浅析聚众斗殴罪的转化
发布时间：2019-02-16 17:22
【摘要】：聚众斗殴罪是一种案发率较高的群体性犯罪,不但严重侵犯社会正常的管理秩序,且由于该罪具有群体性、暴力性等特征,常常导致重伤、死亡等严重危害后果的发生。由于现行法律条文对于聚众斗殴过程中出现重伤、死亡结果时应当如何处理的相关规定过于简化,致使刑法理论界和司法实务界对该条文的解读和对聚众斗殴罪的转化定罪出现了不同的理解,继而对聚众斗殴转化犯罪如何认定的问题出现严重的分歧意见,也导致了在具体处理聚众斗殴犯罪案件时,出现同类案件不同判决的现象。因此,正确认识这些分歧意见以及合理把握聚众斗殴罪的转化犯罪问题成了司法实践亟待解决的问题。本文以司法实务中的一件真实案件为例,依据法律规定和相关刑法理论,结合对案件审理意见的辨析,对案件的相关争议问题进行了归纳总结,并进行理论探讨。本文分为五个部分。第一部分,案情介绍。本部分引入司法实务真实案件,对杨一凡涉嫌聚众斗殴罪一案进行了简要的概括,通过对案件审理过程中不同意见的阐述,引出案件处理的争议焦点问题:在聚众斗殴过程中出现死亡结果的,对行为人是否一律按照故意杀人罪进行转化定罪?是否应将所有构成聚众斗殴罪的行为人全部进行转化定罪?第二部分,对聚众斗殴罪的转化问题进行法理分析。本部分着眼于对刑法第二百九十二条第二款之规定是法律拟制还是注意规定进行判断。通过分析,笔者认为该款规定系注意规定而非法律拟制,因此在对聚众斗殴罪进行转化定罪时必须严格遵循主客观相一致的原则,按照犯罪构成要件对行为人进行主观到客观、形式到实质的评价和判断。第三部分,对聚众斗殴罪的转化条件进行分析阐述。本部分先对刑法理论界关于转化犯罪的“主观条件说”、“客观条件说”、“主客观共同条件说”三种理论进行分析,进而对聚众斗殴罪转化犯罪的主观犯意内容、认识因素与意志因素、基础条件、超出行为和犯罪结果等方面进行阐述,从主观方面到客观方面对聚众斗殴罪的转化定罪条件进行界定。第四部分,对聚众斗殴转化犯罪的主体进行分析。本部分主要根据聚众斗殴犯罪的主体(首要分子和积极参加者)参与聚众斗殴过程的几种情况进行阐述,从犯意的内容、客观行为等方面进行综合评判,以此界定首要分子与积极参加者在不同情况下的转化定罪问题。第五部分,结论:在对聚众斗殴罪进行转化定罪的过程中,要坚持责任主义的立场,从犯罪构成要件的角度出发,坚持主客观相统一的定罪原则。
[Abstract]:The crime of affray is a group crime with high incidence rate, which not only seriously infringes the normal management order of the society, but also often results in serious harm such as serious injury and death due to its collective and violent characteristics. As the existing provisions of the law on serious injuries occurred in the course of affray, the relevant provisions on how to deal with the consequences of death are too simplified. As a result, the interpretation of the article and the transformation and conviction of the crime of affray appear different understandings in the criminal law theory and judicial practice, and then there are serious differences of views on how to identify the crime of affray and affray. It also leads to the phenomenon of different judgments in similar cases when dealing with the crime of affray. Therefore, the correct understanding of these divergent views and reasonable grasp of the crime of affray transformation of crime has become a problem to be solved in judicial practice. This article takes a real case in judicial practice as an example, according to the law stipulation and relevant criminal law theory, unifies to the case trial opinion discrimination, has carried on the summary to the case correlation dispute question, and carries on the theory discussion. This paper is divided into five parts. Part I, introduction of the case. This part introduces the judicial practice of real cases, Yang Yifan suspected of the crime of affray a brief summary of the case, through the trial process of different views on the elaboration, Lead to the focus of the dispute in the case: in the fight in the process of death, the perpetrators of all according to the crime of intentional homicide conviction? Should all perpetrators who constitute the crime of affray be transformed into convictions? The second part is the legal analysis of the transformation of affray crime. This part focuses on judging whether the provisions of Section 2 of Article 292 of the Criminal Law are statutory or attentive. According to the analysis, the author thinks that the provisions of this section should be paid attention to, but not the legal fiction. Therefore, when the crime of affray is transformed and convicted, the principle of consistent subjectivity and objectivity must be strictly followed, and the perpetrator should be subjectively to objectively according to the constitutive elements of the crime. Evaluation and judgment from form to substance. In the third part, the transformation conditions of affray crime are analyzed and expounded. This part first analyzes the three theories of "subjective condition", "objective condition theory" and "subjective and objective common condition theory" about transforming crime in the theoretical circle of criminal law, and then makes an analysis of the subjective criminal intent of the crime of affray. Cognitive factors and will factors, basic conditions, beyond the behavior and the result of the crime are expounded, from subjective to objective aspects of the crime of affray transformation and conviction conditions are defined. In the fourth part, the author analyzes the main body of the crime of affray. This part is mainly based on the main body (ringleaders and active participants) involved in the affray process of several situations to elaborate, from the content of criminal intent, objective behavior and other aspects of comprehensive evaluation, This defines the conversion of ringleaders and active participants in different situations. The fifth part, conclusion: in the process of transforming the crime of affray into conviction, we should adhere to the position of responsibility doctrine, and adhere to the principle of unified subjective and objective conviction from the point of view of the constitutive elements of the crime.
