二元集合法益与累积犯形态研究——法定犯与自然犯混同情形下对污染环境罪“严重污染环境”的解释

发布时间：2018-12-12 00:13

【摘要】：司法解释对"严重污染环境"列举的十七种具体情形属性各异,导致污染环境罪认定存在行为犯与结果犯交叉、法定犯与自然犯混同以及直接结果和间接结果混同的难题。这背后的原因在于环境法益人本主义、生态主义与秩序主义的定位纷争以及污染环境罪实害犯抑或抽象危险犯的定性困境,进一步探究其教义学根源则在于揭示集合法益的一元主义定性之弊。从发生学意义言之,集合法益应具备目标属性的个体法益和基础属性的超个体法益之整合二元性,受其决定环境法益应界定为以个体法益保护为目标的生态环境体系性法益。进一步根据集合法益和环境法益的特点,可以确定污染环境罪的累积危险犯属性,进而明晰"严重污染环境"作为界定累积危险机能的对象局部破坏性、普遍实施可能性和个体法益威胁性之三元特征。
[Abstract]:The 17 specific circumstances listed by judicial interpretation of "serious pollution of the environment" have different attributes, which lead to the problems of the identification of the crime of pollution of the environment that the behavior crime and the resultant crime are intersected, the legal crime and the natural crime are mixed together, and the direct and indirect results are mixed together. The reasons behind this lie in the position disputes between humanism of environmental law, ecologism and orderism, as well as the qualitative dilemma of the crime of pollution of the environment or the crime of abstract danger. Further exploration of its doctrinal roots lies in revealing the disadvantages of the unitary nature of collective legal interests. From the perspective of generology, the combination of individual legal interests with objective attributes and superindividual legal interests with basic attributes should be defined as the ecological environmental system legal interests with the objective of protecting individual legal interests. Furthermore, according to the characteristics of collective law interests and environmental law interests, we can determine the attribute of cumulative dangerous crime of environmental pollution crime, and then make clear "seriously polluted environment" as the object of defining cumulative dangerous function of partial destruction. The ternary characteristics of the possibility of universal implementation and the threat of individual legal benefits.
【作者单位】：东南大学法学院;
【基金】：江苏省高校“青蓝工程”学科带头人项目成果江苏区域法治发展协同创新中心研究项目成果
【分类号】：D924.36

【相似文献】