当前位置:主页 > 法律论文 > 刑法论文 >

生产、销售假药罪法益侵害的规范解释——主次法益价值冲突时的实质判断

发布时间:2019-01-14 08:31
【摘要】:在民生刑法观指导下,为加强对民众生命健康安全保护,《刑法修正案(八)》将我国1997年《刑法》第141条规定的生产、销售假药罪由危险犯改为行为犯,对制售假药行为加大了打击力度。生产销售假药罪旨在保护多重法益,法益保护有主次之分,主次法益发生价值冲突时,应以保护主要法益为原则。刑法规范层面上,公民生命健康法益的保护处于优势地位,秩序的维护则处于从属地位,其目的在于更好地保障个人法益。对于假药的认定应根据药品是否具有真实疗效进行实质认定而不能仅从形式上看是否取得药品管理部门批号。在陆勇案中,陆勇代购药品行为不具有法益侵害性,欠缺相关犯罪构成要件的违法性要素,不应作为犯罪处理。
[Abstract]:Under the guidance of the people's livelihood criminal law, in order to strengthen the protection of the people's health and safety, the "Criminal Law Amendment (8)" changed the production stipulated in Article 141 of the 1997 Criminal Law, and the crime of selling counterfeit drugs was changed from a dangerous crime to an act crime. The production and sale of counterfeit drugs increased the crackdown. The crime of producing and selling counterfeit drugs is aimed at protecting multiple legal interests, which are divided into primary and secondary ones. When the primary and secondary legal interests conflict of value, the principle of protecting the main legal interests should be taken as the principle. In the aspect of criminal law, the protection of citizens' life and health interests is in an advantageous position, while the maintenance of order is in a subordinate position, the purpose of which is to better protect individual legal interests. The identification of counterfeit medicine should be based on whether the drug has true curative effect or not, but not only from the form of whether to obtain the drug administration department batch number. In the case of Lu Yong, the behavior of purchasing drugs on behalf of Lu Yong does not have the infringement of legal interests and lacks the illegal elements of the constitutive elements of the relevant crimes, so it should not be treated as a crime.
【作者单位】: 南京大学法学院;
【基金】:江苏省法学会课题“经济犯罪中的被害人研究”(项目编号:SFH2014C14)的阶段性成果
【分类号】:D924.3

【参考文献】

相关期刊论文 前4条

1 卢建平;;加强对民生的刑法保护——民生刑法之提倡[J];法学杂志;2010年12期

2 何荣功;;经济自由与经济刑法正当性的体系思考[J];法学评论;2014年06期

3 张勇;;民生刑法的品格:兼评《刑法修正案(八)》[J];河北法学;2011年06期

4 何荣功;;要慎重对待“民生刑法观”[J];中国检察官;2014年03期

【共引文献】

相关期刊论文 前10条

1 刘大元;挪用公款罪共犯研究[J];安徽教育学院学报;2003年05期

2 董玉庭;黄大威;;论聚众淫乱罪的刑事立法——以无被害人犯罪为研究视角[J];北方论丛;2012年03期

3 蒋t,

本文编号:2408519


资料下载
论文发表

本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/xingfalunwen/2408519.html


Copyright(c)文论论文网All Rights Reserved | 网站地图 |

版权申明:资料由用户f5746***提供,本站仅收录摘要或目录,作者需要删除请E-mail邮箱bigeng88@qq.com