数额犯未遂问题研究
发布时间:2018-12-29 14:16
【摘要】:数额犯未遂问题的核心是数额未遂犯的可罚性根据问题,它一方面取决于数额在该犯罪构成中的地位与作用,另一方面又取决于未遂犯的可罚性。据此,本文首先对刑法上“数额”的相关法条进行梳理,指出所谓的数额是指刑法规定的能以货币度量的经济价值或者财产利益的数值,它是犯罪构成中的整体性规范要素;而所谓的数额犯是指以法定数额作为犯罪成立条件的犯罪类型。其次,通过未遂犯的根据的研究,并结合“数额”的限定功能构建数额未遂犯的可罚性根据理论:作为数额未遂犯的可罚性基础是行为造成财产法益受侵犯的危险性,同时,它要求以“数额”为表现形式的行为危险性与行为人危险性来填充数额犯未遂行为的可罚性,使其充足成立犯罪的实质根据。最后,本文还对司法实践的问题加以检讨,得出以下结论:一是生产、销售伪劣产品未遂,情节严重的可以定罪处罚,,这其中的可罚性根据是以生产、销售行为造成伪劣产品流入市场的结果危险为基础,并以扩大的行为危险范围来填充因缺乏既遂危害结果的可罚性“漏洞”。二是盗窃未遂司法解释中“以数额巨大的财物为目标”是犯罪行为对象的数额,不是犯罪人主观意图的数额;同时,对于盗窃未遂犯的刑罚裁量应适用“数额较大”中的刑档。
[Abstract]:The core of the problem of attempted crime of amount is the question of the penalty basis of attempted crime of amount. On the one hand, it depends on the position and function of amount in the constitution of the crime, on the other hand, it depends on the penalization of attempted crime. Based on this, this paper firstly combs the relevant articles of the "amount" in the criminal law, and points out that the so-called amount refers to the value of the economic value or the property benefit which can be measured by money, which is the integral normative element in the constitution of the crime. The so-called amount of crime refers to the legal amount of crime as the conditions for the establishment of the type of crime. Secondly, through the research of the basis of attempted crime and combining with the limited function of "amount", the author constructs the theory of the penalty basis of the amount of attempted crime: as the foundation of the penalty of the amount of attempted crime, it is the danger of property law beneficial infringement caused by the act, at the same time, It requires "amount" as a form of behavior risk and the risk of the perpetrator to fill in the amount of attempted acts of punishment, so as to make it sufficient to establish the substantive basis of the crime. Finally, this paper also reviews the judicial practice, and draws the following conclusions: first, the attempted production and sale of fake and inferior products, if the circumstances are serious, can be convicted and punished, and the penalty is based on production. The sale behavior causes the perils of the counterfeit and inferior products to enter the market, and fills in the penalty "loophole" because of the lack of the accomplished harm result by expanding the range of the behavior risk. Second, in the judicial interpretation of attempted theft, "the object of the crime is the object of the crime with a large amount of property", not the amount of the criminal's subjective intention; at the same time, the penalty discretion of the attempted burglary should be applied to the criminal file of the "large amount".
【学位授予单位】:华南理工大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2014
【分类号】:D924.11
本文编号:2394938
[Abstract]:The core of the problem of attempted crime of amount is the question of the penalty basis of attempted crime of amount. On the one hand, it depends on the position and function of amount in the constitution of the crime, on the other hand, it depends on the penalization of attempted crime. Based on this, this paper firstly combs the relevant articles of the "amount" in the criminal law, and points out that the so-called amount refers to the value of the economic value or the property benefit which can be measured by money, which is the integral normative element in the constitution of the crime. The so-called amount of crime refers to the legal amount of crime as the conditions for the establishment of the type of crime. Secondly, through the research of the basis of attempted crime and combining with the limited function of "amount", the author constructs the theory of the penalty basis of the amount of attempted crime: as the foundation of the penalty of the amount of attempted crime, it is the danger of property law beneficial infringement caused by the act, at the same time, It requires "amount" as a form of behavior risk and the risk of the perpetrator to fill in the amount of attempted acts of punishment, so as to make it sufficient to establish the substantive basis of the crime. Finally, this paper also reviews the judicial practice, and draws the following conclusions: first, the attempted production and sale of fake and inferior products, if the circumstances are serious, can be convicted and punished, and the penalty is based on production. The sale behavior causes the perils of the counterfeit and inferior products to enter the market, and fills in the penalty "loophole" because of the lack of the accomplished harm result by expanding the range of the behavior risk. Second, in the judicial interpretation of attempted theft, "the object of the crime is the object of the crime with a large amount of property", not the amount of the criminal's subjective intention; at the same time, the penalty discretion of the attempted burglary should be applied to the criminal file of the "large amount".
【学位授予单位】:华南理工大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2014
【分类号】:D924.11
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 刘之雄;数额犯若干问题新探[J];法商研究;2005年06期
2 陈洪兵;从我国犯罪概念的定量性探析犯罪未遂问题——兼谈知识产权犯罪未遂形态[J];贵州警官职业学院学报;2002年03期
3 涂龙科;;犯罪论中数额的地位[J];法律科学(西北政法大学学报);2012年04期
4 张永江;;论未遂犯的处罚根据[J];河北法学;2006年10期
5 童伟华;数额犯若干问题研究[J];华侨大学学报(人文社会科学版);2001年04期
6 储槐植,汪永乐;再论我国刑法中犯罪概念的定量因素[J];法学研究;2000年02期
7 王世洲;现代刑罚目的理论与中国的选择[J];法学研究;2003年03期
8 游伟,陆建红;人身危险性在我国刑法中的功能定位[J];法学研究;2004年04期
9 陈璇;;客观的未遂犯处罚根据论之提倡[J];法学研究;2011年02期
10 王莹;;情节犯之情节的犯罪论体系性定位[J];法学研究;2012年03期
本文编号:2394938
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/xingfalunwen/2394938.html