网络环境下诽谤罪的司法适用和完善
发布时间：2018-11-20 07:47
【摘要】：近年来,随着移动网络的普及化人们实现了随时随地上网,移动网络的迅速发展带给人们便利的同时也为网络环境中诽谤的滋生和传播提供了更宽阔的平台,增加了发生网络诽谤案件的机率。针对逐年上升的网络诽谤,我国在2013年9月9日出台了《最高人民法院、最高人民检察院关于办理利用信息网络实施诽谤等刑事案件适用法律若干问题的解释》。该《司法解释》的出台解决了在办理网络诽谤案件时的一部分实际操作当中的认定问题,与以往宽泛和模糊的定罪标准相比具有更强和突出的操作性。但是由于网络本身具有的复杂环境和特点,司法解释能不能经得住司法实践中的考验还是一个未知数。虽然新出台的解释为网络诽谤的司法适用提供了一定的法律依据,但是由于我国目前还没有出台任何关于网络犯罪的专门性法律。因此,司法解释的出台并不等于说该司法解释是完善的。本文通过找出在实践中认定和处罚网络诽谤时与司法解释相矛盾的问题,试图完善和弥补具体运用司法解释解决网络诽谤案件时出现的缺陷。 本文共分为五个部分,第一部分是研究背景,研究目的与意义,研究方法。第二部分主要是阐述我国关于诽谤罪和网络诽谤的规定,第三部分主要分析了新司法解释出台后,在适用时出现的与之相矛盾的问题,第四部分通过提出问题和借鉴韩日的做法的基础上,提出了完善司法解释的几点建议。
[Abstract]:In recent years, with the popularization of mobile network, people have realized the Internet anytime, anywhere, the rapid development of mobile network brings people convenience, but also provides a wider platform for the breeding and dissemination of libel in the network environment. Increased the chance of internet libel cases. In view of the increasing number of Internet libel, on September 9, 2013, our country issued the explanation of the Supreme people's Court and the Supreme people's Procuratorate on the application of law in criminal cases such as using information network to carry out libel. The introduction of the judicial interpretation resolves the problem of cognizance in part of the actual operation in dealing with the online libel cases, and it has stronger and more outstanding maneuverability compared with the broad and vague conviction standard in the past. However, due to the complex environment and characteristics of the network itself, whether the judicial interpretation can stand the test of judicial practice is still unknown. Although the new interpretation provides a legal basis for the judicial application of network libel, there is no special law on network crime in our country at present. Therefore, the introduction of judicial interpretation does not mean that the judicial interpretation is perfect. This paper tries to perfect and make up for the defects in using judicial interpretation to solve network libel cases by identifying and punishing the contradiction between online libel and judicial interpretation in practice. This paper is divided into five parts, the first part is the research background, research purpose and significance, research methods. The second part is mainly about the stipulation of libel and network libel in our country. The third part mainly analyzes the contradictory problems that appear when the new judicial interpretation comes out. The fourth part puts forward some suggestions to perfect judicial interpretation on the basis of raising questions and drawing lessons from Korea and Japan.
【学位授予单位】：延边大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2014
【分类号】：D924.34
本文编号：2344301
[Abstract]:In recent years, with the popularization of mobile network, people have realized the Internet anytime, anywhere, the rapid development of mobile network brings people convenience, but also provides a wider platform for the breeding and dissemination of libel in the network environment. Increased the chance of internet libel cases. In view of the increasing number of Internet libel, on September 9, 2013, our country issued the explanation of the Supreme people's Court and the Supreme people's Procuratorate on the application of law in criminal cases such as using information network to carry out libel. The introduction of the judicial interpretation resolves the problem of cognizance in part of the actual operation in dealing with the online libel cases, and it has stronger and more outstanding maneuverability compared with the broad and vague conviction standard in the past. However, due to the complex environment and characteristics of the network itself, whether the judicial interpretation can stand the test of judicial practice is still unknown. Although the new interpretation provides a legal basis for the judicial application of network libel, there is no special law on network crime in our country at present. Therefore, the introduction of judicial interpretation does not mean that the judicial interpretation is perfect. This paper tries to perfect and make up for the defects in using judicial interpretation to solve network libel cases by identifying and punishing the contradiction between online libel and judicial interpretation in practice. This paper is divided into five parts, the first part is the research background, research purpose and significance, research methods. The second part is mainly about the stipulation of libel and network libel in our country. The third part mainly analyzes the contradictory problems that appear when the new judicial interpretation comes out. The fourth part puts forward some suggestions to perfect judicial interpretation on the basis of raising questions and drawing lessons from Korea and Japan.
【学位授予单位】：延边大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2014
【分类号】：D924.34
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前8条
1 杨江滢;;网络诽谤认定初探[J];哈尔滨市委党校学报;2010年05期
2 邱灵;;网络诽谤行为的定性分析[J];中国检察官;2011年02期
3 陈灿;;诽谤罪的立法完善研究[J];科技创业月刊;2011年06期
4 最高人民法院刑三庭课题组;薛美琴;;利用网络实施的诽谤犯罪研究[J];人民司法;2012年21期
5 于冲;;“网络打手”的刑法规制[J];上海政法学院学报(法治论丛);2011年04期
6 赵远;;网络诽谤的刑事责任问题研究[J];中国刑事法杂志;2010年08期
7 于志刚;;网络犯罪与中国刑法应对[J];中国社会科学;2010年03期
8 黄芙蓉;;新媒体时代网络诽谤的构成与责任探析[J];学习与实践;2013年12期
，本文编号：2344301
本文链接：https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/xingfalunwen/2344301.html
