关于盗窃罪的理解和适用
发布时间：2019-02-22 13:49
【摘要】：《刑法修正案(八)》新增入户盗窃、携带凶器盗窃、扒窃三种特殊的盗窃行为类型,使盗窃罪的罪状上升为五种形式,且五种盗窃行为方式相互并列、相互独立。修正案自2011年5月1日实施以来,在保护人民财产安全、人身安全和维护社会公共秩序方面发挥了重要作用,但是关于如何正确理解和适用修正案下的盗窃罪尚存在一些冲突。为了在司法实践中更好的理解和适用修正案下的盗窃罪,文章拟对盗窃罪行为类型中的“多次盗窃”、“入户盗窃”、“携带凶器盗窃”以及“扒窃”等相关类型进行解读,并对如何正确适用修正案下的盗窃罪提出自己的见解。 本文分为引言、正文、结语三大部分。 引言部分通过扒窃1.5元被判刑的案例引出本文所要讨论的主题,简述新旧法律对扒窃行为的不同规定；简要说明新增盗窃行为形式的社会危害性以及入罪原因,浅析司法实务中一刀切入罪标准的不合理性,并明确指出本文的主题：关于盗窃罪的理解和适用。 正文共有四章： 第一章,探讨多次盗窃行为的认定。首先介绍新旧司法解释对“多次”的认定；其次分析如何界定“次”数,进而讨论成立多次盗窃是否有数额标准,以及是否每次都要求达到既遂；最后分析多次盗窃与行政处罚的衔接性。 第二章,探讨入户盗窃行为。首先陈述入户盗窃单独入罪的理由；其次分析“入户”这一动态的词语；接着提出对“户”的界定,尤其是特殊场合下对“户”的界定；最后探讨入户盗窃何时成立既遂。 第三章,探讨携带凶器盗窃行为。首先对携带凶器盗窃入罪作合理性分析；进而探讨携带凶器盗窃和携带凶器抢劫的区别；接着详细解析“携带”和“凶器”二词；然后针对司法实践中的几点困惑作出探讨；最后提到携带凶器盗窃的既遂情形。 第四章,探讨扒窃行为。本章是本文的重点章节。首先陈述扒窃行为入罪的合理性；接着又从反面陈述扒窃入罪带来的困扰；然后探析如何正确界定扒窃行为,其中涉及扒窃行为的基本要素,公共场所和贴身行窃；接着分析扒窃行为何时成立既遂；最后探析扒窃入罪的司法认定,并指出扒窃入罪的立法完善。 结语部分,归纳文章内容,阐明强调写作目的。
[Abstract]:The Criminal Law Amendment (8) > adds three special types of larceny: burglary, burglary with murder weapon and pickpocketing, which makes the crime of larceny rise to five forms, and the five ways of larceny are juxtaposed and independent of each other. Since its implementation on May 1, 2011, the Amendment has played an important role in protecting the safety of people's property, personal safety and maintaining public order, but there are still some conflicts on how to correctly understand and apply the crime of theft under the Amendment. In order to better understand and apply the crime of larceny under the amendment in judicial practice, the article intends to interpret the related types of larceny, such as "multiple theft", "burglary", "burglary with murder weapon" and "pickpocketing". And how to correctly apply the crime of theft under the amendment to put forward their own views. This paper is divided into three parts: introduction, text and conclusion. In the foreword part, the theme of this paper is drawn from the case that pickpocketing is sentenced by 1.5 yuan, and the different provisions of the new and old laws on pickpocketing behavior are briefly described. This paper briefly explains the social harmfulness of the new form of theft and the reasons for its incrimination, analyzes on the irrationality of the standard of one-size-fits-all in judicial practice, and points out clearly the theme of this article: the understanding and application of the crime of larceny. There are four chapters in the text: the first chapter discusses the identification of multiple theft. Firstly, it introduces the recognition of "many times" in the new and old judicial interpretations, secondly, analyzes how to define the number of "times", and then discusses whether there is a standard of amount for the establishment of multiple thefts, and whether it is required to achieve completion every time. Finally, it analyzes the connection between multiple theft and administrative punishment. Chapter two discusses burglary. Firstly, it states the reasons for the individual crime of burglary; secondly, it analyzes the dynamic words of "entering the house"; then it puts forward the definition of "household", especially the definition of "household" under special circumstances; finally, it probes into when the burglary is established. The third chapter discusses the theft with murder weapon. Firstly, the author analyzes the rationality of the crime of theft with the murder weapon; then probes into the difference between the theft with the murder weapon and the robbery with the weapon; then analyzes in detail the words "carry" and "murder weapon"; then probes into several puzzles in the judicial practice; Finally, the attempted case of theft with a murder weapon was mentioned. Chapter four discusses the behavior of pickpocketing. This chapter is the key chapter of this paper. Firstly, it states the reasonableness of the crime of pickpocketing, then states the troubles brought about by the crime of pickpocketing from the opposite side, then analyzes how to define the behavior of pickpocketing correctly, which involves the basic elements of the act of pickpocketing, the public place and the intimate burglary. Then it analyzes when pickpocketing is established, and finally analyzes the judicial cognizance of the crime of pickpocketing, and points out the legislative perfection of the crime of pickpocketing. The conclusion part summarizes the content of the article and clarifies the emphasis on the purpose of writing.
