论共同犯罪的犯罪中止
发布时间：2018-12-07 18:54
【摘要】：我国刑法规定了犯罪中止的成立标准。这个标准在单独犯罪中适用并无争议,但是在共同犯罪中适用却遇到了一些问题。比如：共同犯罪中止的有效性是否要以犯罪结果的未发生为条件,共同犯罪中止的有效性是否要求犯罪结果的未发生与中止行为间具有因果关系。本文参考国内外各种学说以及立法例,从因果关系的角度入手,认为我国共同犯罪中止应符合时空性、自动性、彻底性、有效性四要件,而有效性在共同犯罪中的内涵是：消除先前行为与犯罪结果间的因果关系,即消除心理上和物理上对共同犯罪的加功合力。 第一章,主要介绍相关概念并引出共同犯罪中止的争议问题。 第二章,主要介绍大陆法系国家的学说及立法例,评析其中客观主义学说、主观主义学说和折中主义学说的优势和不足,在不同学说的交流和冲突中寻找适合我国共同犯罪中止的认定标准。 第三章,主要论述共同犯罪中止的认定标准。笔者立足我国的法律规定和司法实践,认为共同犯罪中止的成立条件为时空性、自动性、彻底性、有效性。并具体分析各要件在共同犯罪中止中适用的内涵。 第四章,主要是将共同犯罪中止的标准具体运用到实践中,指导对于组织犯、实行犯、帮助犯和教唆犯中止的认定。
[Abstract]:The criminal law of our country stipulates the standard of establishment of the suspension of crime. The application of this standard in individual crimes is not controversial, but it has encountered some problems in joint crime. For example, whether the validity of the suspension of joint crime should be conditional on the non-occurrence of the result of the crime, and whether the validity of the suspension of the joint crime requires a causal relationship between the non-occurrence of the result of the crime and the suspension of the act. From the angle of causality, the author thinks that the suspension of joint crime in our country should conform to the four elements of space-time, automaticity, thoroughness and validity. The connotation of effectiveness in joint crime is to eliminate the causality between the former behavior and the result of the crime, that is, to eliminate the psychological and physical added power to the joint crime. The first chapter mainly introduces the related concepts and leads to the dispute of the suspension of joint crime. The second chapter mainly introduces the theories and legislative examples of civil law countries, and analyzes the advantages and disadvantages of objectivism, subjectivism and eclecticism. In the exchange of different theories and conflicts to find suitable for our joint crime suspension standards. The third chapter, mainly discusses the determination standard of joint crime suspension. Based on the legal regulations and judicial practice of our country, the author thinks that the conditions for the suspension of joint crime are space-time, automatization, thoroughness and validity. And concretely analyzes the connotation that each element applies in the joint crime suspension. The fourth chapter mainly applies the standard of discontinuation of joint crime to practice, instructs the determination of discontinuation of organized, practicing, aiding and abetting criminals.
【学位授予单位】：广西大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2014
【分类号】：D924.1
本文编号：2367668
[Abstract]:The criminal law of our country stipulates the standard of establishment of the suspension of crime. The application of this standard in individual crimes is not controversial, but it has encountered some problems in joint crime. For example, whether the validity of the suspension of joint crime should be conditional on the non-occurrence of the result of the crime, and whether the validity of the suspension of the joint crime requires a causal relationship between the non-occurrence of the result of the crime and the suspension of the act. From the angle of causality, the author thinks that the suspension of joint crime in our country should conform to the four elements of space-time, automaticity, thoroughness and validity. The connotation of effectiveness in joint crime is to eliminate the causality between the former behavior and the result of the crime, that is, to eliminate the psychological and physical added power to the joint crime. The first chapter mainly introduces the related concepts and leads to the dispute of the suspension of joint crime. The second chapter mainly introduces the theories and legislative examples of civil law countries, and analyzes the advantages and disadvantages of objectivism, subjectivism and eclecticism. In the exchange of different theories and conflicts to find suitable for our joint crime suspension standards. The third chapter, mainly discusses the determination standard of joint crime suspension. Based on the legal regulations and judicial practice of our country, the author thinks that the conditions for the suspension of joint crime are space-time, automatization, thoroughness and validity. And concretely analyzes the connotation that each element applies in the joint crime suspension. The fourth chapter mainly applies the standard of discontinuation of joint crime to practice, instructs the determination of discontinuation of organized, practicing, aiding and abetting criminals.
【学位授予单位】：广西大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2014
【分类号】：D924.1
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 魏建文;;论主客观相统一原则在犯罪论中的贯彻——兼论丢失枪支不报罪的犯罪构成[J];法学杂志;2012年04期
2 黄铭宇;;关于共同犯罪中止犯的研究——中、日理论的比较分析[J];法制与社会;2009年22期
3 丁善超;;“部分实行、全部责任”新探[J];法制与社会;2010年19期
4 乔恒顺;;共同犯罪中止的研究[J];法制与社会;2011年07期
5 叶远鹏;童琳琳;;论共犯关系的脱离[J];贵州警官职业学院学报;2008年04期
6 李鹏;;共同犯罪中犯罪未遂与中止[J];法制博览(中旬刊);2013年04期
7 张明楷;;简论部分的中止[J];法学杂志;2013年04期
8 宫钰;;论共同犯罪中的部分共犯中止[J];法制博览(中旬刊);2013年10期
9 陈兴良;;主客观相统一原则：价值论与方法论的双重清理[J];法学研究;2007年05期
10 肖扬宇;;共犯中止条件的现实挑战及重构[J];河南科技大学学报(社会科学版);2012年04期
，本文编号：2367668
本文链接：https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/xingfalunwen/2367668.html
