预备行为实行化研究

发布时间：2018-11-28 14:52

【摘要】：预备行为实行化,在某种程度上来说,是风险社会的产物,也是顺应时代的产物。为了更好地打击犯罪与保障人权,我国刑法将某些特定领域的预备行为,将其在分则中以独立罪名予以规制,并配以独立的法定刑,这种立法现象我们将其称之为“预备行为实行化”。《刑法修正案(九)》中新规定的“准备从事恐怖活动罪”和“准备网络违法犯罪活动罪”就是典型的代表。对于该问题的研究,虽出发点是“中国的”,但其理论背景则是“世界的”。文章结合法教义学和刑事政策,揭示预备行为实行化的理论根据,并试图通过限制“预备行为”和“法益侵害”,来探寻一种界定预备行为实行化的标准。通过梳理和研究其他国家刑法理论对于预备犯、预备罪等的相关规定,进而为我国预备行为实行化后的司法加功、助力,真正实现其本土化转化。全文共计3万多字,从导论至结语共六个部分。第一部分“导论”,该部分主要介绍了文章的写作背景及结构,并通过中国知网,对国内外有关预备行为实行化的文献进行综述。第二部分“预备行为实行化的国内外立法考察”,主要考察预备行为实行化的相关立法规定,从大陆法系和英美法系中找寻预备行为实行化这一立法现象诞生的背景,从而为我国的预备行为实行化提供指导与借鉴。第三部分与第四部分是文章的核心内容,也是文章重点论述对象,同时也是文章的一大创新点。这两大部分综合运用法教义学和刑事政策学,旨在为预备行为实行化的出现寻找有力根据。其中第三部分“预备行为实行化的根据”涉及到“重罪的预备行为实行化”与“查处高难度的预备行为实行化”这两大概念。第四部分“预备行为实行化的标准”,通过对“预备行为”和“法益侵害”进行限制,从而正确认识到哪些预备行为可将其作为实行犯对待。第五部分“预备行为实行化后的司法认定”,该部分主要谈论了预备行为实行化后的主从犯认定、罪数形态认定以及特殊形态认定,从而为司法实践活动中遇到相关难题进行答疑解惑,以期更好地实现立法与实践的相统一。结语部分总结全文,并在此基础上回答导论中所提能否将预备行为实行化扩大到食品犯罪等相关严重犯罪领域。
[Abstract]:To a certain extent, the practice of preparatory behavior is the product of risk society and the result of complying with the times. In order to better combat crime and protect human rights, the criminal law of our country regulates the preparatory acts in certain specific fields, which are regulated by independent charges in the special provisions, and is accompanied by independent legal penalties. This kind of legislative phenomenon is called "the practice of preparatory act". The new provisions of "preparing for terrorist activity" and "preparing for the crime of network illegal activities" in the Criminal Law Amendment (9) are typical representatives. Although the starting point of the study is "China's", its theoretical background is "World". Combined with the doctrine of law and criminal policy, this paper reveals the theoretical basis for the implementation of preparatory act, and tries to explore a standard to define the practice of preparatory act by restricting "preparatory act" and "legal interest infringement". By combing and studying the relevant provisions of other countries' criminal law theory for the preparatory crime and so on, the author can add the judicial power and help to realize the localization of the preparatory act in our country. The full text amounts to more than 30, 000 words, from the introduction to the conclusion altogether six parts. The first part "introduction", this part mainly introduces the writing background and the structure of the article, and through the Chinese knowledge network, carries on the summary to the domestic and foreign related preparatory behavior implementation literature. The second part is "the domestic and foreign legislative investigation of the implementation of preparatory acts", which mainly examines the relevant legislative provisions of the implementation of preparatory acts, and looks for the background of the birth of the legislative phenomenon of the implementation of preparatory acts from the civil law system and the Anglo-American legal system. Thus provides the guidance and the reference for our country's preparatory behavior implementation. The third part and the fourth part are the core content of the article, which is also the main object of the article, and also a great innovation point of the article. The purpose of these two parts is to find a strong basis for the emergence of the practice of preparatory acts. The third part "the basis of the implementation of the preparatory act" involves the two concepts of "the implementation of the preparatory act of felony" and "the implementation of the preparatory act of the high difficulty of investigation and punishment". In the fourth part, "the standard of the practice of preparatory act", through the restriction of "preparatory act" and "legal interest infringement", the author correctly recognizes which preparatory act can be treated as a practicing offense. The fifth part is "Judicial cognizance after the implementation of the preparatory act". This part mainly discusses the principal and subordinate criminal identification, the crime number form determination and the special form confirmation after the preparatory act is implemented. In order to better realize the unification of legislation and practice, we can solve the problems in judicial practice. The conclusion part summarizes the full text, and on this basis answers the question whether the preparatory act can be extended to food crime and other related serious crimes.
【学位授予单位】：扬州大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2017
【分类号】：D924.3

【相似文献】