【学位授予单位】：华东政法大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2014
【分类号】：D924.35
本文编号：2428290
[Abstract]:The Criminal Law Amendment (8) > adds three special types of larceny: burglary, burglary with murder weapon and pickpocketing, which makes the crime of larceny rise to five forms, and the five ways of larceny are juxtaposed and independent of each other. Since its implementation on May 1, 2011, the Amendment has played an important role in protecting the safety of people's property, personal safety and maintaining public order, but there are still some conflicts on how to correctly understand and apply the crime of theft under the Amendment. In order to better understand and apply the crime of larceny under the amendment in judicial practice, the article intends to interpret the related types of larceny, such as "multiple theft", "burglary", "burglary with murder weapon" and "pickpocketing". And how to correctly apply the crime of theft under the amendment to put forward their own views. This paper is divided into three parts: introduction, text and conclusion. In the foreword part, the theme of this paper is drawn from the case that pickpocketing is sentenced by 1.5 yuan, and the different provisions of the new and old laws on pickpocketing behavior are briefly described. This paper briefly explains the social harmfulness of the new form of theft and the reasons for its incrimination, analyzes on the irrationality of the standard of one-size-fits-all in judicial practice, and points out clearly the theme of this article: the understanding and application of the crime of larceny. There are four chapters in the text: the first chapter discusses the identification of multiple theft. Firstly, it introduces the recognition of "many times" in the new and old judicial interpretations, secondly, analyzes how to define the number of "times", and then discusses whether there is a standard of amount for the establishment of multiple thefts, and whether it is required to achieve completion every time. Finally, it analyzes the connection between multiple theft and administrative punishment. Chapter two discusses burglary. Firstly, it states the reasons for the individual crime of burglary; secondly, it analyzes the dynamic words of "entering the house"; then it puts forward the definition of "household", especially the definition of "household" under special circumstances; finally, it probes into when the burglary is established. The third chapter discusses the theft with murder weapon. Firstly, the author analyzes the rationality of the crime of theft with the murder weapon; then probes into the difference between the theft with the murder weapon and the robbery with the weapon; then analyzes in detail the words "carry" and "murder weapon"; then probes into several puzzles in the judicial practice; Finally, the attempted case of theft with a murder weapon was mentioned. Chapter four discusses the behavior of pickpocketing. This chapter is the key chapter of this paper. Firstly, it states the reasonableness of the crime of pickpocketing, then states the troubles brought about by the crime of pickpocketing from the opposite side, then analyzes how to define the behavior of pickpocketing correctly, which involves the basic elements of the act of pickpocketing, the public place and the intimate burglary. Then it analyzes when pickpocketing is established, and finally analyzes the judicial cognizance of the crime of pickpocketing, and points out the legislative perfection of the crime of pickpocketing. The conclusion part summarizes the content of the article and clarifies the emphasis on the purpose of writing.
【学位授予单位】：华东政法大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2014
【分类号】：D924.35
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 陈家林;;论刑法中的扒窃——对《刑法修正案(八)》的分析与解读[J];法律科学(西北政法大学学报);2011年04期
2 肖中华;论抢劫罪适用中的几个问题[J];法律科学.西北政法学院学报;1998年05期
3 张明楷;简论“携带凶器抢夺”[J];法商研究(中南政法学院学报);2000年04期
4 李云林;;简论携带凶器盗窃[J];法制与社会;2012年19期
5 李振林;;严惩盗窃也应有度——对《刑法修正案(八)》第39条规定之反思[J];河北公安警察职业学院学报;2011年02期
6 王占梅;;浅谈入户抢劫的司法认定[J];广西大学学报(哲学社会科学版);2008年S2期
7 高翼飞;;非数额型盗窃罪法律适用问题研究——兼评《刑法修正案(八)》第39条对司法实践的影响[J];中国人民公安大学学报(社会科学版);2013年05期
8 张静;景孝杰;;未成年人社会调查报告的定位与审查[J];华东政法大学学报;2011年05期
9 吴加明;;《刑法修正案(八)》中“扒窃”的司法实践认定[J];中国检察官;2011年14期
10 黎宏;;论盗窃罪中的多次盗窃[J];人民检察;2010年01期
，本文编号：2428290
本文链接：https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/xingfalunwen/2428290.html
