论积极一般预防的理论构造及其正当性质疑
发布时间：2018-12-29 16:51
【摘要】：积极一般预防理论着力法律忠诚意识的培养,强调规范有效性的确证,申彰秩序信赖的稳定预期,致力社会同一性的维系,力图通过刑法规范的明文宣示和刑罚适用的惩罚教育,导引守法善行,贬抑违规恶径,实现规范认同。然而,积极一般预防以刑罚的强制惩戒作为教育公众遵循刑法,学习守法善行的手段,又不可能彻底撇离威慑,陷入威慑与认同的正当性纷扰之中;积极一般预防以法忠诚意识的训练为内容,而未能触及规范本身的善恶性质甄别,陷入忠诚恶法的正当性危机;积极一般预防凸显刑罚惩戒对公众规范意识的唤醒,抨击威慑刑对人的工具利用,无从实质改变积极一般预防将人作为预防公众犯罪的工具性效用,陷入工具正当性的困境之中。因此,刑法的知识转型需要对积极一般预防理论保持应有的警醒与反思。
[Abstract]:The positive general theory of prevention focuses on the cultivation of legal loyalty consciousness, emphasizing the confirmation of the validity of norms, the stable expectation of confidence in order, and the maintenance of social identity. Through the explicit declaration of the criminal law norms and the punishment education applicable to the penalty, the author tries to guide the law-abiding good deeds, detracts the illegal ways, and realizes the normative identity. However, the positive general prevention takes the compulsory punishment of punishment as a means to educate the public to follow the criminal law and learn to obey the law and do good deeds, and it is impossible to completely turn away from deterrence and fall into the legitimacy of deterrence and identity. Positive general prevention takes the training of legal loyalty consciousness as the content, but fails to touch the good and evil nature of the norm itself, and falls into the legitimacy crisis of loyalty and evil law. Positive general prevention highlights the awakening of punishment and punishment to public awareness of norms, criticizes the use of human tools by deterrent punishment, and does not change the utility of active general prevention as a tool to prevent public crime. Caught in the dilemma of tool legitimacy. Therefore, the knowledge transformation of criminal law needs to maintain due vigilance and reflection on positive general prevention theory.
【作者单位】： 重庆邮电大学网络空间安全与信息法学院;
【基金】：2016年国家社科基金青年项目“刑法渊源中的立法科学化基本问题研究”(项目号16CFX025)的阶段性研究成果
【分类号】：D914
本文编号：2395091
[Abstract]:The positive general theory of prevention focuses on the cultivation of legal loyalty consciousness, emphasizing the confirmation of the validity of norms, the stable expectation of confidence in order, and the maintenance of social identity. Through the explicit declaration of the criminal law norms and the punishment education applicable to the penalty, the author tries to guide the law-abiding good deeds, detracts the illegal ways, and realizes the normative identity. However, the positive general prevention takes the compulsory punishment of punishment as a means to educate the public to follow the criminal law and learn to obey the law and do good deeds, and it is impossible to completely turn away from deterrence and fall into the legitimacy of deterrence and identity. Positive general prevention takes the training of legal loyalty consciousness as the content, but fails to touch the good and evil nature of the norm itself, and falls into the legitimacy crisis of loyalty and evil law. Positive general prevention highlights the awakening of punishment and punishment to public awareness of norms, criticizes the use of human tools by deterrent punishment, and does not change the utility of active general prevention as a tool to prevent public crime. Caught in the dilemma of tool legitimacy. Therefore, the knowledge transformation of criminal law needs to maintain due vigilance and reflection on positive general prevention theory.
【作者单位】： 重庆邮电大学网络空间安全与信息法学院;
【基金】：2016年国家社科基金青年项目“刑法渊源中的立法科学化基本问题研究”(项目号16CFX025)的阶段性研究成果
【分类号】：D914
【相似文献】
中国期刊全文数据库 前10条
1 邱兴隆;从一元到多元:一般预防论的流变[J];法学评论;2000年05期
2 陈兴良;一般预防的观念转变[J];中国法学;2000年05期
3 邱兴隆;一般预防论的价值分析[J];法学论坛;2000年04期
4 邱兴隆;论一般预防的正当性──兼与否定论者商榷[J];中国法学;2001年04期
5 王宏玉;规诫的力量——谈刑罚之一般预防[J];中国人民公安大学学报;2004年01期
6 李卫红;;对一般预防的否定论证[J];中国青年政治学院学报;2010年05期
7 韩友谊;积极的一般预防[J];河北法学;2005年02期
8 陆诗忠;;论一般预防的合目的性[J];河南师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版);2008年01期
9 周少华;;作为目的的一般预防[J];法学研究;2008年02期
10 韩轶;对刑罚一般预防的再认识[J];法学评论;2000年06期
，本文编号：2395091
本文链接：https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/xingfalunwen/2395091.html
