量刑规范化改革困境及破解
发布时间：2019-02-13 09:45
【摘要】：我国量刑规范化改革始终面临着量刑指导意见作用力、法官自由裁量权定位以及量刑方法融合等三大难题。改革中面临的上述难题,其根本原因在于理论界和实务界对量刑规范化的概念及其内涵未达成统一认识。在改革中,必须反映量刑本质属性,重点规范法官自由裁量权,以达到量刑相对均衡之目标。因此,应采取制定指导性的量刑规则、构建多元化的量刑程序模式、建立传统经验与现代方法相融合的量刑方法等途径实现量刑规范化。
[Abstract]:The reform of sentencing standardization in our country has always faced three major problems: the exertion of sentencing guidance, the positioning of judges' discretion and the integration of sentencing methods. The fundamental reason for the above problems in the reform lies in the lack of a unified understanding of the concept and connotation of the standardization of sentencing in the theoretical and practical circles. In the reform, the essential attribute of sentencing must be reflected, and the discretion of judges should be regulated in order to achieve the goal of relative balance of sentencing. Therefore, it is necessary to establish guiding sentencing rules, build a diversified sentencing procedure model, and establish a combination of traditional experience and modern sentencing methods to achieve sentencing standardization.
【作者单位】： 西南政法大学法学院;
【分类号】：D924.13
本文编号：2421415
[Abstract]:The reform of sentencing standardization in our country has always faced three major problems: the exertion of sentencing guidance, the positioning of judges' discretion and the integration of sentencing methods. The fundamental reason for the above problems in the reform lies in the lack of a unified understanding of the concept and connotation of the standardization of sentencing in the theoretical and practical circles. In the reform, the essential attribute of sentencing must be reflected, and the discretion of judges should be regulated in order to achieve the goal of relative balance of sentencing. Therefore, it is necessary to establish guiding sentencing rules, build a diversified sentencing procedure model, and establish a combination of traditional experience and modern sentencing methods to achieve sentencing standardization.
【作者单位】： 西南政法大学法学院;
【分类号】：D924.13
【相似文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 厉荣媛;;中国法官自由裁量权问题的思考——从刑事审判角度看中国相关制度与现实[J];法制与社会;2007年09期
2 王一超;;试论量刑规范化中法官自由裁量权的行使[J];法制与社会;2011年14期
3 何正华;陈景敏;;渎职犯罪量刑畸轻的原因及其防治——兼论对法官自由裁量权的合理控制[J];法治论坛;2007年04期
4 董林涛;;论量刑程序中的法官自由裁量权[J];湖南警察学院学报;2011年05期
5 赵静;;关于量刑指导意见的几点思考[J];商业文化(上半月);2011年11期
6 汤建国;;科学规范法官自由裁量权 探索和完善量刑均衡方法[J];武汉公安干部学院学报;2009年03期
7 朱淼;;刑事法官自由裁量权的行使[J];人民论坛;2014年14期
8 张达鸣;刑法对法官自由裁量权的限定[J];检察实践;1999年03期
9 康均心;王敏敏;;刑事立法模糊性基础问题研究[J];北方法学;2009年02期
10 柳忠卫;葛进;;量刑基准的存在根据与形式——兼论法官量刑基准意识的养成[J];河南公安高等专科学校学报;2006年05期
相关硕士学位论文 前2条
1 杜志红;论定罪中的法官自由裁量权[D];西南政法大学;2006年
2 金光南;“涉黑”案的量刑均衡研究[D];西南政法大学;2011年
，本文编号：2421415
本文链接：https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/xingfalunwen/2421415.html
