论刑事裁判规则合理性的实现路径
发布时间:2019-02-12 16:51
【摘要】:在我国刑事司法实践中,"依规则"与"保公正"这两个应当具有一致性的价值目标之间会出现相互冲突的情形。司法机关如果严格按照刑事裁判规则进行司法判断,就可能产生不符合国民"三常"观念的结论,因而难以说是实现了公正;但如果追求"三常"观念之符合,确保裁判结论的公正性,则司法机关就不得不突破或者不遵守既有的裁判规则。这种现象的存在,很大程度上在于刑事裁判规则本身设定的不合理,规则设定过分强调对司法裁量权的限制,而忽视了前提性的公正考量。
[Abstract]:In the practice of criminal justice in our country, there will be conflicts between "according to rules" and "protecting justice", which should have consistent value goals. If the judicial organ carries on the judicial judgment strictly according to the criminal adjudication rule, may produce the conclusion which does not accord with the national "three ordinary" concept, therefore is difficult to say has realized the justice; However, if we pursue the consistency of the "three ordinary" concept and ensure the impartiality of the judicial conclusion, then the judiciary will have to break through or not abide by the existing rules of adjudication. To a large extent, the existence of this phenomenon lies in the unreasonable setting of criminal adjudication rules, which emphasize the limitation of judicial discretion and neglect the presupposition of justice.
【作者单位】: 吉林大学法学院;
【基金】:国家社会科学基金重点项目(13AFX009)
【分类号】:D924.3
本文编号:2420602
[Abstract]:In the practice of criminal justice in our country, there will be conflicts between "according to rules" and "protecting justice", which should have consistent value goals. If the judicial organ carries on the judicial judgment strictly according to the criminal adjudication rule, may produce the conclusion which does not accord with the national "three ordinary" concept, therefore is difficult to say has realized the justice; However, if we pursue the consistency of the "three ordinary" concept and ensure the impartiality of the judicial conclusion, then the judiciary will have to break through or not abide by the existing rules of adjudication. To a large extent, the existence of this phenomenon lies in the unreasonable setting of criminal adjudication rules, which emphasize the limitation of judicial discretion and neglect the presupposition of justice.
【作者单位】: 吉林大学法学院;
【基金】:国家社会科学基金重点项目(13AFX009)
【分类号】:D924.3
【相似文献】
相关期刊论文 前6条
1 任彦君;;论利益衡量方法在我国刑事裁判中的运用[J];法学评论;2013年05期
2 刘流;;刑事裁判中的演绎推论[J];中国刑事法杂志;2008年03期
3 杨志国;;刑事裁判模式的反思与重构——以定罪为中心的研究[J];刑事法评论;2013年01期
4 阴建峰;;刑事裁判的刑法社会学解读——以许霆案为视角[J];刑法论丛;2009年02期
5 陈福民;唐震;;刑事裁判中有关财产内容的执行问题探析[J];政治与法律;2006年05期
6 ;[J];;年期
相关博士学位论文 前1条
1 曲晟;刑事裁判的不确定性现象研究[D];吉林大学;2012年
相关硕士学位论文 前2条
1 陈为峰;刑法变更与刑事裁判既判力[D];厦门大学;2007年
2 伊传锋;刑法适用中的推理研究[D];西南政法大学;2008年
,本文编号:2420602
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/xingfalunwen/2420602.html