食品安全监管渎职犯罪犯罪的侦查对策研究

发布时间：2018-11-23 08:33

【摘要】：本文除了引言和结语,共分为五个部分,二万五千字左右。第一部分从食品安全、食品安全监管体制及食品安全监管渎职犯罪的区别与联系入手,旨在揭示食品安全犯罪和食品安全监管渎职犯罪各自侦查的重点和联系;然后总结了食品安全监管渎职犯罪的两种表现形式。第二部分是对我国食品安全监管渎职犯罪特点的概述,包括犯罪主体的复杂化、犯罪涉及面的广泛化、犯罪隐秘性强等内容;接着提出现阶段食品安全监管渎职犯罪领域存在的侦查困境,其中又包括刑事主体认定难、案件发现难、案件取证难、犯罪查处难等4方面存在的问题。第三部分落脚点为我国食品安全监管渎职犯罪的形成原因分析,主要分析了4方面的原因:权力的滥用以及监督机制的失衡;刑罚的刑责较轻,惩罚力度不够;定罪的概率低,威慑力弱;最后是社会监督渠道的不明朗。第四部分是本文的重点章节,主要是结合上文的侦查困境所提出的食品安全监管渎职犯罪的侦查对策。首先,拓宽信息收集来源,从健全举报受理机制,分析、研判、筛选案件线索,完善提前介入机制以及整合检察机关内部资源等角度展开论述。接着的对策是准确选取侦查途径,分别以人和地方为切入点展开调查。其次重点阐述了合理调查取证以及全面展开侦查活动,重点从核查线索、搜查扣押物证书证、如何寻找突破口以及外围取证进行系统分析。最后,从建立并完善行政执法与刑事司法相衔接机制、加强与其他机关的联系沟通、完善介入重大责任事故调查机制、增强惩罚和预防食品安全领域渎职犯罪的合力等四个方面提出加强协作配合这个侦查对策论点。第五部分提出了侦防一体化机制的建立的必要性。主要从4个方面加以佐证:积极开展专项防御工作,建立及运用侦防一体化机制,做好案外延伸工作,以及加强舆论宣传和法制教育工作的重要性。
[Abstract]:In addition to the introduction and conclusion, this article is divided into five parts, about 25000 words. The first part starts with the difference and connection of food safety, food safety supervision system and malfeasance crime of food safety supervision, aiming to reveal the focal points and connections of food safety crime and food safety supervision dereliction of duty crime. Then summarized the food safety supervision dereliction of duty crime of two manifestations. The second part is an overview of the characteristics of dereliction of duty in food safety supervision in China, including the complexity of the subject of the crime, the extensive scope of the crime, the strong secrecy of crime and so on. Then it points out the investigation difficulties in the field of dereliction of duty in food safety supervision at this stage, including the difficulties in the identification of criminal subject, the difficulty in finding cases, the difficulty in obtaining evidence in cases, and the difficulty in investigating and dealing with crimes. The third part analyzes the causes of malfeasance crime of food safety supervision in China, mainly analyzes the four reasons: abuse of power and imbalance of supervision mechanism; The probability of conviction is low, the deterrent is weak; finally, the social supervision channel is not clear. The fourth part is the key chapter of this paper, mainly combined with the above investigation dilemma proposed by the food safety supervision of malfeasance crime investigation countermeasures. First of all, broaden the sources of information collection, from the perspective of improving the report acceptance mechanism, analysis, judgment, screening clues, improving the mechanism of early intervention and integration of internal resources of procuratorial organs, and so on. Then the countermeasure is to select the way of investigation accurately, and carry out the investigation with people and places as the starting point respectively. Secondly, it focuses on reasonable investigation and investigation activities, focusing on verification clues, search seizure certificate, how to find a breakthrough and external evidence for systematic analysis. Finally, from establishing and perfecting the link mechanism between administrative law enforcement and criminal justice, strengthening the communication with other organs, and perfecting the investigation mechanism of major liability accidents, This paper puts forward the point of strengthening cooperation and cooperating with the investigation countermeasure from four aspects: strengthening punishment and preventing malfeasance crime in the field of food safety. The fifth part puts forward the necessity of establishing the integrated mechanism of investigation and prevention. It is mainly proved from four aspects: to actively develop special defense work, to establish and apply the mechanism of investigation and prevention integration, to do well the extension work outside the case, and to strengthen the importance of publicity of public opinion and education of legal system.
【学位授予单位】：西南政法大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2015
【分类号】：D924.393

【相似文献】