【学位授予单位】：西南政法大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2014
【分类号】：D924.3
本文编号：2424671
[Abstract]:The crime of affray is a group crime with high incidence rate, which not only seriously infringes the normal management order of the society, but also often results in serious harm such as serious injury and death due to its collective and violent characteristics. As the existing provisions of the law on serious injuries occurred in the course of affray, the relevant provisions on how to deal with the consequences of death are too simplified. As a result, the interpretation of the article and the transformation and conviction of the crime of affray appear different understandings in the criminal law theory and judicial practice, and then there are serious differences of views on how to identify the crime of affray and affray. It also leads to the phenomenon of different judgments in similar cases when dealing with the crime of affray. Therefore, the correct understanding of these divergent views and reasonable grasp of the crime of affray transformation of crime has become a problem to be solved in judicial practice. This article takes a real case in judicial practice as an example, according to the law stipulation and relevant criminal law theory, unifies to the case trial opinion discrimination, has carried on the summary to the case correlation dispute question, and carries on the theory discussion. This paper is divided into five parts. Part I, introduction of the case. This part introduces the judicial practice of real cases, Yang Yifan suspected of the crime of affray a brief summary of the case, through the trial process of different views on the elaboration, Lead to the focus of the dispute in the case: in the fight in the process of death, the perpetrators of all according to the crime of intentional homicide conviction? Should all perpetrators who constitute the crime of affray be transformed into convictions? The second part is the legal analysis of the transformation of affray crime. This part focuses on judging whether the provisions of Section 2 of Article 292 of the Criminal Law are statutory or attentive. According to the analysis, the author thinks that the provisions of this section should be paid attention to, but not the legal fiction. Therefore, when the crime of affray is transformed and convicted, the principle of consistent subjectivity and objectivity must be strictly followed, and the perpetrator should be subjectively to objectively according to the constitutive elements of the crime. Evaluation and judgment from form to substance. In the third part, the transformation conditions of affray crime are analyzed and expounded. This part first analyzes the three theories of "subjective condition", "objective condition theory" and "subjective and objective common condition theory" about transforming crime in the theoretical circle of criminal law, and then makes an analysis of the subjective criminal intent of the crime of affray. Cognitive factors and will factors, basic conditions, beyond the behavior and the result of the crime are expounded, from subjective to objective aspects of the crime of affray transformation and conviction conditions are defined. In the fourth part, the author analyzes the main body of the crime of affray. This part is mainly based on the main body (ringleaders and active participants) involved in the affray process of several situations to elaborate, from the content of criminal intent, objective behavior and other aspects of comprehensive evaluation, This defines the conversion of ringleaders and active participants in different situations. The fifth part, conclusion: in the process of transforming the crime of affray into conviction, we should adhere to the position of responsibility doctrine, and adhere to the principle of unified subjective and objective conviction from the point of view of the constitutive elements of the crime.
【学位授予单位】：西南政法大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2014
【分类号】：D924.3
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 李雪菁;;转化犯的概念与主要特征[J];黑河学刊;2014年03期
2 董绍静;;聚众斗殴罪的转化主体范围[J];法制与社会;2014年04期
3 张和林;邵栋豪;;案名:周某某、金某某故意杀人罪案 主题:聚众斗殴罪转化犯中转化主体范围的界定[J];中国检察官;2013年20期
4 陈琛;;论聚众斗殴罪的认定与转化[J];长春理工大学学报(社会科学版);2013年06期
5 王子悦;刘强;;聚众斗殴转化犯罪中犯意限制的司法认定[J];中国检察官;2013年08期
6 宫小汀;吴仕春;;聚众斗殴致人伤亡的转化定性分析[J];人民司法;2011年18期
7 刘涛;;拟制型的故意杀人罪,故意伤害罪——兼议我国刑法分则中的法律拟制与注意规定[J];湖南警察学院学报;2011年02期
8 刘敏;陈兟;;聚众斗殴中实行过限及其刑事责任的认定[J];中国检察官;2010年18期
9 张明楷;;寻衅滋事罪探究(上篇)[J];政治与法律;2008年01期
10 孙国祥,魏昌东;试析聚众斗殴罪中的转化犯[J];法学;2002年11期
相关重要报纸文章 前1条
1 张明楷;;如何区分注意规定与法律拟制[N];人民法院报;2006年
相关硕士学位论文 前1条
1 姜莹莹;聚众斗殴致人重伤、死亡若干问题研究[D];南京师范大学;2013年
，本文编号：2424671
本文链接：https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/xingfalunwen/2424671.html
