财产犯罪侵犯法益研究
[Abstract]:The crime of infringing property is one of the types of crimes which are dealt with by many countries, and the researchers of criminal law all over the world have carried on the key research on this type of crime. However, the criminal law researchers at home and abroad have not reached a consensus on the legal benefits of property crime infringement, and are still in the process of research and discussion. The debate on this issue is very fierce in both theoretical and practical circles. Criminal law researchers in Germany, Japan and other civil law countries have the most in-depth and extensive discussion on this issue. The mainstream theories such as the property theory of German law, the property theory of economy, the property theory of legal economy, and the theory of original right of Japan, Possessive theory, intermediate theory, but still with the economic and social development, the theory is constantly updating and transformation. There are many disputes about the legal benefits of property crime infringement in the field of criminal law of our country, which leads to the difference of qualitative and accurate sentencing of property crime in judicial practice, which makes the judicial personnel not uniform in the process of conviction and sentencing. To some extent, it affects the justice and authority of the judicature, so it is very necessary to know why the legal interests of property crime encroach. The author discusses the legal interests of property crime infringement from three aspects in the main body. The first part combs the legal interest theory of property crime infringement outside the country and introduces the relevant theories and comments. In the second part, the author analyzes the various theories of property crime infringing legal interests in criminal law circles of our country, combined with the study of the theory of property crime law interest outside China, and draws the viewpoint of this article about property crime infringing legal interests. The third part clarifies the rationality of the theory of ownership as a legal interest of property crime in our country. At the present stage of our country, the fundamental purpose of property crime is to protect the social order of ownership, and the protection of property cannot violate this fundamental purpose, so it is appropriate to insist on the theory of ownership.
【学位授予单位】:沈阳师范大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2017
【分类号】:D924.35
【相似文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 L.汉农,新馨;犯罪机会论和贫困与财产犯罪的关系[J];国外社会科学;2003年01期
2 石晓华;薛荣金;;在校大学生财产犯罪原因与预防对策分析[J];社会科学论坛(学术研究卷);2008年04期
3 李锡海;张勇志;;现代化与财产犯罪[J];法学杂志;2009年12期
4 汤蕴诗;;略论财产犯罪中的占有[J];法制与社会;2011年12期
5 范卫国;陈中丁;;论女大学生财产犯罪[J];辽宁公安司法管理干部学院学报;2014年01期
6 陈屹立;;收入差距、经济增长与中国的财产犯罪——1978-2005年的实证研究[J];法制与社会发展;2007年05期
7 李晓璞;;试论财产犯罪中占有转移认定的几个问题[J];法制与社会;2009年23期
8 蔡鹤;陈山;;成都市街面财产犯罪调查[J];法制与社会;2010年01期
9 汪瑶;;利用金融债权凭证型财产犯罪研究[J];法制与社会;2011年12期
10 黄玉丽;新城区财产犯罪走势及对策[J];广西法学;1995年03期
相关会议论文 前2条
1 刘四新;;恩格尔定律与财产犯罪[A];2007年全国法经济学论坛论文集[C];2007年
2 庞建兵;;金融系统计算机财产犯罪特点、方式及检查方法[A];第十三届全国计算机安全技术交流会论文集[C];1998年
相关重要报纸文章 前6条
1 浙江省金华市婺城区检察院 唐源;财产犯罪的未完成形态数额起点应统一[N];检察日报;2007年
2 马晓霞;不当得利与财产犯罪的关系[N];江苏经济报;2014年
3 河南省驻马店市人民检察院检察长 张志超;遏制“两抢一盗”须严惩收赃犯罪[N];检察日报;2008年
4 黎宏;刑法保护“不法现实占有关系”的理论支撑[N];检察日报;2005年
5 北京市海淀区检察院 罗猛;地震中侵犯受灾财产犯罪的法理分析[N];检察日报;2008年
6 姜堰市检察院 杨广云 郑大鸣;建议修改《刑法》第三百一十二条[N];江苏法制报;2009年
相关博士学位论文 前2条
1 邓超;财产犯罪原理论[D];中国政法大学;2007年
2 王玉珏;刑法中的财产性质及财产控制关系研究[D];华东政法大学;2008年
相关硕士学位论文 前10条
1 孙悦s,
本文编号:2341641
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/xingfalunwen/2341641.html