当前位置:主页 > 法律论文 > 刑法论文 >

论盗窃罪犯罪对象的司法扩张

发布时间:2019-02-13 16:41
【摘要】:随着经济社会的发展,财产的表现形式由单一变复杂,关于盗窃罪的犯罪对象,在司法实践呈现扩张趋势,盗窃罪犯罪对象的边界变得模糊不清、充满争议。在传统理论无法给出合理解释,新的理论无法形成统一的共识的情况下,本文以司法扩张为视角,对盗窃罪的对象进行研究。本文以盗窃罪犯罪对象的司法扩张为主线,明确司法扩张的概念叙述司法扩张的现状,进一步说明司法扩张的可行性,认可司法扩张现象存在的积极意义。本文通过结合司法实践法院裁判不动产、财产性利益以及虚拟财产能够成为盗窃罪的犯罪对象并且对典型形态加以理论分析。本文在肯定盗窃罪犯罪对象司法扩张的价值的同时也建议完善盗窃罪犯罪对象的立法,在相关立法空白期间,我们可以通过加强司法解释以及司法判例的指导,更好的处理司法扩张的局面。同时,本文认为盗窃罪保护的对象与民法的财产权范畴是一样的,即包括物权和债权。不动产、虚拟财产和财产性利益属于财产权的范畴,因此可以成为盗窃罪的犯罪对象。本文以盗窃罪犯罪对象的司法扩张为视角展开论述为了回应司法实践的需要,促进立法完善,有效保护群众的财产权。本文分为四部分: 第一部分,主要介绍盗窃罪犯罪对象的基础理论,盗窃罪对象的“财物”概念的民刑接轨,通过法律的系统性刑法的概念在没有明确的规定下可以参照民法,刑法章名的指导作用以及刑法的谦抑性,认为财物的范畴与民法的财产权的一样即包括物权和债权。对盗窃罪对象的“财物”边界进行划分是为了文章下面具有债权内涵的财产性利益以及不动产、虚拟财产作为物权可以成为盗窃罪的对象的理论基础。在司法实践中为了更准确的辨别被盗物品是否属于盗窃罪的对象就需要分析盗窃罪对象的基本属性,即经济属性、物理属性和法律属性。盗窃罪是财产犯罪,经济属性是盗窃罪对象的第一属于,经济的发展,财产的形式的多样性使得具有主观价值的财物也可以成为盗窃罪的对象。因此,认为只要具有价值就可以成为盗窃罪的对象,既包含具有主观价值也包含具有客观价值。 第二部分,司法扩张是指司法裁判呈现的是不断扩大法律条文所规制的范围的现象,最常见的表现就是对立法规定不具体,抽象性明显的进行扩张。不同地方不同级别的法院都存在司法扩张的现象。在司法实践中裁判不动产、财产性利益以及虚拟财产可以成为盗窃罪的对象的案例的存在,说明司法扩张的一个现状。进而引申由于侵害不动产、财产性利益、虚拟财产等新型财产的违法行为的猖狂以及法律保护的不足催生司法扩张。我们承认司法扩张的存在,并且相信司法扩张具有一定的积极意义,司法扩张的意义在于能动司法的积极表现,刑法合理扩张解释的积极表现,弥补立法不足,利于最大限度地实现个案正义,积累立法和司法经验。 第三部分,在对盗窃罪对象司法扩张进行理论分析后,该部分主要分析司法实践中不动产、财产性利益以及虚拟财产能够成为盗窃罪对象理由。盗窃罪对象“财物”概念与民法上“物”的概念范畴一致包括不动产,现有法律没有明确规定不动产不属于盗窃罪对象,应对盗窃罪对象做扩大解释,不动产可以成为盗窃罪的对象。财产性利益的内涵是与债权相呼应的概念,债权也是财产权的范围,所以财产性利益可以成为盗窃罪的对象。盗窃罪的对象需要具有价值属性、物理属性和法律属性,通过对虚拟财产的属性与财物的一般特性等进行比较,认为虚拟财产完全可以成为盗窃罪的犯罪对象。 第四部分,针对盗窃罪犯罪对象的司法扩张的局面,为了满足司法实践的需求,我们建议关于盗窃罪的对象立法的明确化和体系化。立法上借鉴国外的立法经验对盗窃罪设立专章,关于盗窃罪的对象做出详细的规定。但是,立法是耗时较长的一个程序,应对新案例、新变化的直接的方法就是加强盗窃罪对象的司法解释工作和加强盗窃罪对象判例指导。
[Abstract]:With the development of the economy and society, the form of the property is complicated by a single change, the crime object of the crime of larceny, the tendency of the expansion in the judicial practice, the boundary of the crime object of the larceny is blurred, and the dispute is full of controversy. In the absence of a reasonable explanation in the traditional theory, the new theory cannot form a unified consensus. In this paper, the object of the crime of larceny is studied in the view of judicial expansion. In this paper, the judicial extension of the crime object of larceny is the main line, the concept of the judicial expansion is defined, the present situation of the judicial expansion is described, the feasibility of the judicial expansion is further explained, and the positive significance of the phenomenon of judicial expansion is recognized. In this paper, through the combination of the judicial practice, the real property, the property interest and the virtual property of the court can become the crime object of the larceny, and the typical form is analyzed. In the light of the value of the criminal object's judicial expansion, the article also suggests that the legislation of the crime object of larceny should be perfected. During the blank of the relevant legislation, we can better deal with the situation of judicial expansion by strengthening the judicial interpretation and the guidance of the judicial precedent. At the same time, the article thinks that the object of the crime protection is the same as the property right category of the civil law, that is, the property right and the creditor's right. Real property, virtual property and property interest belong to the category of property right, so it can be the crime object of larceny. This paper, based on the judicial expansion of the crime object of larceny, discusses in order to respond to the need of judicial practice, to promote the perfection of the legislation and to effectively protect the property rights of the masses. This paper is divided into four parts: The first part mainly introduces the basic theory of the crime object of the larceny, the combination of the principle of the object of the theft and the people's punishment, and the concept of the systematic criminal law through the law can be referred to the people in the absence of clear rules. The guiding function of the name of the criminal law and the restraint of the criminal law, the scope of the property is the same as the property right of the civil law, that is, the real right and the debt Right. The 鈥減roperty鈥,

本文编号:2421743

资料下载
论文发表

本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/xingfalunwen/2421743.html


Copyright(c)文论论文网All Rights Reserved | 网站地图 |

版权申明:资料由用户40756***提供,本站仅收录摘要或目录,作者需要删除请E-mail邮箱bigeng88@qq.com