faced by the state are no longer the pure private hatred of the original monopoly at the beginning of the period. But completely evolved into large-scale technical offenders, policy norms, statutory offenders, administrative offenders and so on. The governance path of state monopoly penalty power is single and unique, and it can not completely conform to the trend of history. The fourth part puts forward the improvement of the state monopoly penalty right and the innovation of the penalty system in our country. In view of this problem, the author puts forward the solution to this problem and suggests that some penalty resources should be market-oriented.
【学位授予单位】：复旦大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2014
【分类号】：D924.1
本文编号：2328566
[Abstract]:From the historical point of view, the state must monopolize the power of penalty, and from the angle of the development of contemporary society, the state must give up the monopoly power. Throughout history, the state monopoly penal power has advantages and disadvantages, with the continuous progress and development of society, criminal law how to play a more scientific and positive role in its obligations is the focus of this paper. The author thinks that the combination of recovery penalty and traditional penalty is more suitable to alleviate the development trend of social contradiction, and at the same time, the commercialization of penalty can play a more important role. This paper analyzes the advantages and disadvantages of the state monopoly penalty right from many aspects, and puts forward some suggestions to better deal with the crime problem by introducing the recovery penalty and the traditional penalty. The first part takes the United States of America, Germany and New China as samples to analyze the criminal justice system under the state of state monopoly penalty power in detail. The second part analyzes in detail the causes of the three crime peaks in history and the contemporary global crime situation, and puts forward whether the state monopoly criminal power can solve the problem of all crimes. The third part analyzes the advantages and disadvantages of the state monopoly penalty power. This paper theoretically analyzes the inevitable trend of the state monopoly on penalty power, but with the progress of society, the criminal crimes faced by the state are no longer the pure private hatred of the original monopoly at the beginning of the period. But completely evolved into large-scale technical offenders, policy norms, statutory offenders, administrative offenders and so on. The governance path of state monopoly penalty power is single and unique, and it can not completely conform to the trend of history. The fourth part puts forward the improvement of the state monopoly penalty right and the innovation of the penalty system in our country. In view of this problem, the author puts forward the solution to this problem and suggests that some penalty resources should be market-oriented.
【学位授予单位】：复旦大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2014
【分类号】：D924.1
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前2条
1 程荣斌;侯东亮;;恢复性司法的核心价值:尊重和修复[J];西部法学评论;2009年06期
2 于志刚;;犯罪的规范性评价和非规范性评价[J];政法论坛;2011年02期
，本文编号：2328566
本文链接：https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/xingfalunwen/2328566.html
