客观归责理论在医疗事故罪认定中的运用
发布时间：2018-12-27 14:22
【摘要】：医疗事故罪的认定一直是司法实践领域的重大课题之一。我国学者一直把注意义务作为医疗事故罪研究的主要内容。注意义务虽然能够解决过失犯的一些基本问题,但对于注意义务本身的界定不够明确,缺乏明确的认定标准,不能很好的解决医疗事故罪这一特殊过失犯罪的认定问题。相比注意义务,源自德国的客观归责理论拥有一套完整的归责判断体系,通过对不法行为、危害结果及其之间联系进行评价从而判断责任的归属,更加明确可行。既体现了注意义务的部分优秀内容,如信赖原则等,又较好的克服了注意义务判断标准模糊不清的缺点。实践中,将客观归责理论运用于医疗事故罪客观事实的认定,通过“制造不被允许制造危险—实现不被容许的危险—构成要件的效力范围”三段递进式的归责体系对医疗事故罪的实行行为进行判断,可以使医疗事故罪的司法认定变得更加科学、合理。
[Abstract]:The cognizance of medical malpractice crime is one of the important subjects in the judicial practice field all the time. Chinese scholars have always regarded the duty of care as the main content of the study of medical malpractice crime. Although the duty of care can solve some basic problems of negligent crime, the definition of duty of care itself is not clear enough and the standard of recognition is not clear, which can not solve the problem of identifying the crime of medical malpractice as a special negligent crime. Compared with the duty of care, the objective imputation theory derived from Germany has a set of complete imputation judgment system. It is more clear and feasible to judge the attribution of responsibility by evaluating the illegal act, the harmful result and the relationship between them. It not only embodies some excellent contents of duty of care, such as the principle of trust, but also overcomes the blur of judgment standard of duty of care. In practice, the objective imputation theory is applied to the determination of the objective facts of the medical malpractice crime. Through the three-paragraph progressive imputation system of "making dangerous not allowed-realizing the scope of effectiveness of impermissible Hazard", the author judges the practice of the crime of medical malpractice. It can make the judicial cognizance of medical malpractice crime more scientific and reasonable.
【学位授予单位】：南京师范大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2017
【分类号】：D924.3
本文编号：2393203
[Abstract]:The cognizance of medical malpractice crime is one of the important subjects in the judicial practice field all the time. Chinese scholars have always regarded the duty of care as the main content of the study of medical malpractice crime. Although the duty of care can solve some basic problems of negligent crime, the definition of duty of care itself is not clear enough and the standard of recognition is not clear, which can not solve the problem of identifying the crime of medical malpractice as a special negligent crime. Compared with the duty of care, the objective imputation theory derived from Germany has a set of complete imputation judgment system. It is more clear and feasible to judge the attribution of responsibility by evaluating the illegal act, the harmful result and the relationship between them. It not only embodies some excellent contents of duty of care, such as the principle of trust, but also overcomes the blur of judgment standard of duty of care. In practice, the objective imputation theory is applied to the determination of the objective facts of the medical malpractice crime. Through the three-paragraph progressive imputation system of "making dangerous not allowed-realizing the scope of effectiveness of impermissible Hazard", the author judges the practice of the crime of medical malpractice. It can make the judicial cognizance of medical malpractice crime more scientific and reasonable.
【学位授予单位】：南京师范大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2017
【分类号】：D924.3
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 郑珂;;论客观归责理论的理论定位[J];法制博览;2016年27期
2 周光权;;行为无价值论与客观归责理论[J];清华法学;2015年01期
3 李川;;从注意义务违反到客观归责:医疗过失犯之理论嬗变与归责限缩[J];法学论坛;2014年05期
4 周光权;;客观归责与过失犯论[J];政治与法律;2014年05期
5 陈璇;;论过失犯中注意义务的规范保护目的[J];清华法学;2014年01期
6 周光权;;客观归责方法论的中国实践[J];法学家;2013年06期
7 马卫军;;被害人自我答责与过失犯[J];法学家;2013年04期
8 张明楷;;也谈客观归责理论 兼与周光权、刘艳红教授商榷[J];中外法学;2013年02期
9 常潇;马冬梅;;客观归责理论的体系性定位与犯罪阶层理论[J];法制与社会;2013年09期
10 孙运梁;张誉馨;;刑法中客观归责理论规则体系研究[J];法制与社会发展;2013年02期
，本文编号：2393203
本文链接：https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/xingfalunwen/2393203.html
